in the search engine on this page....: this kind of question has been answered many times, I´m sure you´ll find something there, somewhere... : http://poleshift.ning.com/main/search/search?q=new+world+map
We, humans, have survived the poleshifts many, many times, as have our former colonizers, the Annunaki
A good guess at early native American housing would be rammed earth building, as seen in the Grand Canyon, for instance. You can read more about that kind of thing in the Surviving the Earth Changes Group, here on the Ning + check out : http://poleshift.ning.com/group/surviving/forum/topics/postpole-shift-primitive-1 which is by now a whole and complete catalogue of knowledge..
Once you use the search engines here and on ZT, don´t get disappointed if you type in something that doesn´t render a lot - try again, re-phrase.. suddenly you´ll get the gist of it..
Best,-
Tim Thompson said:According to the maps I've seen, they show N. America and S. America in the Northern Hemisphere. How does S.A. move past Africa without hitting it, if S.A. is rolling to the East?I've theorized that if looking at the map with N.America on the left, that Africa, Europe, Russia, Asia and Australia will move counter-clockwise (towards the right on a globe. Freeing up space for S.A. to shift to the right and upwards. Another question I had with the maps is, that if the N. Pole is now the bulge of Brazil as shown on the ZT maps and is to the right side of the globe; and the S. Pole is where what's left of India will be. Since the N and S on this map are not in line vertically doesn't that mean the equator should move so that the left part is crossing over canada (in it's new position) with the right half crossing over Australia? Does anyone know, have there been other advanced civilations (such as ours) that have survived prior pole shifts? I keep looking for the information about how primitive lives where lived, but it seems our superficially obsessed world has burried this information. For example: does anyone know where to find out what types of housing the Native American's lived in? Based upon where they lived in N. America? I searched last night and could only find basic information and very little real info, most of what I found was advertisements!I'm concerned that this lack of information will cause a much larger than expected decimation of the human population. What do you think?
Many thanks to all that make the ning what it is. A plethora and wealth of knowledge can be gleaned from here. Also, huge thanks to Nancy for devoting her life to this cause and to the Zetas for caring about us humans. Thank you!Regards,
Tim
…
This little article sat me down, hard. Can you and/or the Zetas comment on this next interesting “deed for humanity” by our friend, Mark Zuckerberg? It sounds…
y understanding is that these maps were not Zeta created or guided. As Zetas have predicted, they show Recife, Brazil as the new North Pole. The Aftertime grid map of North America shows Alaska on the equator and the West Coast of the US facing South, maybe 13-15 degrees above the equator. According to this Aftertime map prediction on ZetaTalk, the West Coast of the USA will face South in the Aftertime, the current North would face West, the East to the North, and so on. Would the Zetas care to comment on these aftertime maps? In talking with other members of the Ning community, there is some disagreement about the final positioning and orientation of North America, and other continents. A close friend, who is a Ning member, strongly believes that the Atlantic/East Coast will become the new West Coast – that East becomes West and West becomes East. But according to these Aftertime maps on ZetaTalk, it looks like the North coast of North America faces West, while Southern edge of NA faces East. The orientation of the continents matters to all survivors around the world, and affects the direction from which the sun rises and sets, impacts farming and potential solar use, etc. In addition to continental direction, there is also the question of location, or distance from the North Pole. I have heard the argument that every location today should be approximately the same distance away from Recife, Brazil in the Aftertime as it is today. Meaning, if you are 5000 miles away from Recife today, that you should be approximately 5000 miles away from Recife in the Aftertime – meaning you would be 5000 miles away from the new North Pole. Using Denver, CO as an example - today Denver is approximately 5500 miles from Recife, Brazil. So according to this line of thinking, in the Aftertime, Denver would be 5500 miles South of the new North Pole -- which would put Denver much farther to the South than these ZT Aftertime maps show, and would put Denver in an Aftertime-position similar to that of Panama today, close to the equator. Would the Zetas care to comment on these Aftertime Lat/Long maps shown on the ZetaTalk website, and their accuracy, relative to continental orientation, position, or location?
Thank you for your ongoing guidance, to Nancy for her commitment and sacrifice, and to all Ning members for their efforts!
