Please Place your Planet X Related Captures Here

Due to the expectation of increased "Signs in the sky",

this post was created to collect videos and photos of Planet X and other related effects for better organization.
Please save your images and videos here, that other members can help with further analysis.

Always provide a source for the images you post, and if you are the source please provide the date, time and general location of your photos & videos.

Related Informations:

Planet X Personas

Second Sun

Shrouded Monster

Planet X Moon Swirls [2]

Earthquake Lights

Earthquake Clouds

Neon Swirls

Electromagnetic Swirls

Radar Circles

The Dark Twin

Dead on and Deadly

Additional Informations from the F.A.Q:
Q: What is Planet X/ Nibiru ..?
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s58.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta202.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s04.htm
More info: http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s00.htm

Q: How does the path of Planet X/ Nibiru looks like?
https://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/planet-x-path-1

Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
https://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/explaining-the-earth-wobble

Q: Why is Planet X/ Nibiru not always visible in the sky?

Planet X is seen most readily at sunrise or sunset, when light in the red spectrum curves over the horizon and the glare of white light is reduced. Red light bends most readily, and the charged dust cloud shrouding Planet X is composed primarily of red iron oxide particles.[...] The Zetas are frequently asked to pinpoint the spot where Planet X could be sighted, but it is a complicated picture! - Read more: http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue262.htm
▪ Funnled MoonSwirls [Link]
▪ When can Planet X be seen naked eye? [Link]
▪ Amateur images [Link]
▪ Second Sun in the Clouds [Link]
▪ Second Sun Visibility [Link]

Please place SOHO & STEREO and Magnetosphere images here

 

 

Comment by stephan grumbach on May 5, 2011 at 10:03am

Easy Lens Flare Testing

1.)  Make an image with your camera and identify supposed objects

2.) Start to move your finger from the sun side over the sun in front of your camera,

 3.) until your finger covers the sun, if the dot disappears it is a flare if not it is an object.  4.) Move your finger from the flare/object side to the sun if the dot appears in front of your finger it is a flare

 

Easy Reflection Testing

 

Beware of the Glare

More Video captures: https://poleshift.ning.com/video/video/listFeatured

Views: 1265381

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Selim KARABIYIK on July 10, 2011 at 12:44pm

Sorry, the same thing happened again and the comments and the pics didn't fit into one box (I don't know about the Mb limit for one comment box).

The object is seen behind a cloud and reflections cannot behave like that.

My conclusion is that this is a real object. But, I don't think it is Nibiru because it hasn't got the moons or the debris around or behind it. It can be the Dark Twin.

Comment by Selim KARABIYIK on July 10, 2011 at 12:39pm

Not at all, Kari, thank you. I have decided to reorganize my comments and lowered the size of some of the pictures to make them fit into one comment box.

 

Thanks Khan for the videos. I watched them several times and captured some screenshots and studied them. I noticed the following points:

1. This is a Naked Eye Observation (NEO) because reflections are caused by strong light sources (here, the sun) in the camera's processing system and one cannot try to find a reflection in the sky and zoom at
it, but he intentionally zooms at an object in the sky.

2. His hand is not stable and moves all around which would make a reflection change its position, color and density immensely, but the object remains the same apart from getting larger as a result of zooming and remains in the same position.

3. In the second video, the object is seen behind a cloud whereas reflections are on top of everything and cannot be behind anything in a photo.

And, I studied the screen shots below:

There is no reflection. Despite being behind clouds, the sun is always strong enough to create reflections.

The object is visible due to the zooming.

The object is as clear as it can be. There are no pinkish or reddish flares around it.

Comment by Steve on July 7, 2011 at 7:36am
here is another I took the other day, the lens flare has a red glow around it, it is bright and moves with the lens, I tried to make it overlap the sun, but you can still see the red hue around it, but then there is still this other anomaly  at 4:00 but it looks like a lens flare to me, it is so bright, but it wasn't there before....
Comment by Steve on July 7, 2011 at 7:32am
I have been careful to look at my screen and move it around until any lens flare overlaps the sun....every once in a while there is still an anomaly there.
Comment by Selim KARABIYIK on July 5, 2011 at 4:51pm

Hi Beverly, it is a typical reflection one gets when the lens is aimed at the sun. I have taken pictures of the sun with my cellphone and got many of those reflections which made me think that I caught an object in the sky.

Regards

Selim

Another earlier example for the reflections.

Comment by Nancy Lieder on June 24, 2011 at 8:27pm

@Bea T this is a sundog. You can see the halo around the Sun, and the extra color/rainbow along the halo, classic signs. Sundogs are from ice crystals in the atmosphere, can be seen naked eye too.

Comment by Selim KARABIYIK on June 22, 2011 at 10:56pm

Hi Stanislav.

I studied the photos and did some experiments on them (it took quite a lot time because measuring the sides and the angles on the screen needed a lot attention). My aim was to check if the second object on the right was a real object or a second reflection in the photo. The one on the left is obviously a reflection because it disappears in the second photo. I cropped and enlarged the photos and measured the sides of the right triangles to check if my measurements and calculations were correct, considering the Pythagorean theorem. There is 1 degree change in the angles which could have been the result of my not being able to be precise enough. So, it can be said that the second object on the right is real. But, only 2 photos are not enough to reach a certain conclusion.

Selim

Comment by Stanislav on June 16, 2011 at 10:29am


This photo was taken back in 2010

I decided to post it because I thought it would be useful especially since this photo was taken in Russia

PX?

Comment by Nancy Lieder on June 12, 2011 at 2:22pm

I spend some time on the Hungary video, which shows reflection in the water. Ordinarily a reflection on the water is proof of a valid capture BUT there are several reflections of the Sun in the vid, falling down and to the right of the Sun. The way the Sun's reflection on the water happens, as a fat reflection, shows that the Sun is also reflected on the water just straight down, as presented earlier in this discussion.

Here the reflection on the water from "PX" is set out from the land aways, where the reflection from the Sun starts at the distant shore. This would be the case if this was all a camera ghost set slightly to the right and down a bit.

This is confirmed by snaps from other days (presented by others) which show the Sun's reflection on the water to be FAT at a midpoint. A reflection is normally an even strip. I think there are TWO ghosts, one offset to the right and down, and another simply DOWN, because of this fat ghost.

Tempting as this Hungary video was, I must conclude these are ghosts in the camera! Darn.

Comment by Recall 15 on June 12, 2011 at 7:04am
The Elusive Dark Twin behind the Moon:
-Lower left side:

Time: 10:45 CT June 11 2011
Iso 400
Exposure 2 seconds @ 22.5 mm aperture

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!