For those who are not aware, Nancy has indicated that she is not going to be available anymore to answer all of your questions that you email her as her health and resources are being stretched and has deleted all of those in her friends list except those on her mirror sites team.
Additionally, the Zetatalk Chat sessions are ONLY for people asking the Zetas a question and all non-question related posts will be deleted by the mods.
This is also being done as in the near future, due to the anticipated increase in interest in the Ning when the 7/10 events really kick in, even MORE policing of the site will be required of the mods and when that happens, any content to be deleted or members to be suspended will occur without warning or explanation.
So, where you would have messaged Nancy before or posted on the ZetaTalk chat and now can't as it's not a direct question for the Zetas, post your questions here! All questions welcome.
Since the start of this Ning, you have a wealth of individuals who know the ZetaTalk message almost as well as Nancy does - there's no need to ask her, just ask here. Nancy is one person, but the Ning is a big group who can answer your questions (and want to answer your questions) in the same way!
(and please don't PM me with your questions - post them here instead)
ADDENDUM by Nancy. This was a Zeta response on December 4, 2010 during the chats, and I think it applies. I have warned the chats that the time would come when I would only say 'accepted' for those accepted, and not respond at all to other questions. That time has come, as of this week. Here's the prior ZetaTalk:
This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek.
To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.
Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Hi Vicki,
I've had problems copying and pasting gas explosions. I now have to do it in piece meal into the heading of reply to discussion. I can paste text, a picture separately and or film but even with a utube video where I can copy embed code, I am having trouble pasting it here.
Alot of quirky internet behavior.......don't know why but there's always a way around it.
Where there's a Will, there's a Way.
if your trip is early summer it should be Ok , why do'nt you take your trip to where your Safe place could be -
could be just as beautiful :)
Howard said:
Billy - We are at a 7 of 10. Don't waste any time planning a family vacation to Yellowstone. Instead, start planning a permanent relocation somewhere safe - eastern Montana perhaps.
Billy Wilkie said:well ,here i go...We are planning a trip to Yellow Stone this Summer...I am afraid, by the looks of things ,we may have to cancel.I certainly do not want to put my family's lives in jeopordy..Any thoughts ?Please ,i would rather you not point out my ignorance.I am just like everyone else,trying to find my way..There is so much info Nancy has graciously given me.I am unable to memorize it unlike several of you..With your help i may make a wise decision.Thank you
Hi Douglas, -
I´d like to suggest you join the group : http://poleshift.ning.com/group/surviving - or at least look through some of the blogs there, as many members have added tons and tons of personal advice concerning a number of subjects to that specific group, created for that purpose.
And - no - I´m not trying to snub you off ! - I merely thought about it, and it was clear to me that any number of folks would have a completely different view of what´s necessary than their neighbors.. Thus, some will find it hard to survive without meat in any form, where, for instane if your Aftertime Climate changes to Polar, you´d like to add more FAT and Vitamin D to your diet, than if your Aftertime Climate turns to Tropical. (Hope this makes you understand !) And maybe you´ll even change your mind from stocking up on too much emergency food to stocking up on SEEDS and little trees and bushes ?? Read about hydroponics ??
Other than that, I KNOW that Amazon have started to sell survival stuff from a variety of companies ONLINE, and much of it is available for European customers as well.
You can simply google for results, and I´d like to add that usually for each product there´s a whole list of readers´comments and recommendations as well...
Best,-
malou
Douglas Cutler said:
I have seen recently ads for the most 39 important survival foods or things to have. Is there anyone out there that has bought this care to share what these are and maybe go through the list and add or delete so that we with limited
funds can get a good list too?
Yes I am aware of that. I was looking for a short list of the most important things. Me and a lot of others are on a
very limited budget.
Douglas, Malou is right about looking at the stuff in the link given. It's also about common sense. Anything that is dried, or that can be transported easily as well as being able to be packed tightly into a back pack like pasta, rice even mashed potato is okay in a pinch! Even on a tight budget, small amounts each week or month can accumulate and you'd be surprised what you'd find in your pantry. Drying fruits like apples are good as they can keep for a long time. Dried beans etc travel well, soak, drain and cook, lentils as well, dried peas that kind of thing. You need to research what you want to take with you, or store, so that when it comes time to go, you can travel or store them with ease. There are many blogs devoted to survival including food. Research, research research!
@ Douglas Cutler....
