This time the solar eclipse will be visible from the Northern Hemisphere, across Asia and much of N America. This site gives the time and place where the eclipse will be visible.
Go to this wiki site for an animation of the eclipse, so you can get a sense of where and when it will be possible to have the Sun's glare reduced.
Solar Eclipse of May 20, 2012
An annular solar eclipse will take place on May 20, 2012 (May 21, 2012 for local time in Eastern Hemisphere), with a magnitude of 0.9439. A solar eclipse occurs when the Moon passes between Earth and the Sun, thereby totally or partially obscuring the image of the Sun for a viewer on Earth. An annular solar eclipse occurs when the Moon's apparent diameter is smaller than the Sun, causing the Sun to look like an annulus (ring), blocking most of the Sun's light. An annular eclipse appears as a partial eclipse over a region thousands of kilometres wide.
Where the eclipse will not be total (it is being called an annular eclipse), the glare of the Sun will be greatly reduced. At the present time, just in the past few days, we have had luck capturing Planet X in photos and videos, even seeing it naked eye at it's N America position! Here's a collage from the ning.
Will Planet X show up this time, in front of the cameras? It did last time, for the July 11, 2010 eclipse though not in front of webcams being broadcast over the Internet. The webcam transmissions from the South Pacific and S America all went down, simultaneously, worldwide, at the point where Planet X would become visible. Planet X would appear at the 10-11 o'clock position in the Southern Hemisphere, and just as the Moon was moving past to the position where this part of the Sun would be seen, boom, the webcams were shut down! Here's what was starting to peek out from behind the Moon, just ahead of the Sun making an appearance! Planet X! ZetaTalk on the 7/11/2010 Eclipse: http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/17jy2010.htm
Planet X was at a perfect angle for a dramatic appearance during the July 11, 2010 eclipse. The establishment, desperate to maintain the cover-up during such a well watched event, was frantic, as live feed from several sources had been promised. As anyone watching the event from several webcams noted, the lead-up to the event was played for almost an hour prior to the full eclipse. This was not a worry because the establishment knew that Planet X would only make its appearance as the eclipse was waning, pulling away from the spot where Planet X could shine without competition from the glare of the Sun. The order went out to cut all cams as soon as the total eclipse was ended, and remarkably, worldwide, on all cams, this occurred. Is the world wired to a single switch? Was there no interest in the eclipse after the moment of totality? The public is to assume a faulty feed, as the public is assumed to be watching on only one feed at a time, but to ensure the best screen shots many in the public watched on several cams at once. Those who watched from their own yards, and took snaps of the eclipse as it waned, also knew the truth. There are enough of these dramatic photos circulating on the Internet to start viral rumors about the planetary presence next to the Sun. proof, during the eclipse, is the fact that all cams were shut down promptly when this presence was about to be displayed for the world to see. Why else shut down the cams, worldwide?
Be aware that many establishment sites post photos that have been selected so evidence does not come through. In 2006, spaceweather.com was caught doctoring photos,
supposedly submitted by the public. For instance, during the January 26, 2009 eclipse, an extremely dark filter used by the establishment HID Planet X at the 2 o'clock position, where it was expected. Spaceweather.com
only published photos that hid Planet X in this manner.
Nothing rings out the truth like an aware public snapping their OWN photos, and posting them here on the ning! Will the Council of Worlds maintain the Element of Doubt this time, forcing normalcy so panic is not extreme, or will they allow the truth to emerge?
ZetaTalk on the 6/20/2009 Eclipse: http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta517.htm
The pattern has been that all events such as an eclipse have been assisted so that those who would go insane if presented by the truth will not be pressed to this extent. At some point, of course, this will change, and the truth will be allowed to begin to emerge beyond the extent it is today with the wobble and occasional glimpse of Planet X on SOHO or videos. Just when that time comes, we will not say.
********************** Post Eclipse Analysis *********************
So what emerged? Even with an erratic Moon orbit, during the Full and New Moon the Moon’s orbit is found where expected. But the Earth wobble finds the globe pushed daily to the North when the Sun is over the Pacific, when the magnetic N Pole comes up over the horizon to confront the magnetic N Pole of Planet X. Thus the full lunar eclipse was not viewed in California as expected, in the late afternoon, but WAS viewed in Texas more than expected! The Earth wobble was verified for those watching, who did NOT get an explanation for these viewing aberations in N America. Comments on the GLP message board
from Sacramento and Los Angeles. The Moon was missing in Sacramento! This is what was expected for Sacramento 4:54pm according to Skysafari Plus.
So according to the local Sacramento newspaper and media, the Sacramento area should experience 92% maximum of the solar eclispe starting at 5:15pm, peaking at 6:32pm and ending at 7:39pm. Yet here it is 30 minutes before the show and the moon is nowhere to be seen in the California sky - what's going on here? 92% should have made it fairly dark, musky looking at the least outside. Kind of weird I haven't seen one in years, but the last time I did, everything looked smoky, very little light at its peak. Lasted about an hour.
