For those who are not aware, Nancy has indicated that she is not going to be available anymore to answer all of your questions that you email her as her health and resources are being stretched and has deleted all of those in her friends list except those on her mirror sites team.
Additionally, the Zetatalk Chat sessions are ONLY for people asking the Zetas a question and all non-question related posts will be deleted by the mods.
This is also being done as in the near future, due to the anticipated increase in interest in the Ning when the 7/10 events really kick in, even MORE policing of the site will be required of the mods and when that happens, any content to be deleted or members to be suspended will occur without warning or explanation.
So, where you would have messaged Nancy before or posted on the ZetaTalk chat and now can't as it's not a direct question for the Zetas, post your questions here! All questions welcome.
Since the start of this Ning, you have a wealth of individuals who know the ZetaTalk message almost as well as Nancy does - there's no need to ask her, just ask here. Nancy is one person, but the Ning is a big group who can answer your questions (and want to answer your questions) in the same way!
(and please don't PM me with your questions - post them here instead)
ADDENDUM by Nancy. This was a Zeta response on December 4, 2010 during the chats, and I think it applies. I have warned the chats that the time would come when I would only say 'accepted' for those accepted, and not respond at all to other questions. That time has come, as of this week. Here's the prior ZetaTalk:
This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek.
To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.
Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p126.htm
Size and shape is affected by what exactly the light is reflecting off:
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/12ju2010.htm
To completely understand the confusion associated with the Moon Swirls, and the body of Planet X. How distinguish Moon Swirls and itself Planet X on the images SOHO/STEREO? So, all that we saw earlier in the pictures SOHO/STEREO is only a swirl of moons? Are there any general satellite image of the planet X?
SOZT
The Winged Globe and Red Cross are the body of Planet X, identified primarily by position in the lower right hand side of the Sun on SOHO and Stereo images. Where there is a String of Pearls this is clearly a Moon Swirl seen from the side. The primary reason for confusion is that most of the visibility is due to the dust cloud, which reflects sunlight. This is true whether the dust is shrouding the corpus, Planet X itself, or a Moon Swirl. Both have drifting debris, the drifting tail so often noted. Both have a blaze of light. Planet X itself has two primary Moon Swirls that flare out on either side, like shoulder pads. This is the source of the Winged Globe shape, and the double helix shape on some photos of Planet X. These Moon Swirls keep apart from each other, though compete to be the closest Moon Swirl to the body of Planet X itself. Fairly equal in mass, they both cling close to the body of Planet X and both refuse to be displaced, thus the wings. The Checkmark shape is due to a similar arrangement coming from a single moon. When seen, this is clearly not the body of Planet X, but a Moon Swirl arrangement.
EOZT
also, planet x will switch sides in images depending in which hemisphere the photo was taken
Stanislav said:
Hello,
Why Planet X was not visible from 2003 to 2010 in Russia or there in Europe. How is it that on some pictures it right the other left?
Why do the images of different size it is?
I have a question about Zeta Talk 2010 - http://http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx058.htm
"The devastation to Texas has, until this moment, come in bits and pieces of ZetaTalk. We early made the statement that the water will roll across Texas even to "lap at the foothills of the Rockies". Our statement was also that Dallas would be flooded for weeks, and the UFO warnings about Stephenville getting the drowning from Dallas crawling up on their shore reiterated that".Our statements on the degree to which Texas will be flooded have been ridiculed, but have consistency. Maps of the area showing where a water height of 875 feet show our predictions as possible at this height. would we not merely warn Texans that the tidal wave along their shores was going to be 875 feet? In our experience, it is better to move to the next level, explaining what this means to man, who else does not engage the reality of the message. To state what cities will be flooded and how far the water will push gets their attention, where a mere number does not.
My questions is actually about the maps - the Hill Country in particular where the elevation is over 1200 ft. Why is it showing underwater? Wouldn't the Hill Country escape the flooding?
Hi Ona McGeorge
Which map are you talking about?
There are 3 maps on this page one showing where the Balcones Fault is, this one is not showing flooding. The other two are showing different parts of Texas with an 875 foot sea level rise.
Using the link below zoom into Texas and enter 875 feet in red and you will get the same maps.
http://maps.google.com/maps/mapplets?moduleurl=http://www.heywhatst...
