Note the location of “Planet 9” and the inbound path for Nibiru provided by the Zetas in 1997. Nibiru arrived, right on schedule in 2003, and right where predicted a full 7 years earlier. Where the Zetas provided the location of the gravity draw represented by the Sun’s dark unlit binary and the inbound Nibiru in 1983, when the IRAS team lofted its infra-red balloon in search of the inbound Nibiru, this location was not provided to the public. All articles in print at that time only referring to the location as the “western edge of the constellation Orion”, quite vague, and the “western edge” is vast. Yet the Zetas pinpointed the location as being just outside the lower bow of Orion. Such is the accuracy of ZetaTalk. How would the public eventually become “aware of the history and accuracy of ZetaTalk predictions” as predicted by the Zetas on April 16, 2016? ? It would seem this is already in process.
SOZT March 19, 2016
So what happened to the announcement? Obama lacked the courage. As a result of this colossal failure, having to disband the Jade Helm structure, the US military reacted. Obama is no longer running the country. Chief of Staff General Dunford is. Ben Fulford has for months been referring to Obama as the US “spokesperson”. Is this true, and how does this work? In that the Middle East, under the direction and press from Israel, Turkey, the Jewish bankers of the Federal Reserve, and the Saudis were supporting ISIS and this threatened to create a force that would not only invade Europe but also create an endless terrorism threat to the US, the military did indeed effect a silent coup. Russia needed to enter the fray, and Dunford, but not Obama, agreed. This will never be admitted, publicly, nor do the parties want this.
EOZT
SOZT October 1, 2015
The three major social media outlets in use around the globe all had significant, and simultaneous outages between September 20-24, 2015. Skype had complaints from the UK, Australia, and Japan. Twitter received reports from the US, Australia, and Singapore. FaceBook had the loudest howls, primarily from the US and Europe. Notably these downtimes, some lasting for hours or even days, got no attention in the major media, and there was no real explanation for the outages. Every Skype user has an account and a password, as do their contacts. Every Skype user can broadcast messages to their contacts, even if these contacts are not presently online. Every twitter use likewise has an account and a password, and by sending a tweet passes information along to subscribers, who can retweet the info in the future. FaceBook users likewise have an account and a password, with many friends who pick up info from each other and pass it along on their FaceBook accounts. In all of this, the networks themselves are AWARE of the accounts and passwords, and could do a broadcast to all in the event of an announcement. Check your user agreements. This is legal!
EOZT
SOZT April 25, 2015
When we announced that the Council of Worlds would be going to war with the elite over their blockage of the announcement, the tools available to the Council were not immediately apparent. Early in the campaign the Sony hack showed one such mechanism, whereby an anonymous hacker revealed embarrassing information about Sony executives. Similarly exposing pedophile activities by Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton and blatant lies by self-promoting media talking heads such as Brian Williams and Bill O’Reilly required nothing more than encouraging contactees to step forward. In many, many cases a financial loss sufficient to trigger a clash among the elite is a result of an electronic delay during trades.
EOZT
SOZT July 4, 2015
What is the message here? As with other failed launches, this most recent failure is a definitive message from the Council of Worlds. Space X has had success in resupplying the ISS, though has flounded on landing on a floating ocean platform. Resupply of the ISS is OK, reuse of their launch equipment so as to help the elite escape, not OK. The message now is that the elite should not expect to get into space at all. No escape. The message here is to take all hope away from such plans among the elite. They are to remain on Earth with the common man. We expect the battle to shift from attempts to block the announcement, or deny its meaning, to attempts to enslave the common man in some way. That is another fight, on another day.
EOZT
SOZT November 1, 2014
The elite – the wealthy and politically powerful in the world – have continued in their attempts to thwart the announcement by Obama and his partners admitting that Nibiru, aka Planet X exists. We have long stated that the announcement date was set by Obama and Xi at their June 7-8, 2013 meeting in Santa Monica. The flustered slip given by the French Foreign Minister on May 13, 2014 re “500 days
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/17ma2014.htm
until climate chaos” was in reference to this, as the date set was to be 500 days from the 2013 meeting, ie October 20, 2014.
