Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.
Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.
Accepted questions will be noted as such.
Ning Rules that Apply
Zeta Rules that Apply
Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.
This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 78 years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.
Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Hi Nancy,
On 22nd of April Iran successfully launched and orbited their first military satellite and its on its way to America based on its trajectory. The intention of this military satellite cannot be for good intention and it is disappointed that no interventions have been taken so far. It is also hard to believe that US intelligence doesn't know the intent of this satellite (such as EMP attack) and they must have plans to counter their moves whatever they might be. Would zetas like to comment on this. Many thanks.
https://www.newsmax.com/peterpry/nour-soleimani-ramdan-irgc/2020/04...
https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=45529
https://www.c4isrnet.com/electronic-warfare/2020/04/08/this-is-what...
Accepted via email:
Today, April 27, almost all news sites in the world published the news that the Pentagon has officially published a video of a UFO. There is a video by CNN. This topic was already touched upon earlier by CNN, on September 18. And on RT and other news sites. For what purpose did you again touch on this topic and what kind of UFO got on those videos, knowing that they are being watched? Is it connected with the next step towards declaring Nibiru and other extraterrestrial civilizations? Officially confirmed UFO videos from the government are very rare.
[and from another]
April 27, 2020
Pentagon officially releases UFO
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/27/politics/pentagon-ufo-videos/ind...
The Pentagon has officially released three short videos showing "unidentified aerial phenomena" that had previously been released by a private company.
[and from another]
https://youtu.be/60ZJQ4I7_3M
US Navy confirms UFO videos are the real deal
[and from another]
https://youtu.be/6rWOtrke0HY
Dec 16, 2017
Exclusive analysis brought to you by To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science: FLIR1 is the second of three US military videos of unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) that has been through the official declassification review process of the United States government and approved for public release.
[and from another]
September 18, 2019
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/18/politics/navy-confirms-ufo-video...
For many years, our aviators didn't report these incursions because of the stigma attached to previous terminology and theories about what may or may not be in those videos.
[and from another]
April 27, 2020
https://ria.ru/20200427/1570651753.html
On the records made from military aircraft, some flying objects are visible, which in appearance cannot be attributed either to airplanes, or to helicopters, or to other known aircraft.
SOZT
A year ago on April 23, 2019 the US Navy made a rule change
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/30ap2019.htm
to allow pilots to report Unexplained Aerial Phenomena. This avoided countless rules to repress such reporting of Unidentified Flying Objects. Disclosure has now moved up the ranks to the Pentagon, which is now releasing multiple videos. The UFO phenomenon has been official acknowledged, with release of files, by Chile
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue021.htm
in 2007, France
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue160.htm
in 2008, the UK
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue108.htm
in 2008, China
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue151.htm
in 2009, and Russia
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue333.htm
in 2013. The US media gave in and reported a UFO blitz
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue382.htm
on New Year’s Eve 2014. The US countered by debunking with the Blue Book files
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue436.htm
in 2015. The US has been late to the show.
The US is considered the brake on disclosure, as they hold evidence, including alien bodies, from the Roswell crash. Where Russia and Brazil have similar evidence of the alien presence, they are reluctant to disclose this if the US is still in a debunking mode. All must agree, and release their files, for any to be credible. Official disclosure in the US still has a long way to go, as videos of Unexplained Aerial Phenomena do not make the leap to presenting alien bodies to the public. Just when the US takes that step is still an unknown, and very much in the hands of man.
EOZT
Prior ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/30ap2019.htm
Beyond reducing the fear of reporting UFO incidents, what is the point of this new Navy rule change? Instead of reporting a UFO they will be reporting an “unexplained aerial phenomena”. What the public is not seeing is the plethora of rules related to UFOs. Anyone reporting a UFO, either by claiming to be a witness or just passing along information, is liable to be demoted or put under a mental health evaluation! How else to keep the alien presence a secret all these decades? This is still the case for the much restricted Air Force, however. Is disclosure being expedited by this move? Without question, as UFOs can now be written into the official record, and ultimately accessed by the public. This move by the Navy is a fresh start.
As is our usual practice, we are closing out this April Q&A and opening the May Q&A. Please post your questions there. Thank you. (http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-may-31-2020)
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2024 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by