I have a question about Zeta Talk 2010 - http://http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx058.htm
"The devastation to Texas has, until this moment, come in bits and pieces of ZetaTalk. We early made the statement that the water will roll across Texas even to "lap at the foothills of the Rockies". Our statement was also that Dallas would be flooded for weeks, and the UFO warnings about Stephenville getting the drowning from Dallas crawling up on their shore reiterated that".Our statements on the degree to which Texas will be flooded have been ridiculed, but have consistency. Maps of the area showing where a water height of 875 feet show our predictions as possible at this height. would we not merely warn Texans that the tidal wave along their shores was going to be 875 feet? In our experience, it is better to move to the next level, explaining what this means to man, who else does not engage the reality of the message. To state what cities will be flooded and how far the water will push gets their attention, where a mere number does not.
My questions is actually about the maps - the Hill Country in particular where the elevation is over 1200 ft. Why is it showing underwater? Wouldn't the Hill Country escape the flooding?
Hi Ona McGeorge
The red is the flooded part. You can make you own maps of anywhere using the Google Maps link in step 3 of this blog.
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/determine-your-safe-locations
Thank you for responding so quickly. I guess my question is about the maps in general - is it the white parts that are underwater or the pink? Because the white parts show 875 feet and the pink parts don't.
Hi all !
Can anyone find a link for me to an early blogpost on basement fortification ?? I´ve tried and tried but don´t find what I´m looking for.. I remember an early blog on the subject, that is : how to secure your basement, and there were photos to illustrate how to secure the beams in the ceiling and such..
Many thanks in advance !!!
xxx malou
Hi Malou - This may be what you're seeking:
http://www.oism.org/nwss/s73p939.htm
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=3863141%3ABlogPost%...
Thanks Howard you really know where to find the info, the one about the wind was new to me and very helpful.
I don't think its what Malou is looking for as I remember the basement info from ages ago.
Thank again Howard.
Hi Howard and thanks, but no - Deborah´s right - I was hoping to find an old blogpost on specifically how to fortify your existing basement - I remember Nancy had a few comments on it as well, actually, but it just escapes me who put it up originally, and yes, it is "from ages ago" :-)
I DO, however, appreciate your links !!
-- xx malou
Hi Malou - This may be what you're seeking:
http://www.oism.org/nwss/s73p939.htm
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=3863141%3ABlogPost%...
is this it?
http://www.zetatalk.com/shelter/tshlt09m.htm
Hi all !
Can anyone find a link for me to an early blogpost on basement fortification ?? I´ve tried and tried but don´t find what I´m looking for.. I remember an early blog on the subject, that is : how to secure your basement, and there were photos to illustrate how to secure the beams in the ceiling and such..
Many thanks in advance !!!
xxx malou
Thankee, Mark !
Yup, that was it... would have loved to re-read all the comments !
-- malou
Mark said:
is this it?
http://www.zetatalk.com/shelter/tshlt09m.htm
Malou (Marie Louise) Geleff said:
Hi all !
Can anyone find a link for me to an early blogpost on basement fortification ?? I´ve tried and tried but don´t find what I´m looking for.. I remember an early blog on the subject, that is : how to secure your basement, and there were photos to illustrate how to secure the beams in the ceiling and such..
Many thanks in advance !!!
xxx malou
Although I think you'd get better advice by just getting a local builder to come round and advise you.
Zetatalk is not somewhere I would go for cellar strengthening advice - structural engineering is a known science, surely? Plenty of information out there.
Related info : Pre and Post Disaster Shelter:
1- The first thing to do is to select a section of your basement or house that has no windows or openings. After selecting the location clear it out of any objects and start to build your shelter. There are many ways to build a shelter, the best way is to use a corner of the basement that doesnt have any windows. In this corner of the basement make your shelter a minumim of 15x15, build the shelter out of any strong matterial the best being concrete block. Close of the corner of the basement by building a corner shaped wall making this into a room. You will need to make a door that is strong enough to keep people or animals out. Make this door out of steel. Another thing that you will need is a vent for fresh air and a vent for exhaust. Make sure that this shelter also has its own roof above it not just the floor studs and beams.
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
© 2024 Created by 0nin2migqvl32. Powered by