EOZT
SOZT November 8, 2014
Relying solely on Russia or China to proceed would get the truth out BUT since the block had always been on the US end, via Reagan’s national security directive, without a confirmation from Obama this is awkward and subject to being countered. If true, where is the confirmation from Obama? It would be packaged as some odd communist attack against Obama going into the elections, to make him seem weak, almost comical. So where is this going now? For us to comment would be to empower the enemy, which of course we will not do. Your curiosity is not as important as having the announcement succeed.
EOZT
SOZT December 10, 2014
We have stated that the public will see only the flash and parry of swords from a distance during the Council of Worlds war with the cover-up crowd. Meanwhile, periodic tests of the Emergency Broadcast System in the US are done, to see if the channels are open. As of this writing, they are not yet open. The war is still on, full press. Meanwhile, during the flash and parry of swords, one can see resistance, pleading, panic, and capitulation.
EOZT
Comment
The vice president is alleged to have played a big part behind the scenes of Friday's controversial vote
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/28/joe-biden-reportedly-played-an-impo...
Although the United States abstained from Friday’s controversial UN vote condemning Israeli expansion into Palestinian land, a new story is emerging claiming that Vice President Joe Biden personally called the president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, in order to convince his country to vote “yes” on the resolution.
“Did Biden put pressure on the Ukrainians? Categorically yes,” said an anonymous highly-placed Israeli government official with strong connections to Ukraine in an interview with Tablet Magazine on Tuesday. “That Biden told them to do it is a thousand percent true.”
Both parties have officially acknowledged that a phone call between Biden and Poroshenko occurred on Dec. 19, although the Poroshenko administration’s official statement failed to mention the settlement vote, and Biden’s national security adviser, Colin Kahl, has denied it.
The article also claimed, based on a discussion with an American national security source, that the Obama administration needed a 14-0 vote on the resolution in order to improve the so-called “optics” of its own decision to abstain. Multiple sources told Tablet that the Biden-Poroshenko phone call was only one part of a much larger campaign to pressure Ukraine into voting “Yes” because Ukraine allegedly wanted to postpone the vote by several days as a gesture to the Israelis. This is said to have included America’s ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, speaking directly to Ukraine’s UN ambassador.
ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for December 31, 2016
Israeli UN flap
http://zetatalk.com/ning/31de2016.htm
Ben Fulford talks about the Bush/Clinton/Netanyahu crime families, referring to this group as a Mafia. Herbert Bush got wealthy having the CIA bring cocaine in from Colombia. The Clinton’s cooperated with these drug flights while in Arkansas, and when Hillary was Secretary of State, she raked in the cash via pay for play arrangement. Netanyahu’s role throughout was to use his Mossad for various manipulations in the political arena, from Charlie Hebdo’s death to the false claim that Assad used chemical weapons. All these publicly known incidents are just a sampling of the crimes done by this cabal.
It has recently been in the news that a C-130 plane circled over Denver and another over New York City. These were both either blocking submarine nukes from being activated or blocking dirty nukes from being set off. Yes, the cabal has used their possession of US or Israeli nukes to threaten Obama, thus his seeming support of Hillary, whom he hates, and cooperation with Netanyahu over Palestinian settlements. The tide, obviously, has turned.
https://www.scribd.com/document/334628996/FBI-Partial-Unseal-Hillar...
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/breaking-judge-orders-fbi-to-partia...
The FBI’s planned disclosure is directly related to an effort by well-known attorney Los Angeles attorney E. Randol Schoenberg, who filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice that sought the “immediate disclosure of the FBI search warrant for the e-mails of Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.”
One of the main points of contention in this case was the privacy right of Clinton — or any person who wasn’t ultimately charged with a crime. However, the judge determined that essentially all went out the window given the bizarre nature of the case including FBI Director James Comey’s very public press conference. After Comey’s remarks, Clinton then decided to publicly respond at campaign rallies. Thus, the judge determined Clinton essentially waived her privacy right arguments that the uncharged subject of an investigation typically can rely on.
In the words of the judge, Clinton has “little remaining privacy interest in the release of
documents identifying her as the subject of the investigation.”
