Nibiru-Planet X Related and Debris

[Moderating Staff]

China’s Tiangong space station was struck by Nibiru space debris that damaged the Shenzhou‑20 return capsule, the spacecraft meant to bring three astronauts back to Earth. The Zetas predicts satellites and space stations will be destroyed.

https://t.me/ZetaTalk_Followers/78627

Skyfire—Nibiru debris, Bahia, Brazil, 27.10.25.

VIDEO: https://t.me/ZetaTalk_Followers/78598

[Lawrence]

in my truck windshield ..

object in 11 o'clock position is the X, reverse, if it were a positive image, sitting at 5 o'clock-

the other blobs at noonish are dead bug blobs.

 

yes/no?

[Selim KARABIYIK]

The recording was made on the Northern hemisphere, I think. At the time of  recording, the angle was as follows:

The angle is bound to change because the object must be moving continuously, like other heavenly bodies in the sky.

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Sorry, the same thing happened again and the comments and the pics didn't fit into one box (I don't know about the Mb limit for one comment box).

The object is seen behind a cloud and reflections cannot behave like that.

My conclusion is that this is a real object. But, I don't think it is Nibiru because it hasn't got the moons or the debris around or behind it. It can be the Dark Twin.

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Not at all, Kari, thank you. I have decided to reorganize my comments and lowered the size of some of the pictures to make them fit into one comment box.

 

Thanks Khan for the videos. I watched them several times and captured some screenshots and studied them. I noticed the following points:

1. This is a Naked Eye Observation (NEO) because reflections are caused by strong light sources (here, the sun) in the camera's processing system and one cannot try to find a reflection in the sky and zoom at
it, but he intentionally zooms at an object in the sky.

2. His hand is not stable and moves all around which would make a reflection change its position, color and density immensely, but the object remains the same apart from getting larger as a result of zooming and remains in the same position.

3. In the second video, the object is seen behind a cloud whereas reflections are on top of everything and cannot be behind anything in a photo.

And, I studied the screen shots below:

There is no reflection. Despite being behind clouds, the sun is always strong enough to create reflections.

The object is visible due to the zooming.

The object is as clear as it can be. There are no pinkish or reddish flares around it.

[Steve]

here is another I took the other day, the lens flare has a red glow around it, it is bright and moves with the lens, I tried to make it overlap the sun, but you can still see the red hue around it, but then there is still this other anomaly  at 4:00 but it looks like a lens flare to me, it is so bright, but it wasn't there before....

[Steve]

I have been careful to look at my screen and move it around until any lens flare overlaps the sun....every once in a while there is still an anomaly there.

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Beverly, it is a typical reflection one gets when the lens is aimed at the sun. I have taken pictures of the sun with my cellphone and got many of those reflections which made me think that I caught an object in the sky.

Regards

Selim

Another earlier example for the reflections.

[Nancy Lieder]

@Bea T this is a sundog. You can see the halo around the Sun, and the extra color/rainbow along the halo, classic signs. Sundogs are from ice crystals in the atmosphere, can be seen naked eye too.

[Selim KARABIYIK]

Hi Stanislav.

I studied the photos and did some experiments on them (it took quite a lot time because measuring the sides and the angles on the screen needed a lot attention). My aim was to check if the second object on the right was a real object or a second reflection in the photo. The one on the left is obviously a reflection because it disappears in the second photo. I cropped and enlarged the photos and measured the sides of the right triangles to check if my measurements and calculations were correct, considering the Pythagorean theorem. There is 1 degree change in the angles which could have been the result of my not being able to be precise enough. So, it can be said that the second object on the right is real. But, only 2 photos are not enough to reach a certain conclusion.

Selim

[Stanislav]

This photo was taken back in 2010

I decided to post it because I thought it would be useful especially since this photo was taken in Russia

PX?