Please Place your Planet X Related Captures Here

[Moderating Staff]

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Thank you Beverly and Planet Twelve for your kind words. I studied the photos for a while and decided that it was a reflection. The reasons why I think so are

1. The camera is facing the sun directly and reflections and flares are inevitable,

2. All the pictures are in the same angle and this prevents one from reaching a certain conclusion,

3. The object (R#2) doesn't move independently but along with the sun.

 

If we had the 5 shots, reflections and flares would be eliminated easily.

Good Night

 

[Waveguide]

From this morning on east coast of the US.

The sequence image is at one minute intervals.

 

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Steve, sorry, I was away from home, my computer and programs, so I couldn't comment earlier.

I studied your photos:

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/please-place-your-planet-x...

After analyzing many photos with flares and reflections, I got some ideas about the nature of them, for example,

1. When the lens is directed at the sun, flares and reflections are inevitable,

2. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that all object-like images in photos are all flares and reflections.

When I took the photos below, I moved the camera intentionally to place the reflections where I wanted:

 Your photos can have a Real Object in them:

The angle of the object changes but this is just normal on condition that it is a real object which must move around like other objects in the sky, including the earth (our viewing angle changes continuously and that's why we see the moon in different formations).

You say you tried hard to get rid of flares and reflections but you are still not sure about the object being real, I am not, either.

I believe the best thing to do when shooting the sun is taking 5 pictures like below:

Good Night

Selim

[Howard]

@ James & Christian- I believe what is shown is a lens flare.

[Sevan Makaracı]

Stanislav, i was watching a video very similar that you just posted....

 

[Stanislav]

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Fernando, Don and Georgia, thank you very much for your comments.

I, also,  thought about the reasons for the changing positions of the moon between Ankara, Turkey and Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA and tried to put the two cities and the moon with its position changes on the same image.

I think, the reason for this change is:

1. Changes in the latitude can cause this (but there isn't much difference in latitude:

     Ankara: 36 S 487552,93   E 4418973,68

     TC         : 15 T 464197,48    E 5010673,57), and/or

2. The moon moves about irregularly because of PX influence.

I tried to be as precise as possible to have an idea about the difference in the moon's appearance in the above mentioned places.

 

 

[astrogal50]

I find it interesting when possible captures of Planet X, moon swirls, or UFOs are unintentionally gifted to the common man via mainstream media.  Below is one:  Lots of sun "ghosts" or whatever they are called in this photo (date taken unknown), but check out the small, white orb around 6:00 o'clock.  Looks like a possible moon swirl to me!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/green/

Photo posted with "Six Tips To Escape The Summer Heat At Home" article at the front page of the Huffington Post Green section.  (The article itself is a good example of the many mainstream media articles designed to help you cope with Planet X related earth changes and/or make it appear that things are not abnormal.  Yeah, sure.) 

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Don, thank you for the interesting video.

Sometimes, I also record the moon with my video camera and luckily I made some recordings on the same day in Ankara, Turkey; 12 July 2011, Tuesday, between 00:43 and 00:48 TLT (22:43 - 22:48 GMT). I took some snapshots from my recording and compared them with the object in the YouTube video. Unfortunately, I couldn't capture a better screenshot from latter video. I resized my snapshot and rotated it a bit to the left. The original snapshot is there also. My conclusion is that the object in question is the double-mirror reflection of the moon, not the Dark Twin.

Regards

Selim

 

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Paula, thank you very much for your kind words.

I was a bit in a hurry while I was studying the image last night so I didn't notice there were branches in front of the sun and I thought it was intentionally created by hiring professional photographers who used special lenses to get this commercial image. But I realized that it was only a simple copy and paste action. Many photo tools can do this easily. I don't want to mislead anybody, so I have changed my comments. The image hasn't got anything to do with the reality but commerce.