I would like to ask such question. Recently our friends said that after the platforms movement at mark 7 South America will move to the west on about 250 miles, and Gibraltar strait will increase on 125 miles, etc. Could our friends to answer - is it possible that the establishment will be able to hide the facts of the movement of continents from ordinary people? Will receive whether the general public a proof of the continents movement, such as photographs, eyewitness testimony, scientific articles, etc?

Going into the 7 of 10 Indonesia and its neighbors were braced for sinking, prepared to issue all manner of excuses for flooding other than the ZetaTalk prediction. Any investigative reporters were brutally suppressed. As is now history, we now see that rain, land subsidence due to withdrawing water from aquifers, unusually high tides, landslides due to collapsing mines, and sea wall failures have been used as excuses. That flooding lasts for months and refuses to subside is rarely mentioned in the press. Even NASA, in their analysis of their own satellite images on Modis, refuses to acknowledge what is in plain view - the sinking.

When the S America roll began, albeit slowly, it was again clear that such excuses were to be used for sinking on the Caribbean islands. And just as with the Earth wobble, where the sunrise and sunset are out of place regularly, the media avoids any subject that would threatened to point to the accuracy of the ZetaTalk predictions. The mode is first "no comment", and when this does not succeed to ridicule the questioner. NASA has attempted to ridicule Nancy out of existence but has only succeeded in giving her notoriety, shooting themselves in the foot once again.

When avoidance and ridicule fail, and the Internet chatter is viral over the Earth plates being out of position, what then? The establishment will try to keep ahead of these changes by adjusting their GPS satellites, so that nothing seems to be amiss. These satellites speak to each other, and to ground based command centers, and our predictions on plate movements are no secret, so they are armed and ready. But a ship having to add 125 miles to a trip from Spain to the north coast of Africa is a hard secret to suppress on the Internet, especially when balanced by a reduced mileage for ships in the Pacific. Thus it will be the Internet, with chatter about such mileage changes and GPS faltering, that will lead the charge against the cover-up.

Source: ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for January 21, 2012

Views: 2150

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Nancy Lieder on January 22, 2012 at 12:27pm

@ George Gonthier

those red falls are supposed to be a type of algae BUT require iron (iron oxide as in the tail of PX) to grow. So this is a combined situation. Where did the iron come from in the ice?

http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue177.htm

Blood Falls
February 24, 2010
http://static.atlasobscura.com/place/blood-falls
This five-story, blood-red waterfall pours very slowly out of the Taylor Glacier in Antarctica's McMurdo Dry Valleys. When geologists first discovered the frozen waterfall in 1911, they thought the red color came from algae, but its true nature turned out to be much more spectacular. Roughly 2 million years ago, the Taylor Glacier sealed beneath it a small body of water which contained an ancient community of microbes. Trapped below a thick layer of ice, they have remained there ever since, isolated inside a natural time capsule. Evolving independently of the rest of the living world, these microbes exist without heat, light, or oxygen, and are essentially the definition of "primordial ooze." The trapped lake has very high salinity and is rich in iron, which gives the waterfall its red color.

There is immense evidence that red dust in the tail of Planet X, aka Nibiru, was dropped on planet Earth during the periodic passages of Planet X. Velikovsky documented some of this in his book Worlds in Collision.

In the middle of the second millennium before the present era (approximately 3,500 years ago), the earth underwent one of the greatest catastrophes in its history. A celestial body ... came very close to the earth. The account of this catastrophe can be reconstructed from evidence supplied by a large number of documents. The comet .. touched the earth first with it's gaseous tail. .. Servius wrote, "It was not of a flaming but of a bloody redness." One of the first visible signs of this encounter was the reddening of the earth's surface by a fine dust of rusty pigment. In sea, lake, and river this pigment gave a bloody coloring to the water. Because of these particles of ferruginous or other soluble pigment, the world turned red. The Manuscript Quiche of the Mayas tells that in the Western Hemisphere, in the days of a great cataclysm, when the earth quaked and the sun's motion was interrupted, the water in the rivers turned to blood. Ipuwer, the Egyptian eyewitness to the catastrophe, wrote his lament on papyrus, "The river is blood", and this corresponds with the Book of Exodus 7:20: "All the waters that were in the river were turned to blood".

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2021   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service