Regionally Specific Earthquake Maps
|
Related Informations:
Earthquakes during the poleshift Magnetic twist and the effects
|
Additional Information from the F.A.Q: Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
Q: How can I understand the Magnetosphere? - About the Magnetosphere
Q: Is there a relationship between disturbances in the magnetosphere and seismic activity? |
Altering Earthquakes:
As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?
SOZT: Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many? EOZT
Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?
SOZT: It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.
We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable. EOZT
Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.
[Edited by the Moderation]
Comment
Live Earthquakes Map
http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
USGS
Tsunami stations in event mode
4.8 2013/01/01 20:05:03 2.378 96.175 38.3 SIMEULUE, INDONESIA
5.0 2013/01/01 15:18:38 -1.105 126.818 32.8 KEPULAUAN SULA, INDONESIA
2013-01-01 13:13:59 4.6 80.53°N 121.88°E 10 M East of Severnaya Zemlya
4.5 2013/01/01 12:21:26 -26.809 -63.347 565.3 SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO, ARGENTINA
4.4 2013/01/01 09:21:19 -0.207 98.546 47.3 KEPULAUAN BATU, INDONESIA
4.9 2013/01/01 09:19:17 26.920 127.470 98.2 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN
4.6 2013/01/01 08:45:44 -7.580 155.964 83.9 SOLOMON ISLANDS
4.0 2013/01/01 08:38:54 1.950 91.180 10.0 NORTH INDIAN OCEAN
4.7 2013/01/01 08:16:43 18.692 118.757 20.1 PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION
4.5 2013/01/01 05:35:47 15.586 -98.458 9.8 OFFSHORE OAXACA, MEXICO
4.5 2013/01/01 04:08:35 36.451 71.190 113.0 HINDU KUSH REGION, AFGHANISTAN
4.6 2013/01/01 03:32:12 40.358 141.540 100.5 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.6 2012/12/31 21:37:36 -6.949 154.656 51.0 BOUGAINVILLE REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA
5.2 2012/12/31 20:02:05 -61.596 154.288 10.0 BALLENY ISLANDS REGION
4.4 2012/12/31 15:33:54 14.083 -92.184 62.4 OFFSHORE GUATEMALA
4.5 2012/12/31 15:11:59 52.788 171.431 48.4 NEAR ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
4.0 2012/12/31 15:00:16 16.625 -98.755 35.0 GUERRERO, MEXICO
4.5 2012/12/31 14:21:28 14.306 -92.027 62.7 OFFSHORE GUATEMALA
4.7 2012/12/31 14:15:24 -7.683 128.402 82.2 KEPULAUAN BARAT DAYA, INDONESIA
4.8 2012/12/31 09:36:02 37.475 143.679 34.3 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
5.0 2012/12/31 08:50:08 -3.237 86.454 9.8 SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN
4.9 2012/12/31 08:46:21 -11.193 -77.489 69.8 NEAR THE COAST OF CENTRAL PERU
4.6 2012/12/31 06:01:25 -7.024 120.279 594.4 FLORES SEA
4.7 2012/12/31 01:45:00 35.271 -36.277 10.1 NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
5.0 2012/12/31 01:15:18 15.058 -92.140 113.9 CHIAPAS, MEXICO
5.2 2012/12/30 20:49:30 -12.878 -70.974 41.5 CENTRAL PERU
4.7 2012/12/30 19:25:54 -2.026 100.765 62.4 KEPULAUAN MENTAWAI REGION, INDONESIA
4.7 2012/12/30 16:58:41 -21.797 -176.685 216.6 FIJI REGION
4.8 2012/12/30 16:03:26 23.469 120.952 3.7 TAIWAN
5.2 2012/12/30 12:21:24 14.525 -92.927 35.5 OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO
5.1 2012/12/30 11:33:42 1.574 126.690 58.6 MOLUCCA SEA
2.8 2013/01/01 11:38:14 34.360 -97.585 5.0 OKLAHOMA
3.9 2012/12/31 02:07:22 47.722 -128.749 10.0 OFF THE COAST OF WASHINGTON
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_al...
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/
2013-01-01 19:11:27.04 34.90 S 71.87 W 55 3.3 MAULE, CHILE
2013-01-01 17:50:38. 18.57 S 69.72 W 127 3.0 TARAPACA, CHILE
2013-01-01 16:52:3 36.21 N 21.53 E 10 3.3 SOUTHERN GREECE
2013-01-01 15:28:28.0 42.91 N 7.36 W 15 3.4 SPAIN
2013-01-01 11:59:01. 23.64 S 68.86 W 98 3.0 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
2013-01-01 10:07:18.0 21.55 S 69.93 W 46 3.1 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
2013-01-01 09:23:19.0 33.62 S 72.11 W 43 3.2 OFFSHORE VALPARAISO, CHILE
2013-01-01 08:31:54.0 21.82 S 68.69 W 123 3.4 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
2013-01-01 07:12:25.0 30.27 S 70.95 W 18 3.0 COQUIMBO, CHILE
2013-01-01 06:10:05.0 43.16 N 0.18 W 2 3.5 PYRENEES
2013-01-01 06:34:57.0 43.12 N 0.23 W 2 3.3 PYRENEES
http://www.emsc-csem.org/#2
01/01/2013 21:15:23 27.8186 -18.0003 17 2.6 mbLg N FRONTERA.IHI EL HIERRO - CANARIAS
http://www.geo.ign.es/ign/layoutIn/sismoDetalleTerremotos.do?evid=1...
01/01/2013 20:24:04 27.8010 -17.9855 20 1.8 mbLg NE FRONTERA.IHI
01/01/2013 20:07:15 27.8215 -17.9977 19 1.8 mbLg N FRONTERA.IHI
01/01/2013 19:21:27 27.8649 -18.0279 2.3 mbLg NW FRONTERA.IHI [+
01/01/2013 19:14:18 27.7991 -17.9987 22 1.9 mbLg N FRONTERA.IHI
01/01/2013 18:51:08 27.8251 -17.9968 21 2.5 mbLg N FRONTERA.IHI SWARM
http://www.geo.ign.es/ign/layoutIn/sismoListadoTerremotos.do?zona=1...
5.7 2013/01/01 07:35:50 (UTC) 46.904 N 151.023 E 48.7 Km (30.3 Miles) 274 KM SE OF VOSTOK, RUSSIA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000ei4d#summary
Just like the Pyrenees one yesaterday .. I guess with about 50% of the reported quakes on USGS being above 4.5 in the past 7 days now.. they are having to skip a few to "save alarming the populace" - yeah right.. Come on lets have some honesty please! surely they can't keep getting away with this.. there are way too many eyes on them now.
Not only was today's "severe" 5.0 quake off New Zealand at 14:11 UTC not reported by USGS, it barely registers on the LISS heliplot, despite the fact the seismic monitoring station is only 175 miles away from this shallow 5km quake's epicenter.
Comparing this to the heliplot of Friday's 5.1 quake in Chile, which was 4 times deeper (22 km) and over 300 miles further away from the monitoring station, one can conclude with certainty that seismic information reported by the United States Geological Survey is blatantly corrupt and unreliable.
Two quakes this morning in NZ One 5.0 at a depth of 5Km and the other 4.3 at a depth of 6Km
Source geonet.org.nz
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2025 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by
You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!
Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift