Main Establishment Lies

The Establishment Lies ban includes:

  • blaming solar/sun acitivity of any kind (solar flares, sunspots, coronal mass ejections "CME")
  • Anything about earth changes being caused by the magnetic poles moving or shifting (a SYMPTOM of the near presence of Planet X, NOT the cause of any earth changes whatsoever)


  • The Extinction Protocol/Alvin Conway blog/site (an arm of the cover-up, servicing the Establishment; debunks Planet X; ZetaTalk about The Extinction Protocol)

  • Watts (global warming lies)

  • Martell (debunking, alternative theories)

  • Masters (debunking, alternative Planet X theory)
  • Earth Changes Media/Mitch Battros (debunking, blame everything on the sun site)
  • Faal (David Booth debunking site)
  • Knight-Jadczyk (allows debunking of ZetaTalk, Planet X does not exist; does not admit it is Planet X causing all or most of the earth changes and signs in the sky they report)

  • Plait (a long-time shill and Planet X debunker)
  • Dutchsinse videos (debunker)

  • David Wilcock (a fake and phony, strong profit motive; ZetaTalk about David Wilcock)
  • John Moore (Planet X is real but otherwise a debunker; profit motive; ZetaTalk about John Moore)
  • Project Camelot (Establishment Lies and disinfo; ZetaTalk about Project Camelot)
  • James McCanney (Planet X is real but otherwise a debunker; profit motive; ZetaTalk mentions James McCanney)
  • "32° of insanity"/aka Donny Gillson (trying to jump on the Planet X bandwagon after repeatedly insisting Planet X/Nibiru is not real)
  • Marshall Masters (shill; profit motive; ZetaTalk mentions Marshall Masters)
  • Phil Plait (willing shill and debunker; "bad astronomy" on his part for claiming Planet X is not real; profit motive; ZetaTalk Newsletter mentions Phil Plait)
  • Mitch Battros (willing shill who blames the sun and stated Planet X is not real; profit motive; ZetaTalk about Mitch Battros

"For the 'planet-x' community, I will go on record once again to say, I have seen no evidence whatsoever which would indicate a planet the size of Earth or even the size of a simple large asteroid (5 miles diameter) anywhere in or near our system. Those of you who believe in the zeta cult will just keep on believing.)"



As per the Premise and rules:

  1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to a ban. If you do intend to embrace any main establishment lies you will be suspended without any explanation. REASON paid debunking teams can completely disrupt discussion, as has occurred elsewhere.


Did you get the Establishment's memo?


"Earth Changes and the Pole Shift" and ZetaTalk® have been striving to inform you about the upcoming cataclysms, with the truth.

The Establishment, people in positions of power and intimately responsible for the current status quo, do not want it to be that way. They are busy trotting along their lies through their minions around the internet, including this Ning and other means of mass communication, by using agents of disinformation.

If you have just arrived to the Earth Changes and the Pole Shift, we intend to help you sort out the wheat from the chaff when it comes to the reality of Planet X, what it's doing to our planet Earth, and discard what you will soon find out are lies you were told.

But. . . does NASA lie? You might ask . . .

But some people still doubt:

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for October 30, 2010:

NASA has acknowledged that Solar Cycle 24 can result in large solar storms that could be catastrophic for humanity. The Zetas have said that NASA blamed the sun and will not admit that the magnetic disturbances are generated by the planet X. If NASA knows something and has hinted that information, we may deduce that they have calculated the passage of Planet X in those years. ( ) I wonder: Absolutely all the information supplied by NASA's solar flares in 2012-2013 and the consequences on earth are lies to hide the real causes?

There are many ways to lie, and NASA uses all these means. One lies by boldface statements that are lies, and NASA does this by openly stating that Planet X is a rumor and not a reality. So given that, why would you even be asking if what they say about the Sun is truth? Because they mix truth with fiction, which is yet another way to lie. Of course there are solar cycles every 10.7 years or so, the last solar maximum occurring in March, 2000. Do the math! At present you should be into the next solar maximum. It should be now. But are you having massive CME's as occurred in the year 2000? No! This photo is of a year 2000 CME, X class. In order to hype the 2012 lie, that nothing will happen until December 21, 2012, NASA moved the date of the solar maximum to 2012, yet another lie. At present, because amateurs have scopes and can view the face of the Sun, NASA cannot simply invent a large CME, but this does not keep them from getting in to the news, prognosticating that the Sun is about to explode into activity, because they are frantic to blame the Sun for the Earth changes. This, despite the fact that this solar cycle is so sleeply, with such a lack of sunspots, that it is almost breaking all records.

When their own images and archives show the presence of Planet X they allowed their archives to be doctored to appear that these anomalies on the SOHO images have been present all along. Inserting erroneous data is a lie too, but they have not stopped at the SOHO doctoring, as doctoring the SOHO background of stars and planets has been a practice since 2003 when the Earth stopped in her orbit. Edit lines, evidence of cutting and pasting, have been present since 2003 also. Silly explanations for evidence of Planet X in the solar system is also not beyond NASA, who will say anything but the truth on this matter. When the Moons of Planet X appeared on solar images, and the issue went viral on the Internet, NASA declared them a "compression artifact". The irrepressible Moon Swirls of Planet X showing up on the SOHO images were claimed as asteroid collisions only recently caught on film by NASA, or so they said. So you are asking if you should discount everything NASA says about the Sun or pending solar storms? With a track record like this, the question should be why any intelligent person believes anything they say! Do you not have a brain? Are you endlessly gullible? Do you lack evidence of their lies? And given that the larger the lie, the more reluctant the liar is to admit their guilt, do you expect NASA to change? We presume the answer is obvious.


The following article appeared in Mainich Shinbune, a major newspaper in Japan, on April 20, 2012 

The article suggests the Sun's magnetic structure is changing from a dipole (N. Pole – S. Pole) to a "quadrupole structure" where the arctic and antarctic poles each contain two poles, all with North Pole characteristics, while the Sun's equator region contains the associated South Pole characteristics, as illustrated below.

The article further suggests this phenomena may result in cooling of the Earth, or "temporary suppression of global warming".

English translation of the article

Clearly, this is yet another Main Establishment Lie feebly attempting to blame the Sun for the many severe magnetosphere deformations observed on the NICT magnetosphere simulator, as well as the COW's fabulously orchestrated magnetosphere reversal that occurred in March of this year.  It is no coincidence this article appears in Japan's mainstream press given the abrupt termination of Japan's NICT MagSim immediately after the infamous magnetosphere reversal.

As recorded in the magnetosphere deformations blog, Earth's magnetosphere has been undergoing severe compressions with increasing frequency since 2009 and during a period of unusual dormancy in the Sun's 11-year magnetic activity cycle. 

The Zetas have long predicted the Establishment would blame the Sun for the many abnormalities visited upon the Earth by the unstoppable approach of Planet X.  This is simply another example of Zetas Right Again!

Below is a compilation of Weekly ZetaTalk Newsletters that address the many aberrations of Earth's magnetosphere caused by Planet X.

May 15, 2011

Dec 12, 2010

Dec 5, 2010

August 8, 2010

April 18, 2010

November 8, 2009

August 2, 2009 and this one has detail on how it does NOT correlate with solar activity.

May 23, 2009

December 21, 2008

July 13, 2008 including an article claiming Earth field just went whacky "since 2003"



When Lies Fail -

"It’s the Sun dummy!"

"It’s Global Warming"

Blaming Earthquakes on the Weather and Global Warming, ZetaTalk Written Apr 21, 2006:

Do hurricanes cause earthquakes?

As Nancy has been stating, excuses that they can point to are desperately needed. They have used global warming and solar activity as their mainstays, announcing this over the years that the sun was very active and that global warming was proceeding faster than the models predicted. So how can they explain earthquakes, how can they explain increased volcanic activity just as with the face and dark global shuttering that is following along the lines of what we have explained and pointed to. They have no explanation that fits with global warming or with solar activity. You can either ignore it or you can try to twist what's happening into a global warming explanation. Well this is an example of that being done. The weather can be pointed to as a global warming phenomenon. Air heats up and the turmoil increases and this affects the weather and the weather creates earthquakes. That's why we have a rise in earthquakes. Good try fellas but if that were the case then why was there no correlation mentioned in all the many centuries before. It's a false connection.

One of those preferred lies, and one that had been long in the planning, is the Solar Flare/Super Electromagnetic storm theory:

NASA's Cover:
Frantic to maintain their cover story, that the Earth changes are caused by the Sun and not a mythical Planet X - NASA immediately grabbed media attention with predictions for what they called a "solar tsunami". At this point in the solar cycle, the Sun is approaching the solar maximum, and should be having sunspots and CMEs, and a C3 class flare is a minor affair. Yet in using a word like "tsunami" in the media, NASA's predictions implied something dire.

Aurora Borealis Activity likely August 3/4, 2010 from Solar Coronal Mass Ejection
August 2, 2010
NASA announced the discovery of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) on August 1, 2010. The CME resulted from a class C3 solar flare and was aimed towards Earth. The coronal mass ejection should reach Earth on the night of August 3/4, 2010. The CME will cause a higher than normal possibility of aurora, also called northern lights, activity on the evening of August 3 and the morning of August 4.

Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity
August 1, 2010
Geomagnetic field activity is expected to be at quiet levels during most of day 1 (02 August). An increase to unsettled to active levels is expected late on day 1 due to the arrival of the full-halo CME observed on 01 August. Activity is expected to increase to unsettled to active levels with a chance for minor storm levels on day 2 (03 August) as CME effects persist. Activity is expected to decrease to quiet to unsettled levels with a chance for active levels on day 3 (04 August) as CME effects subside.

Per the Zetas, NASA was risking a flop by this media barrage, but unless the public would associate any electromagnetic disturbance with the Sun, their cover story risked being debunked. Since a C3 event is tiny, as solar flares go, they immediately took their SOHO satellites offline for "bakeout" maintenance so the non-event could not be viewed. Compare the August 1, 2010 C3 with an X class flare that occurred during the last solar maximum in 2000. See the difference?

ZetaTalk Prediction 3/6/2010: The excuses they planned to use were to blame the Sun for any electromagnetic problems, and they still plan to do so even though the severe interference with the Earth's magnetosphere started while the Sun was virtually asleep. They will grasp at every minor CME as proof of this theory. They had planned to blame rogue asteroids or asteroid swarms for the moons and debris in the tail of Planet X, and have already mustered this excuse forth, claiming that asteroids crash into each other producing dust clouds. Thus, the many moons seen on SOHO and the Stereo images, with a drifting tail of dust, were to be explained away. By inferring that the Chile quake altered the rotation time span of the Earth, they are trying to put into the public's mind the idea that quakes can affect rotation. Global Warming of course was to be the excuse for rising seas caused by heat rising from the core of the Earth, though this has now been taken from them. Any additional excuses they muster forth will not be believed, as what is about to unfold will take them by surprise!

But this has not stopped NASA from continuing their campaign. Trust us, they say, the Sun is going to do horrible things! They are still warning of a worst ever solar maximum, despite the fact that that Sun is simply not cooperating.

ZetaTalk: Written on July 15 1996
The effect [of Solar Flares] on Earth is in the realm of energy disruption, a surge of the various energy arenas that humans are aware of and others they are unaware of. Solar flares affect the activity of fish and kelp in the sea, in that water bends and deflects some energy rays and thus concentrates them. Just as humans find themselves more restless during a full moon, life in the sea is a bit more restless during solar flares - energized. Solar flares do not affect the core of the Earth, nor are they causing increased earthquake activity. This explanation by the establishment for increased activity in the Earth's core is to avoid mentioning the approach of the 12th Planet, and is easily rebutted. Have sunspots resulted in earthquakes in the past?

G1.9 Cover

Spanish astronomers have supposedly located a brown dwarf near our solar system, on a loop bringing this brown dwarf fairly close to the Sun!

G1.9 Confirmed Binary Dwarf Star Very Near Sun
June 15, 2010
Scientists at places like NASA and famous observatories have deflected inquiries about the discovery for a few years now, mainly because they feared being associated with these "fringe" theories. But like it or not -- it has happened. According to a team of Spanish artronomers who call themselves the StarViewer Team. The group made the rounds of all the news web sites in the past two weeks, claiming they discovered something very significant. It's almost twice the size of Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it's not a planet, it appears to have planets or large satellites encircling it. It's what astronomers call a "brown dwarf star" and its official name is "G1.9". The newly discovered brown dwarf is reported to be located just about 60 to 66 AU (1 AU=the distance from the Sun to Earth) from us (its parigee), currently in the direction of the constellation Sagittarius.

Ah, the perfect excuse! Now when the magnetic field is blasted, and there is no activity on the Sun to cover, NASA can claim that G1.9 caused this! The photo even looks a bit like the inbound Planet X did in 2003! Per the Zetas, this is all part of the plan, as this is a hoax attempting to duplicate the approach of Planet X in 2003.