My group is stocking salt as a cooking additive but also as a trade item later! Will be very valuable. Beans and rice and spaghetti then spam. You can boil pine needles into a tea for vit C. We are medics and police in my group so we looked at what would prove the most energy on a low budget. Ask if you need more help!
Douglas, I bought that "39 Things You Can't Survive Without" and it was a waste of $40. Other than foods mentioned previously, I'd stock up on batteries, which will be important for the first year or two after PS, and would be good bartering items. I know the tenor of this blog is against having guns, but I believe gun ownership is essential in the times to come. The New World Order has some nasty plans for us -- see Bill 1287 -- so ammunition is critical. Also, guns & ammo for hunting meat & defending against the 43% of humans who become mentally unstable during the PS process, as well as stray dogs who form packs. I bought a fancy slingshot for hunting also. Lots of salt for curing meats; alcohol for use as antiseptic; a distiller for making water (and some AdyaClarity -- google it); those inexpensive emergency "blankets" made out of mylar -- important use: slip under them and helicopter infrared won't pick up your body heat. For me, pens & paper; biodegradeable soap; disposable razors w/ a sharpener that gives them longer life; canned soups; Dutch oven for making bread over a campfire; a small folding shovel like the Marines use (surprisingly inexpensive); toilet paper until you can develop something else for that purpose -- right now, I'm thinking about a crude bidet system for keeping clean & staving off infections. Essential!: non-GMO seeds... eventually, we'll get some sun. Two sets of basic, non-electric tools... hand drills, hammers, screwdrivers, pliers, measuring tapes, hand planes, stone for sharpening, lots of nails...
Cabela's has firestarters that are good for 3,000+ fires... you shave a small bit of magnesium and spark it into your kindling or lint. We've got some gas masks and filters for breathing when outside in the polluted air. These are not as expensive as you'd imagine!
This is all I can think of off the top of my head. Skip going to movies or eating out at restaurants... use the money for survival items. Hope this helps.
Douglas Cutler said:
I have seen recently ads for the most 39 important survival foods or things to have. Is there anyone out there that has bought this care to share what these are and maybe go through the list and add or delete so that we with limited
funds can get a good list too?
@ Vicky Ruzicka:
Re the supposed New World Order. That was an ambition, back in the day. But per the Zetas...
SOZT: [...] There is no such group as the New World Order, though many have espoused this philosophy. This is an attitude, which includes maintaining the status of the wealthy and politically powerful, enslaving the common man, and eliminating what this crowd considers useless eater, those whose lives cannot benefit the elite directly. They do not function as one, nor do they even know of one other. Given that this is a disorganized crowd, it is beyond ridiculous to assume there is an organized counter-culture. What would they target? EOZT
I would think that you would consider the top of the water to be 0 and ignore how deep it is.
It raised to 8 ft then that is only 3 ft. I would go back and ask them if they meant it raised an additonal 8 ft.
or did it raise to the 8 ft deep height. To be safe I would consider digging your survival trench on top of the hill.
5ft deep then the bottom would be 8+13+10= 31ft -5ft deep= 25ft from normal river top.
Vicki H. said:
Am looking for some clarification on how to calculate the predicted flood levels on rivers. I know the Zetas said to find out what is the highest a river ever rose, then multiply by 3 to get what post PS levels will be. That sounded simple enough until I actually went to do some figuring. Here's the confusion.
The small river near me is normally considered to run at a 5 ft level. The emergency dept told me that 8 ft is the highest it ever rose to. Now, do I take that 8 ft level and multiply times three, for a river height of 24?
OR, do I take the difference of what's normal (5 ft) and subtract from flood level (8 ft), to get a rise of 3 ft. If one then multiplies the 3 ft by 3, you get a 9 ft additional height, which could then be added to the original 5 ft normal level. That would mean that the river will be at about a 14 ft height. This is a big difference - 14 ft or 24 ft. The other complication is where the surface of the river is at normal height (about 8 ft BELOW the road surface of the bridge because it runs in a rather deep channel). So I have a river that is considered normal at 5 ft, plus 8 ft up to road surface, then the house is 13 ft above road surface (and a quarter mile away), and a hill behind the house is another 10 ft up from the house. Anyone who is good with math and conceptualizing this able to help me wander through this to get to a realistic conclusion?
PS: I know that the house will probably blow away, but I still need to know whether the general area will stay above river level or not. Anyone who is clear on how to work this problem, I'll appreciate your input. Thanks!
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2024 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by