Love & light,
john…
stellar migration in our galaxy
Created using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III, it shows how a third of stars in our galaxy have changed orbit
Scientists studied 100,000 stars to reveal their motions, locations and compositions of stars over four years
The map reveals how stars tend to migrate radially, moving closer or farther from the galactic center with time
Nearly a third of the stars in our own galaxy have dramatically changed their orbits.
This is according to a new map of the Milky Way that provides the first clear evidence of migration of stars throughout our galaxy.
The study could provide astronomers with a new understanding of how stars are formed and travel throughout the Milky Way.
This map of the Milky Way reveals how stellar orbits can change. It shows two pairs of stars (marked as red and blue) in which each pair started in the same orbit, and then one star in the pair changed orbits. The star marked as red has completed its move into a new orbit, while the star marked in blue is still moving. Nearly a third of the stars in our own galaxy are known to have changed their orbits
The map was created using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS) which studied 100,000 stars over four years.
'We were able to measure the properties of nearly 70,000 stars in our galaxy for this particular study,' said Donald Schneider, an astronomy professor at Penn State University.
'This exercise can be described as galactic archaeology.
'These data reveal the locations, motions, and compositions of the stars, which provide insights into their formation and their history.'
'In our modern world, many people move far away from their birthplaces, sometimes halfway around the world,' said Michael Hayden of New Mexico State University (NMSU), the lead author of the new study.
'Now we're finding the same is true of stars in our galaxy. About 30 per cent of the stars in our galaxy have traveled a long way from where they were born.'
The study shows how stars tend to migrate radially, moving closer or farther from the galactic center with time. This map, which was not part of the study, charts 219 million stars in the Milky Way in an incredible new map, which is the largest of its kind ever produced
The key to creating and interpreting this new map is measuring the elements in the atmosphere of each star.
'From the chemical composition of a star, we can learn its ancestry and life history,' Hayden said.
The chemical information comes from spectra, detailed measurements of how much light the star gives off at different wavelengths.
Spectra show prominent lines that correspond to elements and compounds. Reading the spectral lines of a star can tell astronomers the chemicals the star is made of.
'Stellar spectra show us that the chemical makeup of our galaxy is constantly changing,' said Jon Holtzman, an astronomer at NMSU who was involved in the study.
'Stars create heavier elements in their cores, and when the stars die, those heavier elements go back into the gas from which the next stars form.'
…
//www.zetatalk.com/ning/17jy2010.htm
Under our direction Nancy has ascertained via Google Earth that the new N Pole will be at the current lat/long of 5°S and 29°W and the new S Pole will be the current lat/long of 10°N and 78°E. These points are not on opposites of the globe from one another today. The Pacific compresses, the Atlantic widens, the S America Plate crunches through much of what is now the Caribbean Plate, and all this and more reform the globe somewhat so that geographical points are not relative to other geographical points as they are today. However, as a general guide to determine your new latitude, using these points and the map of the new geography and our statements on where the new Equator will ride should help you determine with more accuracy your new climate.
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/24jy2010.htm
It is impractical to think in terms of distance between cities on differing continents, as travel between such points will be impossible in the Aftertime. The most practical way of locating your new latitude is to locate the distance from your nearest new pole. For Portugal, of course, this is the new S Pole which will be where southern India is located today. There will be scant adjustment between these two points, and though the Red Sea will spread somewhat, this is not a massive difference from the distance that exists today. All of Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, China, and Asia can compute their future climate in this way. Australia and New Zealand should likewise compute their new latitude in this manner, making a slight allowance for a portion of the Indo-Australian Plate having pushed under the Himalayas somewhat. Other lands can compute their new latitude from their distance from the new Equator. Alaska, Antarctica, Greenland, Iceland, and northern Canada can assume a tropical climate and latitude based on the new Equator virtually passing either through their landmass or close by. For the Americas, the location of the new N Pole is key. This suffices for S America which will remain intact through the pole shift. For N America, which must account for the crumbling Caribbean Plate, the best calculation is a combination of computing where the new Equator rides in the Bering Straits and the distance from the new N Pole off the Bulge of Brazil. Where the two ends do not meet, then assume the new N Pole to be closer to you than the distance on today's map would compute. The N American continent will not stretch or expand, except for a slight increase in the width of the Seaway.