ZetaTalk Comment 8/7/2010: NASA is frantic to take the lead, having stonewalled the subject up until now. When Planet X was inbound from 1997 to 2003, we, the Zetas provided coordinates by which a dim star with bright fuzz around it could be seen tracking to our coordinates. Then in early 2003 when it passed from the night sky to be lost in the glare of the Sun, there were dramatic photos showing an approaching planet surrounded by a swirling double helix dust cloud on either side. After that, we entered the era of the Second Sun, when Planet X was close to the Sun in the line of view, but showing up on SOHO and certainly making an impact on the Earth's magnetosphere. Now that their desperate attempts to blame the Sun or Global Warming for the Earth changes and Earth wobble, they are hoping to grasp the reins of leadership and announce they have found the source of all these perturbations! Yes, it is G1.9, which astronomers have suddenly located! Is this the Sun's binary? No, the Sun's binary is 18.74 Sun-Pluto distances away in the direction of the constellation Orion, and is static, not moving. Is this even a brown dwarf? To fit in mankind's description, a brown dwarf must be gaseous and huge, so that it could be, theoretically, an unlit star. Certainly the photos they are providing do not fit this description, as there is a light source from somewhere illuminating the red wings on either side, and if from this so-called brown dwarf, why is the dwarf itself unlit? Is this, perhaps, a complete fraud, as amateur cannot find this body. Astronomers tasked with inventing something to compete with our early photos of Planet X have indeed invented a complete fraud. NASA is pretending to argue and ignore these astronomers, to give the illusion that they are not working
together. Liars, all of them.


Also learn about:


Magnetic Versus Geographic Poles

And whether poles reverse in polarity:

ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals


Do the Earth's poles ever suffer a reversal during a pole shift? No. Although Yahoo! would like to have us believe otherwise:

ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

Do the Earth's poles ever suffer a reversal during a pole shift? No. The Earth's polarity, where the magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction as though focused on a distant point in the Universe, does not change, ever. This is an illusion, a hypothesis that humans have concocted to explain what they find in the Earth's crust. In this hypothesis, they are assuming that the Earth's crust does not move about, but it does. What humans are measuring is the confusion in the crust, and not the direction of the magnetic North Pole. Between pole shifts, however, there are slight movements of the magnetic North Pole, especially during the time just before and after a pole shift - approximately a hundred years on either side. The giant comet speaks to the Earth from afar. Scientists who do not buy into the pole shift will argue endlessly that it is the poles that move and reverse, and any discussion with such scientists should begin by first clarifying the pole shift premise. Sometimes, during a pole shift, the movement is slight, and sometimes literal reversals take place, where the crust does, as you say, a 180. The coming shift will come close to that, being better than a quarter turn. Having only the Earth's crust to examine, and being in denial or unaware of pole shifts, a human could only assume that the poles had moved, rather than the crust. - All rights reserved:


The Zetas have long warned that in addition to blaming the Sun, the establishment would try to blame asteroid swarms for the increased debris in the skies from the tail of Planet X.

Here's the NASA info and the new ZT on this matter:
We present a dynamical investigation of a newly found asteroid, 2010 SO16, and the discovery that it is a horseshoe companion of the Earth. The object’s absolute magnitude (H = 20.7) makes this the largest object of its type known to-date. By carrying out numerical integrations of dynamical clones, we find that (a) its status as a horseshoe is secure given the current accuracy of its ephemeris, and (b) the time spent in horseshoe libration with the Earth is several times 105 yr, two orders of magnitude longer than determined for other horseshoe asteroids of the Earth. Further, using a model based on Hill’s approximation to the three-body problem, we show that, apart from the low eccentricity which prevents close encounters with other planets or the Earth itself, its stability can be attributed to the value of its Jacobi constant far from the regime that allows transitions into other coorbital modes or escape from the resonance altogether. We provide evidence that the eventual escape of the asteroid from horseshoe libration is caused by the action of planetary secular perturbations and the stochastic evolution of the eccentricity. The questions of its origin and the existence of as-yet-undiscovered co-orbital companions of the Earth are discussed.

And the ZetaTalk on the matter:


There is no such asteroid orbit, as might be suspected since asteroid orbits have been studied for decades by the thousands and this is being first announced. Why? Because the debris in the tail of Planet X is increasing, and they need MORE excuses. We predicted that asteroid swarms would be one such excuse, and this is a variant.


You should be vigilant and read between the lines, let your instincts guide you through the Establishment's barrage of lies and disinformation.

Stay tuned to ZetaTalk chats on this Ning, and don't delay preparing.



© 2024   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service