Is lockdown useless? There was no lockdown in Sweden and Japan and the situation there is even better in many other countries. At the same time, the successful example of China is questionable due to data falsification. Human science is failing after failure. [and from another] The Zetas have indicated that lockdowns can be highly effective in the short term under the right circumstances and were in China, to name one place. The how, when and how long of such lockdowns are important. However, extended lockdowns become not only debatable, but more detrimental than beneficial. The Zetas have said a lot about how the whole C-19 pandemic has become highly politicized, while we, the common people, are un/misinformed and manipulated by officials and the media. Read through all the Zeta comments on the pandemic, going back 8 months or so. [and from another] How Japan Beat Coronavirus Without Lockdowns July 7, 2020 https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-japan-beat-coronavirus-without-loc... A focus on contact tracing and ‘cluster busting’ has allowed us to avoid harmful economic restrictions. [and from another] No Lockdowns, but Sweden Seems to have Controlled the Covid-19 Pandemic October 1, 2020 https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/panorama/no-lockdowns-but-swed... The Swedes admit to making some mistakes, particularly in nursing homes, where the death toll was staggering. Indeed, comparative analyses show that Sweden’s death rate at the height of the pandemic in the spring far surpassed the rates in neighboring countries and was more protracted. The question is whether the country’s current low caseload, compared with sharp increases elsewhere, shows that it has found a sustainable balance, something that all Western countries are seeking eight months into the pandemic. [and from another] Crematorium data indicates China was lying about Covid-19 https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/coronavirus-crematorium-data-indic... [and from another] Lockdown Reversal Shows that when Science Conflicts with Politics, WHO Chooses Politics October 12, 2020 https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/12/lockdown-reversal-shows-that-w... After pushing lockdowns around the world for months, the World Health Organization has reversed course. WHO’s special envoy on COVID-19 said “We really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method.” Our guess is that growing public opposition to the lockdowns, and news of a return to normal in places like Sweden, made WHO’s support for the measures untenable. There’s never been good evidence that lockdowns work. Yet only now has WHO decided to admit this. [and from another] Dr. Marc Siegel: “I’m so Happy to See WHO Warning against Coronavirus Lockdowns October 12, 2020 https://www.foxnews.com/health/dr-siegel-who-coronavirus-lockdowns-... Dr. David Nabarro, the WHO director general’s special envoy, said last week that the global body "do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it".
Lockdowns were effective early in the Covid-19 pandemic because there were not enough ventilators in hospitals for those that needed them. In the early months, proven antivirals were not available, and any vaccine months away. Now all that has changed. The key in a viral infection such as the flu, of which Covid-19 is a variant, is herd immunity. This is why the annual flu disappears after a few months. Herd immunity has been delayed in most countries because of lockdowns.
Sweden is the model showing what would happen if the world had not used lockdowns. Antivirals and ample ventilators were not available to Sweden, nor had they deployed a vaccine. They compare favorably to the other European countries, showing that lockdowns are only delaying herd immunity, not changing the spread or lifespan of Covid-19. Limited lockdowns or quarantines to slow the infection rate so that hospitals are not overwhelmed have been effective in this regard, but also only slowed the arrival of herd immunity.
Now with numerous effective antivirals available and many vaccines already deployed, and with an abundant inventory of ventilators, why have lockdowns? As we explained last month, those countries that are going into draconian lockdowns at this time are not doing so to limit Covid-19 infections, they are doing so to impose Martial Law because they were warned that the Nibiru cover-up would soon fail. The elite in Europe never prepared for this, caring only for their own safety while they lied about Nibiru.
In the US, lockdowns are occurring in Democrat states trying to make President Trump look bad. The Democrats and Satanists who have infected them with their Moloch practices control the media and the pollsters. That Biden is winning is one big lie, a whopper. WHO is finally admitting the truth about lockdowns, reversing their stance, because they learned that President Trump will win by a landslide, and because the lack of US dollars, the 500 million withdrawn from WHO by President Trump, is hurting their operation. Why else would they reverse their stance?