Vicki Hanna said:
I have a big question about future latitudes. The Zetas keep saying that we need to figure it out for ourselves, but there is too much conflicting info out there. I have spent months, literally, trying to figure out the new latitude for Michigan. Others have expressed confusion about Michigan and Ontario (next door), so I can't be alone with this problem. I've followed every suggestion that the Zetas have made and am still stumped. I finally broke down and sent an email directly to Nancy, figuring she would know where Wisconsin would end up and she herself told me that "Wisconsin will be like Alabama", which was good news because that would mean that Michigan will be like Tennessee (a great improvement). However, then I come across another reference where the Zetas said that "Nebraska will be like Alabama". Wisconsin and Nebraska are too far apart for them to both be "like Alabama". Every time I see another map or globe, I measure the distance between the equator and the new North Pole and it ALWAYS looks like Michigan will actually end up further north. Winters are tough enough here already. It's just plain idiocy to think that these winters are survivable WITHOUT power, solid shelters, etc etc.
Yet in reading the Safe Locs for the surrounding areas, Quebec is supposed to be much warmer, even Connecticut "will be, if anything, somewhat milder". I can't seem to get clear on this and it's crucial that I do so. I don't have good computer skills and can't provide all the links for my research. I could plug in a copy and paste plain text version of my whole file on this subject, but that would eat up too much space for everyone else to have to wade through.
I would like to ask the Zetas (but I'm too scared to do so) if, with their superior technology, they would be willing to publish some version of the projected new world map (with latitudes and longitudes) that would, once and for all, clear up these questions so that we can all get on to more pressing things. I've spent hours and hours on just this one point when I should be 1)continuing with the preparations or 2)taking the last of my money and moving to a more survivable location. They said in the Safe Locs that Michigan will have a relatively uneventful PS as far as plates and earth movement is concerned, but not one word about future climate.
Please don't tell me "how to figure this out for myself" by using some method or another. I'm truly defeated by this. So, has anyone else out there figured out, definitively, where Michigan is supposed to end up and would you please tell me? Or does someone else have the nerve to post this request to the Zetas (because I sure don't) to please supply us with the probable future world map that fully takes into account the opening of the Atlantic and the closing of the Pacific. I look at the New Geography map and see the east coast of Africa as equatorial almost right next to the new North Pole off Brazil, and am defeated. Please, I'm desperate to get this information. Bless you, whoever can help me with this. Thank you.
…
s; the main things to affect latitude are the new position of the poles and the stretched Atlantic/compressed Pacific so for the America's you hold the Bulge of Brazil at the north pole and look at the latitudes of any given location there. For Africa, Eurasia and Asia, hold India at the south pole and do the same.On the other globe, I drew in all the tectonic plate boundaries in permanent marker which is a very useful thing to have when trying to understand when is happening now - I refer to it all the time.
Vicki Hanna said:
I have a big question about future latitudes. The Zetas keep saying that we need to figure it out for ourselves, but there is too much conflicting info out there. I have spent months, literally, trying to figure out the new latitude for Michigan. Others have expressed confusion about Michigan and Ontario (next door), so I can't be alone with this problem. I've followed every suggestion that the Zetas have made and am still stumped. I finally broke down and sent an email directly to Nancy, figuring she would know where Wisconsin would end up and she herself told me that "Wisconsin will be like Alabama", which was good news because that would mean that Michigan will be like Tennessee (a great improvement). However, then I come across another reference where the Zetas said that "Nebraska will be like Alabama". Wisconsin and Nebraska are too far apart for them to both be "like Alabama". Every time I see another map or globe, I measure the distance between the equator and the new North Pole and it ALWAYS looks like Michigan will actually end up further north. Winters are tough enough here already. It's just plain idiocy to think that these winters are survivable WITHOUT power, solid shelters, etc etc.
Yet in reading the Safe Locs for the surrounding areas, Quebec is supposed to be much warmer, even Connecticut "will be, if anything, somewhat milder". I can't seem to get clear on this and it's crucial that I do so. I don't have good computer skills and can't provide all the links for my research. I could plug in a copy and paste plain text version of my whole file on this subject, but that would eat up too much space for everyone else to have to wade through.
