Dropped Quakes (more quakes disappear)

[Howard]

On April 14, 2012, four significant quakes were indicated in Canada on the ANF recent earthquake map as of 22:56 UTC that were not reported by USGS, EMSC or Earthquakes Canada.  Within several minutes, only a single quake remained on the map in the center of Hudson Bay, and shortly thereafter, it too, was no longer indicated. 

The times of these quakes were between 19:39 and 19:46 UTC with magnitudes 6.1, 6.0, 5.2 and 5.0

Below are screen shots of the quake statistics:

Special thanks to Sevan Makaracı for the following screenshot:

SOZT

These were duly reported quakes because the seismographs recorded the signature of a quake. The N American continent is being pulled into a bow, as mining accidents across the midsection from Utah to West Virginia, sinkholes across the midsection from Tennessee to Pennsylvania, Seaway booms and hums from Ontario to Wisconsin and Michigan, and earthquakes from Acapulco to Seattle have shown. This process has accelerated, and as the booms in Wisconsin have shown, the ripping apart of the Seaway is a major focus. More than the land in the line of rip along the Seaway is involved.

 

So why would the northern swath of Canada suddenly have these dropped quakes? Note the swath of lakes just under the line drawn by the dropped quakes. From Lake Superior to Lake Winnipeg to the Great Slave lake to the Great Bear Lake these lakes are there because this land has been PULLED APART during prior Pole Shifts. The bowing of the N American continent is a regular feature of prior Pole Shifts. Before the Seaway spreads, this region of lakes is stretched, and drops in elevation. The region where the dropped quakes were recorded is stretched FIRST, and tearing rock recorded as earthquakes.

 

Why would the USGS and their cohorts so quickly drop these quakes? Such quakes have been dropped regularly over the past decade, especially since Planet X entered the inner solar system. If out in the ocean, or in a poorly populated area, just dropped. If hiding them cannot succeed dumbing them down to a lower magnitude or combining them into a single quake is done. This was a risky move, as there were SEVERAL quakes, already announced officially, but such risks will increasingly be taken as the quake frequency and severity increase. If challenged, it was just a mechanical problem with the equipment.

EOZT

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for April 21, 2012

[Kyle Rieth]

More earthquakes dropped as the day goes on.  There was a 6.1 and a 5.9 in Germany which are going unreported! Surely someone had to have felt it.

[Kyle Rieth]

9 large quakes dropped from ANF today, see details below.  Also none of these have been reported by the USGS.

[Howard]

Another dropped 5.6 "domino effect" quake recorded 13 minutes after a 5.6 quake along the Western Indian - Antarctic Ridge.

[Howard]

Another one, this time along the St. Lawrence and within minutes of a 4.9 in Bulgaria.

[Howard]

Another dropped quake in Canada, within minutes of the 5.8 in Bulgaria.  It's become clear the motivation behind dropped quakes is not only minimizing EQ statistics, but also disassociating the domino effect of nearly simultaneous quakes occurring across vast distances.

[Kyle Rieth]

Dropped quakes in the Caribbean and Mexico.

[Kyle Rieth]

More quakes disappear today!

[Kyle Rieth]

[Kyle Rieth]

There were two earthquakes a day or two ago in northern Canada that were M5.0 and M5.6.  They stayed there for a day or so, so I didn't get a screen capture of them assuming they would not be dropped.  But sure enough they are no longer being reported on ANF as of a couple of hours ago.  Here are the approximate locations going off of memory, with the southern mark being the M5.0 and the northern on M5.6.

[Kyle Rieth]

Colombian quake dropped from ANF today