In Monday’s order, the judge ultimately concluded:
The search warrant, the application for the search warrant, the affidavit in support of the application for the search warrant, and the search warrant return will be unsealed and posted on the Court’s electronic case filing system under the docket number listed above, subject to the redactions discussed above, at noon on December 20, 2016, unless
an order is issued before then by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit staying or modifying this Order.
LawNewz.com obtained a copy of the order and is in the process of reviewing it.
READ the Order:
FBI Partial Unseal Hillary Email by LawNewz on Scribd
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-19/electoral-college-update-w...
It's finally over: Donald Trump has secured 304 Electoral Votes following the Texas vote (with 2 faithless electors), officially securing the presidency of the United States. Of course, the now official President-Elect Trump took to twitter to confirm the victory:
We did it! Thank you to all of my great supporters, we just officially won the election (despite all of the distorted and inaccurate media).
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2016
Texas' 36 electoral votes for Trump pushed him over the edge at around 4:30 Central Time, even though two rogue electors' defections deprived Trump of one of those votes. That gave Trump 304 total electoral votes.
A quick recap of the day's events from the WSJ:
Members of the Electoral College meeting in state capitals across the country on Monday confirmed President-elect Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 election, ending a last-ditch campaign to deny him the presidency. Mr. Trump amassed at least 270 electoral votes on Monday afternoon—enough to officially become the president-elect over his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, according to a tally of votes by the Associated Press.
Typically just a formality, this year’s Electoral College vote attracted an outsize amount of attention after a group of mostly Democratic electors made a late push to block Mr. Trump’s path to the White House. They argued the Electoral College had a constitutional duty to act independently of the will of the voters in extraordinary circumstances. Protesters gathered in several state capitols across the country to encourage electors to reject Mr. Trump.
Four Democratic electors in Washington state broke ranks—with three casting ballots for former Secretary of State Colin Powell, and one for Native American activist Faith Spotted Eagle. In the vice presidential vote, the Washington vote was even more unusual, with electors casting votes for a trio of female U.S. senators: Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Maria Cantwell of Washington and Susan Collins of Maine. Another elector cast a ballot for Winona LaDuke, an environmental activist.
Several other attempts by electors to cast ballots failed. The Associated Press reported that attempts by Democratic electors in Colorado and Maine to vote for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders failed. In Maine, the elector was ordered to vote again, while in Colorado an elector was replaced.
The final count:
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-19/best-election-map-yet
http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/745197/IMF-Christine-Lagarde-...
The former French finance minister was today convicted by a French court over the so-called Tapie payment but has not been handed a sentence.
During the case, the IMF supported Ms Lagarde's position as leader, but her role is in doubt following the guilty verdict.
The conviction is a huge embarrassment for the American-based IMF after former head Dominique Strauss-Kahn was forced to quit in 2011 amid sexual assault allegations.
A crisis meeting over Ms Lagarde's continued leadership of the fund is now set to be held by the Washington-based board.
The top judge in Ms Lagarde's trial said the IMF head was negligent for not seeking to overturn an arbitration ruling in 2008, which had awarded the huge compensation payment to Bernard Tapie.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/wikileaks-tweets-email-leak...
Wikileaks keeps telling the world who the leaker was— Liberal media keeps ignoring them.
In early November Wikileaks founder Julian Assange categorically denied that the troves of US Democratic Party and Clinton work and staff emails released this year came from the Russian government.
Assange: The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.
-----------------------------
An example of Liberal Media...?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-14/us-accuses-vladimir-putin-...
And just like that the narrative of Russia hacking the presidential election has escalated to the highest possible level, and has officially jumped the shark.
Moments ago, following a month-long barrage of unsubstantiated stories in the press accusing the Russian government of indirectly hacking the US presidential election, which culminated with last night's 8,000 word NYT expose, and which followed a schism between the FBI and CIA, in which the former disputed the latter's "fuzzy and ambiguous" claims that Russia sought to influence the presidential elections, moments ago the NBC News reported that U.S. intelligence officials believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election.
Perhaps because the official narrative has so far been unable to gather traction with the previous "shotgun approach" in which just "Russia" was accused of handing the election to Trump, four short days before the Electoral College vote, the narrative has changed and it now involves the very pinnacle of Russia's government: the president himself.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/12/13928844/spacex-crew-dragon-dela...
In the wake of its September 1st rocket explosion, SpaceX has officially delayed the first crewed flight of its Crew Dragon vehicle — the capsule that the company is building to take NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Originally planned for late 2017, the first flight of the Crew Dragon with people on board is now slated to take place in May of 2018, according to a NASA blog post. Prior to that flight, SpaceX will perform a demonstration mission of Crew Dragon in November 2017 — a flight that won’t include any astronauts.
NASA must rely on Russia a little bit longer for getting people to the space station
The longer it takes for NASA to fly on the Commercial Crew vehicles, though, the longer the space agency must rely on Russia for getting people to the International Space Station. Currently the Russian Soyuz rocket is the only vehicle that can take astronauts to the ISS. It’s an expensive way to get astronauts to space, as one seat on the Soyuz costs NASA roughly $81 million. It also means NASA doesn’t have any other options for sending humans to space. That’s a scary prospect, especially since the Soyuz just experienced a failure during an uncrewed mission to the space station last week.
The Crew Dragon delay is also one of many that SpaceX has experienced following its September 1st rocket explosion. The company was forced to ground all of its Falcon 9 flights as it investigated the accident, and the first flight of the Falcon Heavy — a larger variant of the Falcon 9 — had to be pushed back from the end of this year to early next year. SpaceX was hoping to return to flight on December 16th, but that launch has since slipped to early January. The delays have prompted one customer to launch on another rocket.
http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/12/11/news-flash-spacex-no-longe...
On Sept. 1, a SpaceX rocket blew up on its launch pad while undergoing routine testing at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. SpaceX hasn't launched one single rocket since the disaster, and now says it won't resume launching before January 2017 at the earliest.
If you think this sounds like bad news for SpaceX's business, you're right. In fact, it's probably even worse news than you know.
As a privately held company, SpaceX is not required to file financial disclosures of its revenue, its profits, or its losses with the SEC. Just because it isn't required to tell people how it's doing financially, however, doesn't mean that SpaceX won't voluntarily toot its own horn from time to time.
For example, back when things were going well for SpaceX -- say, circa June 2016 -- the company regularly tweeted out a string of announcements of successful rocket launches, rocket landings, and product improvements to its space fleet.
At the same time, front and center on its website, SpaceX boasted of how well its business was doing. SpaceX had "70 launches on its manifest," and was launching much more often than its rivals at United Launch Alliance (the Boeing (NYSE:BA) - Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) joint venture) or Airbus (NASDAQOTH:EADSY) subsidiary Arianespace. SpaceX was moving steadily toward fulfilling "over $10 billion in contracts" over the next few years, and booking more of them all the time. Best of all, just like Ariane and ULA, SpaceX was "profitable and cash-flow positive."
But a funny thing happened on the way to SpaceX's website update a few months ago. Without warning or explanation, the assertion that SpaceX is "profitable and cash-flow positive" suddenly vanished.
SpaceX's "About" SpaceX webpage today continues to boast of "70 future missions on its manifest," and still says those missions are worth "over $10 billion." But sometime between 6:25 a.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 20, 2016, and 9:23 a.m. on Sept. 22, the assertion that SpaceX is "profitable and cash-flow positive" was scrubbed from the website.
Why might that be?
We actually discussed this -- and came very close to predicting it -- just last month, when discussing SpaceX's latest plan to launch 4,425 broadband internet satellites into orbit. And it goes like this:
Add it up, and SpaceX has actually only been launching rockets for about nine months of the past 21. Earning roughly $72 million per launch, it's put together perhaps $650 million in revenue from those launches. But according to Elon Musk himself (from an internal SpaceX email dated June 2013, reprinted in Ashlee Vance's biography of the CEO) the company has expenses of "roughly $800 million to $900 million" a year. Over 21 months, that works out to approximately $650 million in revenue, versus perhaps $1.5 billion in expenses.
Translation: SpaceX is not cash flow positive today. Neither is it profitable.
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2025 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by
You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!
Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift