Regionally Specific Earthquake Maps
|
Related Informations:
Earthquakes during the poleshift Magnetic twist and the effects
|
Additional Information from the F.A.Q: Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
Q: How can I understand the Magnetosphere? - About the Magnetosphere
Q: Is there a relationship between disturbances in the magnetosphere and seismic activity? |
Altering Earthquakes:
As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?
SOZT: Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many? EOZT
Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?
SOZT: It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.
We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable. EOZT
Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.
[Edited by the Moderation]
Comment
More proof of downgrading here:
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/earthquake-6-2-ceram-sea-i...
Now for those interested, here is enough fodder to raise some serious suspicions about the information from governments:
Take a look at the below.
It is a screen capture from the USGS site. Notice anything odd?
1. Apart from a number of quakes not even listed (including a 4.0 on the San Andreas fault),
2. There are 15 entries in the last 24 hours.
3. Of those 15 entries, 13 ends in a decimal number of x.6 to x.9 (example 4.7 or 4.9 etc)
4. Of those entries, only two have a decimal of .0 to .5
One would expect the decimals to spread roughly 50/50, but 83% in the range .6 to .9 is statistically significant. It would appear that the effort to downgrade all quakes to under the big numbers (example a 5.4 to a 4.9) is taking epic proportions.
The Z's were right in that the information gathered is becoming meaningless. If you were to do a search for 5.0 or stronger quakes, you'll find that the bulk has been downgraded to fall somewhere in the 4's.
Furthermore, if you have both the USGS and European seismic data loaded onto your Google Earth as a plugin, you'll notice that in around 75% or more of the cases, there is a discrepancy between what the USGS reports and what the Europeans report. In almost all cases, the USGS's number is lower by 0.1 to 0.4.
We are getting forced to look for our information elsewere - again, as predicted.
Take care all.
A downgrade from 7.2 to 4.2 seems extreme, but not beyond the realm of possibility. Any damage reports resulting from this quake may provide more clarity. Source
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2025 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by
You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!
Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift