Due to the expectation of increased "Signs in the sky",
this post was created to collect videos and photos of Planet X and other related effects for better organization.
Please save your images and videos here, that other members can help with further analysis.
Always provide a source for the images you post, and if you are the source please provide the date, time and general location of your photos & videos.
Related Informations: |
Additional Informations from the F.A.Q: Q: How does the path of Planet X/ Nibiru looks like? Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"? Q: Why is Planet X/ Nibiru not always visible in the sky? Planet X is seen most readily at sunrise or sunset, when light in the red spectrum curves over the horizon and the glare of white light is reduced. Red light bends most readily, and the charged dust cloud shrouding Planet X is composed primarily of red iron oxide particles.[...] The Zetas are frequently asked to pinpoint the spot where Planet X could be sighted, but it is a complicated picture! - Read more: http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue262.htm |
Please place SOHO & STEREO and Magnetosphere images here
Comment by stephan grumbach on May 5, 2011 at 10:03am
Easy Lens Flare Testing
Easy Reflection Testing
Beware of the Glare
More Video captures: https://poleshift.ning.com/video/video/listFeatured
Comment
Sorry, the same thing happened again and the comments and the pics didn't fit into one box (I don't know about the Mb limit for one comment box).
The object is seen behind a cloud and reflections cannot behave like that.
My conclusion is that this is a real object. But, I don't think it is Nibiru because it hasn't got the moons or the debris around or behind it. It can be the Dark Twin.
Not at all, Kari, thank you. I have decided to reorganize my comments and lowered the size of some of the pictures to make them fit into one comment box.
Thanks Khan for the videos. I watched them several times and captured some screenshots and studied them. I noticed the following points:
1. This is a Naked Eye Observation (NEO) because reflections are caused by strong light sources (here, the sun) in the camera's processing system and one cannot try to find a reflection in the sky and zoom at
it, but he intentionally zooms at an object in the sky.
2. His hand is not stable and moves all around which would make a reflection change its position, color and density immensely, but the object remains the same apart from getting larger as a result of zooming and remains in the same position.
3. In the second video, the object is seen behind a cloud whereas reflections are on top of everything and cannot be behind anything in a photo.
And, I studied the screen shots below:
There is no reflection. Despite being behind clouds, the sun is always strong enough to create reflections.
The object is visible due to the zooming.
The object is as clear as it can be. There are no pinkish or reddish flares around it.
Hi Stanislav.
I studied the photos and did some experiments on them (it took quite a lot time because measuring the sides and the angles on the screen needed a lot attention). My aim was to check if the second object on the right was a real object or a second reflection in the photo. The one on the left is obviously a reflection because it disappears in the second photo. I cropped and enlarged the photos and measured the sides of the right triangles to check if my measurements and calculations were correct, considering the Pythagorean theorem. There is 1 degree change in the angles which could have been the result of my not being able to be precise enough. So, it can be said that the second object on the right is real. But, only 2 photos are not enough to reach a certain conclusion.
Selim
I spend some time on the Hungary video, which shows reflection in the water. Ordinarily a reflection on the water is proof of a valid capture BUT there are several reflections of the Sun in the vid, falling down and to the right of the Sun. The way the Sun's reflection on the water happens, as a fat reflection, shows that the Sun is also reflected on the water just straight down, as presented earlier in this discussion.
Here the reflection on the water from "PX" is set out from the land aways, where the reflection from the Sun starts at the distant shore. This would be the case if this was all a camera ghost set slightly to the right and down a bit.
This is confirmed by snaps from other days (presented by others) which show the Sun's reflection on the water to be FAT at a midpoint. A reflection is normally an even strip. I think there are TWO ghosts, one offset to the right and down, and another simply DOWN, because of this fat ghost.
Tempting as this Hungary video was, I must conclude these are ghosts in the camera! Darn.
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
Switch to the Mobile Optimized View
© 2024 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by
You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!
Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift