Dropped Quakes (more quakes disappear)

[Howard]

On April 14, 2012, four significant quakes were indicated in Canada on the ANF recent earthquake map as of 22:56 UTC that were not reported by USGS, EMSC or Earthquakes Canada.  Within several minutes, only a single quake remained on the map in the center of Hudson Bay, and shortly thereafter, it too, was no longer indicated. 

The times of these quakes were between 19:39 and 19:46 UTC with magnitudes 6.1, 6.0, 5.2 and 5.0

Below are screen shots of the quake statistics:

Special thanks to Sevan Makaracı for the following screenshot:

SOZT

These were duly reported quakes because the seismographs recorded the signature of a quake. The N American continent is being pulled into a bow, as mining accidents across the midsection from Utah to West Virginia, sinkholes across the midsection from Tennessee to Pennsylvania, Seaway booms and hums from Ontario to Wisconsin and Michigan, and earthquakes from Acapulco to Seattle have shown. This process has accelerated, and as the booms in Wisconsin have shown, the ripping apart of the Seaway is a major focus. More than the land in the line of rip along the Seaway is involved.

 

So why would the northern swath of Canada suddenly have these dropped quakes? Note the swath of lakes just under the line drawn by the dropped quakes. From Lake Superior to Lake Winnipeg to the Great Slave lake to the Great Bear Lake these lakes are there because this land has been PULLED APART during prior Pole Shifts. The bowing of the N American continent is a regular feature of prior Pole Shifts. Before the Seaway spreads, this region of lakes is stretched, and drops in elevation. The region where the dropped quakes were recorded is stretched FIRST, and tearing rock recorded as earthquakes.

 

Why would the USGS and their cohorts so quickly drop these quakes? Such quakes have been dropped regularly over the past decade, especially since Planet X entered the inner solar system. If out in the ocean, or in a poorly populated area, just dropped. If hiding them cannot succeed dumbing them down to a lower magnitude or combining them into a single quake is done. This was a risky move, as there were SEVERAL quakes, already announced officially, but such risks will increasingly be taken as the quake frequency and severity increase. If challenged, it was just a mechanical problem with the equipment.

EOZT

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for April 21, 2012

[Howard]

A few dropped quakes in the Pacific following today's 6.7 quake off Africa.

[Kyle Rieth]

A M4.9 struck Cuba today and was left unreported.

[Howard]

2 more quakes dropped from ANF that were recorded within 10 minutes of today's 5.1 quake near the Volcano Islands.

[Kyle Rieth]

More dropped quakes.

[Kyle Rieth]

Here are some recently dropped quakes.  There were two more today at the mouth of the St. lawrence seaway.

[Howard]

Pair of quakes dropped from ANF today: a 4.5 at the mouth of the St Lawrence recorded 3 minutes after the 4.7 quake along the Mid-Atlantic Rift, and a 5.1 in the north Pacific after today's 6.4 quake off Japan.

[Kyle Rieth]

M4.7 and M5.5 quakes were recorded in Canada today and have since been removed from ANF.

[Kyle Rieth]

Today's dropped quakes, a M5.2 in the North Pacific and a M5.0 just off of Greenland.

[Kyle Rieth]

Earthquake recently dropped in the North Pacific.

[Kyle Rieth]

There was one more quake dropped in southern Mexico that was M4.4.  Also here is the data on the M5.1 that you mentioned.