I would like to ask the Zetas (but I'm too scared to do so) if, with their superior technology, they would be willing to publish some version of the projected new world map (with latitudes and longitudes) that would, once and for all, clear up these questions so that we can all get on to more pressing things. I've spent hours and hours on just this one point when I should be 1)continuing with the preparations or 2)taking the last of my money and moving to a more survivable location. They said in the Safe Locs that Michigan will have a relatively uneventful PS as far as plates and earth movement is concerned, but not one word about future climate.
Please don't tell me "how to figure this out for myself" by using some method or another. I'm truly defeated by this. So, has anyone else out there figured out, definitively, where Michigan is supposed to end up and would you please tell me? Or does someone else have the nerve to post this request to the Zetas (because I sure don't) to please supply us with the probable future world map that fully takes into account the opening of the Atlantic and the closing of the Pacific. I look at the New Geography map and see the east coast of Africa as equatorial almost right next to the new North Pole off Brazil, and am defeated. Please, I'm desperate to get this information. Bless you, whoever can help me with this. Thank you.
…
ether so it forms a globe. Compare this globe to a current globe. Then, research how the winds are going to change, as you will need to factor this in as well to understand what your weather will be like.
See, not so hard. Stay true - Jack
Vicki Hanna said:
I have a big question about future latitudes. The Zetas keep saying that we need to figure it out for ourselves, but there is too much conflicting info out there. I have spent months, literally, trying to figure out the new latitude for Michigan. Others have expressed confusion about Michigan and Ontario (next door), so I can't be alone with this problem. I've followed every suggestion that the Zetas have made and am still stumped. I finally broke down and sent an email directly to Nancy, figuring she would know where Wisconsin would end up and she herself told me that "Wisconsin will be like Alabama", which was good news because that would mean that Michigan will be like Tennessee (a great improvement). However, then I come across another reference where the Zetas said that "Nebraska will be like Alabama". Wisconsin and Nebraska are too far apart for them to both be "like Alabama". Every time I see another map or globe, I measure the distance between the equator and the new North Pole and it ALWAYS looks like Michigan will actually end up further north. Winters are tough enough here already. It's just plain idiocy to think that these winters are survivable WITHOUT power, solid shelters, etc etc.
Yet in reading the Safe Locs for the surrounding areas, Quebec is supposed to be much warmer, even Connecticut "will be, if anything, somewhat milder". I can't seem to get clear on this and it's crucial that I do so. I don't have good computer skills and can't provide all the links for my research. I could plug in a copy and paste plain text version of my whole file on this subject, but that would eat up too much space for everyone else to have to wade through.
I would like to ask the Zetas (but I'm too scared to do so) if, with their superior technology, they would be willing to publish some version of the projected new world map (with latitudes and longitudes) that would, once and for all, clear up these questions so that we can all get on to more pressing things. I've spent hours and hours on just this one point when I should be 1)continuing with the preparations or 2)taking the last of my money and moving to a more survivable location. They said in the Safe Locs that Michigan will have a relatively uneventful PS as far as plates and earth movement is concerned, but not one word about future climate.
Please don't tell me "how to figure this out for myself" by using some method or another. I'm truly defeated by this. So, has anyone else out there figured out, definitively, where Michigan is supposed to end up and would you please tell me? Or does someone else have the nerve to post this request to the Zetas (because I sure don't) to please supply us with the probable future world map that fully takes into account the opening of the Atlantic and the closing of the Pacific. I look at the New Geography map and see the east coast of Africa as equatorial almost right next to the new North Pole off Brazil, and am defeated. Please, I'm desperate to get this information. Bless you, whoever can help me with this. Thank you.
…
Added by 0stxys805y8v4 at 9:23am on January 23, 2011
I have many friends living on this island, also there is a very special and beautiful energy in Crete. Of course this applies to many places on our wonderful planet, but I still hope some light can be shared by the Zetas on this matter.…
are 50 more with the same thoughts who say nothing. I appreciate that you are that one in 50 who is articulate enough to speak for not only yourself, but many others. Derrick Johnson said:
Hi Vicki
Make a globe following these instructions. Use the latitude and longitude of the poles in the ZetaTalk below to help you.