Los Angeles should have been in the eclipse from 5:25 pm to 7:49 pm, yet in the middle of this period, when they should have been in a full eclipse, they had nothing! Yet amateur photos
from Odessa, Midland, and Big Springs, TX show a perfect full eclipse! Why would the eclipse MOVE from where expected unless the Earth wobble had interfered?
Los Angeles California here. No eclipse here at all. It is 5:25 pm. Nada. Nothing. No doom. No planet alignment. Fail. The peak is supposed to be at 6:38 here (Los Angeles). I'm not seeing anything yet either. Isn't it supposed to get a little darker at least? ESPN is in LA right now and haven’t shown it!
Then there was the matter of the very reddish glow at the 2 o’clock position. Per comments on the Pole Shift ning
from someone in Dallas, this was clearly visible, along with a glow on the lower left hand side. Per a GLP message board,
photos captured in Lubbock, TX. And amidst a slideshow of photos from China
a distinct reddish glow at the 2 o’clock position.
What a sight to await! 2 alarms blared at 7:30 pm. We scrambled to the flat roof and dared go barefoot on the metal roof to reach the peak. Alas the clouds interfered about 7:46pm Dallas TX. Ready with our red filters atop the highest peak of my roof, friends and I awaited the sunset. At about 2 o'clock position the sun clouds glared brighter in that area in addition to the lower sun to the left.
Here's a few I caught in Lubbock, TX just before sunset. Unfortunately, one cloud moved in right before the eclipse started and then never moved. We did get to catch part of the eclipse as the sun moved between holes in the cloud.
A glow on the lower left hand side was likewise evident. This showed up in photos from Yokohama, Japan
and in a YouTube video
taken in Japan. Was this glow at the 8-9 o’clock position from any solar flares or sunspots at the time? If so, then the glow on the edge of the Sun at the 10 o’clock position is curiously missing.
And finally, the lunar eclipse of May 20-21, 2012 showed NUMEROUS moons of Planet X against the face of the Sun, without question. Due to the wafting tail of Planet X, these moved about, but showed up in photos from Utah,
These are not sunspots, which would in any case not show up as DARK spots on the face of the Sun. These are Moons of Planet X! As obvious and nearly as large as any anticipated or past transit of Venus! Thus overall, the lunar eclipse of May 20-21, 2012 provided proof of the Earth wobble, evidence of glow of sunlight bouncing off the vast red dust cloud of Planet X, and a dramatic appearance of the Moons of Planet X against the face of the Sun.
ZetaTalk Q&A May 26, 2012: http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/26ma2012.htm
Could the Zetas do the resolution on a Solar Eclipse of May 20-21, 2012? How CoW played on it?
The May 20-21, 2012 lunar eclipse was obviously assisted to some degree, or it would not have been fully visible in Asia, which it was. The wobble was drastically reduced for the occasion, but even at this level of reduction, it affected visibility on the N American continent. When the Sun is high over the Pacific, the globe is being pushed northward so the magnetic N Pole of the Earth can evade the magnetic N Pole of Planet X. Thus the full view of the lunar eclipse on the West Coast of N America was south of what was expected. Texas was not expected to get a full eclipse view, but did. And where California expected to get the full eclipse view, it did not. This was noted in comments and recorded in photos. This documentation of the Earth wobble has been wholly unexplained by the media or scientific bodies, nor has it even been addressed.
As recent photos and videos taken with red filters have shown, the vast tail of Planet X is wafting in a counterclockwise manner between the Sun and the Earth, placing the Moon Swirls most often to the left of the Sun, as viewed from the Northern Hemisphere, but on occasion wrapping around to be on the upper right of the Sun. Thus one of the swirls, pointing toward the Earth and funneling sunlight down its tube, created a reddish lit orb at the 2 o’clock position, quite visible on photos from Asia to America. There was likewise a glow from sunlight reflected off the dust cloud on the lower left hand side. Neither of these light sources can be claimed from the Sun, which was quiescent at the time and did not have flares or sunspots that lined up with the glows.
A third phenomena that occurred was similar to a transit of Venus, such was the visibility of some of the massive moons of Planet X outlined against the Sun. These moons moved about, as the swirling of the tail has them in motion, so they appeared in various places, but there was consistency in the locations to the degree that it could not be claimed they were dust on the lens. With the glare from the Sun greatly reduced by the filters being used during photography, scattered or reflected light cannot be blamed. These were solid objects, large enough to rival a transiting Venus on the Sun, though the moons of Planet X are far closer to the Earth than Venus and thus not as large as Venus. This phenomena too is being ignored by the media or scientific bodies, but was certainly noted by the public.