EARTHQUAKES Worldwide! (Frequently Updated)

Global Earthquake Maps

ANF

EMSC

Global Incident Map

IRIS

SNNC

USGS

Regionally Specific Earthquake Maps

Australia

Canada

Germany

Japan

Iceland
 

 

 

Related Informations:

 

Earthquakes during the poleshift

Earth Wobble

Wobble effect

TT - Earth Wobble

Deep Quakes

Quake Swarms

Pre-Shift Quakes

Magnetic twist and the effects

Wobble sloshing

Scripted Drama

Quake charts

 

 

Additional Information from the F.A.Q:

Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
A: https://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/explaining-the-earth-wobble

 

Q: How can I understand the Magnetosphere?

- About the Magnetosphere
- What the graphs on the Magnetosphere Simulation mean

 

Q: Is there a relationship between disturbances in the magnetosphere and seismic activity?
- Magnetosphere Deformations and Earth Wobble Effects
- Approach to Earthquake Prediction from the Magnetosphere Simulation
- Analysis try; Earthquakes/plate movement and magnetosphere simula...

Altering Earthquakes:

ZetaTalk Aug 7, 2010

As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?

SOZT:   Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many?   EOZT


ZetaTalk Jun 18, 2011

Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?

SOZT:   It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.

We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable.   EOZT



Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.

[Edited by the Moderation]

 

Views: 576135

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Ann Eller on August 15, 2012 at 11:44am

We are having tremors here in Northern Arizona.  It actually feels like sleeping on an ocean liner or water bed lately.

Comment by Robyn Appleton on August 14, 2012 at 6:18pm
Comment by Robyn Appleton on August 14, 2012 at 6:04pm
Comment by Henri Slabbert on August 14, 2012 at 2:02pm

@ lonne

Shameless covering up, eh? Two 5.1 reduced to 0.1's. The originals are still showed on this site:

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/


Tuesday August 14 2012, 03:09:11 UTC     Northern California         5.1     66.6     USGS Feed     
Tuesday August 14 2012, 03:09:04 UTC     Monterey Bay, California    5.1     5.0     USGS Feed     
Tuesday August 14 2012, 03:08:50 UTC     Northern California         5.1     65.4     USGS Feed     
Tuesday August 14 2012, 02:59:45 UTC     Sea of Okhotsk, Russia.     7.7     650.0     GeoScience Australia     
Tuesday August 14 2012, 02:59:42 UTC     Sea of Okhotsk             7.7     625.9     USGS Feed     
Tuesday August 14 2012, 02:59:40 UTC     Sea Of Okhotsk             7.7     611.0     CSEM-EMSC
Tuesday August 14 2012, 02:58:28 UT     Sea of Okhotsk             7.3     582.0     USGS Feed

Comment by Jorge on August 14, 2012 at 1:52pm

The 7.7 Magnitude - Sea of Okhotsk is very interesting , in my opinion. It is very strong and very deep : 625 kilometers deep. This means either a huge magma surge , or that the whole plate border is moving  ... Not just the surface , but the whole plate

 

Comment by lonne rey on August 14, 2012 at 10:22am

The same list a few minutes later

 

USGS Offshore Northern California Aug 14 04:48 AM 2.7 20.3 MAP I Felt It
USGS Northern California - Deleted By Usgs Aug 14 03:09 AM 0.1 66.6 MAP I Felt It
USGS Monterey Bay, California Aug 14 03:09 AM 3.9 5.0 MAP I Felt It
USGS Northern California - Deleted By Usgs Aug 14 03:08 AM 0.1 65.4 MAP I Felt It

 

Comment by lonne rey on August 14, 2012 at 9:35am

source

USGS Utah Aug 14 07:17 AM 2.9 0.3 MAP I Felt It
USGS Offshore Northern California Aug 14 04:48 AM 2.7 20.3 MAP I Felt It
USGS Northern California Aug 14 03:09 AM 5.1 66.6 MAP I Felt It
USGS Monterey Bay, California Aug 14 03:09 AM 3.9 5.0 MAP I Felt It
USGS Northern California Aug 14 03:08 AM 5.1 65.4 MAP I Felt It
Comment by astrogal50 on August 14, 2012 at 7:05am

7.7 already lowered to a 7.3?

Even what the USGS reveals is troubling, not normal, even for these days:

M 7.3, 158km ENE of Poronaysk, Russia Tuesday, August 14, 2012 02:59:42 UTC

M 6.3, 280km ESE of Hotan, China Sunday, August 12, 2012 10:47:06 UTC

M 6.3, 32km WSW of Ahar, Iran Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:34:35 UTC

M 6.4, 23km SW of Ahar, Iran Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:23:17 UTC http://www.usgs.gov/

Comment by CarlosFernandez on August 14, 2012 at 6:22am
Comment by CarlosFernandez on August 14, 2012 at 6:20am

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2025   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service