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/mikes-modified-globe
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/17jy2010.htm
Under our direction Nancy has ascertained via Google Earth that the new N Pole will be at the current lat/long of 5°S and 29°W and the new S Pole will be the current lat/long of 10°N and 78°E. These points are not on opposites of the globe from one another today. The Pacific compresses, the Atlantic widens, the S America Plate crunches through much of what is now the Caribbean Plate, and all this and more reform the globe somewhat so that geographical points are not relative to other geographical points as they are today. However, as a general guide to determine your new latitude, using these points and the map of the new geography and our statements on where the new Equator will ride should help you determine with more accuracy your new climate.
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/24jy2010.htm
It is impractical to think in terms of distance between cities on differing continents, as travel between such points will be impossible in the Aftertime. The most practical way of locating your new latitude is to locate the distance from your nearest new pole. For Portugal, of course, this is the new S Pole which will be where southern India is located today. There will be scant adjustment between these two points, and though the Red Sea will spread somewhat, this is not a massive difference from the distance that exists today. All of Europe, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, China, and Asia can compute their future climate in this way. Australia and New Zealand should likewise compute their new latitude in this manner, making a slight allowance for a portion of the Indo-Australian Plate having pushed under the Himalayas somewhat. Other lands can compute their new latitude from their distance from the new Equator. Alaska, Antarctica, Greenland, Iceland, and northern Canada can assume a tropical climate and latitude based on the new Equator virtually passing either through their landmass or close by. For the Americas, the location of the new N Pole is key. This suffices for S America which will remain intact through the pole shift. For N America, which must account for the crumbling Caribbean Plate, the best calculation is a combination of computing where the new Equator rides in the Bering Straits and the distance from the new N Pole off the Bulge of Brazil. Where the two ends do not meet, then assume the new N Pole to be closer to you than the distance on today's map would compute. The N American continent will not stretch or expand, except for a slight increase in the width of the Seaway.
Vicki Hanna said:
I have a big question about future latitudes. The Zetas keep saying that we need to figure it out for ourselves, but there is too much conflicting info out there. I have spent months, literally, trying to figure out the new latitude for Michigan. Others have expressed confusion about Michigan and Ontario (next door), so I can't be alone with this problem. I've followed every suggestion that the Zetas have made and am still stumped. I finally broke down and sent an email directly to Nancy, figuring she would know where Wisconsin would end up and she herself told me that "Wisconsin will be like Alabama", which was good news because that would mean that Michigan will be like Tennessee (a great improvement). However, then I come across another reference where the Zetas said that "Nebraska will be like Alabama". Wisconsin and Nebraska are too far apart for them to both be "like Alabama". Every time I see another map or globe, I measure the distance between the equator and the new North Pole and it ALWAYS looks like Michigan will actually end up further north. Winters are tough enough here already. It's just plain idiocy to think that these winters are survivable WITHOUT power, solid shelters, etc etc.
Yet in reading the Safe Locs for the surrounding areas, Quebec is supposed to be much warmer, even Connecticut "will be, if anything, somewhat milder". I can't seem to get clear on this and it's crucial that I do so. I don't have good computer skills and can't provide all the links for my research. I could plug in a copy and paste plain text version of my whole file on this subject, but that would eat up too much space for everyone else to have to wade through.
I would like to ask the Zetas (but I'm too scared to do so) if, with their superior technology, they would be willing to publish some version of the projected new world map (with latitudes and longitudes) that would, once and for all, clear up these questions so that we can all get on to more pressing things. I've spent hours and hours on just this one point when I should be 1)continuing with the preparations or 2)taking the last of my money and moving to a more survivable location. They said in the Safe Locs that Michigan will have a relatively uneventful PS as far as plates and earth movement is concerned, but not one word about future climate.
Please don't tell me "how to figure this out for myself" by using some method or another. I'm truly defeated by this. So, has anyone else out there figured out, definitively, where Michigan is supposed to end up and would you please tell me? Or does someone else have the nerve to post this request to the Zetas (because I sure don't) to please supply us with the probable future world map that fully takes into account the opening of the Atlantic and the closing of the Pacific. I look at the New Geography map and see the east coast of Africa as equatorial almost right next to the new North Pole off Brazil, and am defeated. Please, I'm desperate to get this information. Bless you, whoever can help me with this. Thank you.
…
helping in disasters and all, but I smell an insidious way to track people. I suspect we all know what his intentions are (as it tracks movements of people in real time), but having you all comment will expose them more to the masses by having this on poleshift.ning and picked up by search engines. This is pretty slick on the elite’s part.[and from another]Some think this is a spy machine. [and from another]http://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-technology-disasters-idUSKBN18Z057Facebook launches disaster maps to help aid workers save lives. Facebook launched disaster maps - an initiative aimed at helping humanitarian organizations save lives in emergencies. [and from another]http://mashable.com/2017/06/07/facebook-disaster-maps-humanitarian-aid/#_kafAozngOqTThe company that it's launching a new product called "disaster maps," using aggregated, anonymized Facebook data in disaster areas to deliver crucial information to aid organizations during and after crises. Facebook is currently beta testing the product with three organizations: the World Food Programme, UNICEF, and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). Through disaster maps, researchers are currently sharing three types of information with these organizations. The first taps into Facebook's widely recognized social good product, Safety Check, offering information on where people are checking in safe. This shows how people are using the platform in a disaster. Facebook is also sharing data on location density—where people are located before, during, and after a disaster relative to where you would expect them to be. The third type of information they're focusing on is the direction in which people are moving. It's important to know if people are evacuating north, south, east, or west, so organizations know where to send food, water, and medicine. It could also pinpoint the location of roads, and whether they're congested and should be avoided in rescue efforts. SOZTRussia was not allowed to launch satellites http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/24ma2014.htm that would spy on migrants. In like manner, the Council of Worlds slapped Zuckerberg down http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/03sp2016.htmin 2016 over his ambitions to control survivors in Africa with his drone based Internet. He is now trying to be covert. His cover is to masquerade as an assist to disaster recovery providers. Zukerberg is hardly a humanitarian. As a member of the elite he wishes to limit and control the starving masses after the Pole Shift, to enslave them, and to eliminate those who will not be useful to he and his ilk. He seeks information. Look at what is to be learned! He would learn where survivors are grouped, their “density”, where they are moving, where they feel safe and are setting up new homes. For the elite, who wish to ELIMINATE certain segments of the population, whom they consider trouble makers or worthless as workers, this allows a pointed assassination campaign. Poisoned food or water, or self-limiting diseases such as infections, would be prime tools in such a campaign. If the density of survivors is to be limited, knowing what routes they are using can be targeted to divert survivors into smaller enclaves. This allows the elite to enslave these smaller groups, and to capture and relocate them later. Where Zuckerberg feels he has smugly gotten around the Council of Worlds objections, he makes a number of assumptions. First, that the Internet, in particular his FaceBook application, will be functional. Those communication routes used by the survivors and aid agencies genuinely concerned about helping them will function, but FaceBook will not. Second, the endeavors to poison survivor groups will fail, in a thousand different ways. Third, after losing track of the migrants, he will not be able to recover their locations or their direction, even if they move toward elite enclaves. True karma awaits. EOZTPrior ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/03sp2016.htmFaceBook is immensely popular and international, and Zuckerberg had announced almost a year ago that he intended to promote his internet.org via satellites and drones, to provide service to parts of the world with scarce access to the internet. Africa is clearly a key target. It should be no surprise that Africa is also a key target of many elite, who anticipate the high ground of Africa and its future temperate climate to be ideal for settlements and survival. Europe and India will migrate to Africa in droves, prior to the Pole Shift. Where satellites will be torn from the skies during the passage, prior to the Pole Shift itself they will function to some degree. Thus, those who have migrated to Africa, and set up settlements and formulated defense of their perimeter, will be accessing the internet via one of Zuckerberg’s satellites. As the satellites fail, these will be replaced with the Zuckerberg drones already in operation. All communications in the vast region of Africa will be known to Zuckerberg and his elite allies, who obviously include Israel. This information would be used for enslavement and control, and it is this effort that the Council of Worlds will not allow. …