EARTHQUAKES Worldwide! (Frequently Updated)

As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?

SOZT: Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many? EOZT

ZetaTalk Jun 18, 2011

Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?

SOZT: It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.

We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable. EOZT

Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.

[Edited by the Moderation]

< Previous Post

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Jenny Macnab on February 17, 2013 at 10:38pm: http://www.geonet.org.nz/quakes/felt

link for earthquakes in New Zealand since wednesday afternoon 13th Feb, 2013.

They number 17 in magnitude 2 range, 10 in mag 3 range, 2 in the mag 4 range, and one 6 mag range.

Comment by KM on February 17, 2013 at 9:58pm

http://anf.ucsd.edu/recenteqs/

Latitude	58.1495
Longitude	-82.2413
Magnitude	5.0 mb
Depth	15 km

UTC Time	19:30:00 UTC Sunday February 17th, 2013

Location	Hudson Bay, Eastern North America
Author	teleMb
Review status	-

Comment by KM on February 17, 2013 at 2:25am

http://anf.ucsd.edu/recenteqs/

There was a very strong smell in the area at the same time. A cross between what smelled like burning deisel fuel from a bad filter and sulfur.

Latitude	52.7666
Longitude	-108.3674
Magnitude	5.2 mb
Depth	15 km

UTC Time	22:25:13 UTC Saturday February 16th, 2013

Location	Saskatchewan, Canada, Eastern North America
Author	teleMb
Review status	-

Comment by Mario Valencia-Rojas on February 17, 2013 at 2:19am: Station 21415 (LLNR 984.85) - ATTU - 175 NM South of Attu, AK

-- Plot of 15-second data --

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=21415&type=2&...

Comment by Kojima on February 16, 2013 at 8:57am: Thank you, Carlos Ochoa.

M 6.6 in MARIANA ISLAND REGION was shown on EMSC, http://www.emsc-csem.org/#2w, for a while, then deleted.

Comment by Carlos on February 16, 2013 at 7:17am: 6.6 2013/02/16 16:05:23 (UTC) 18.75 N 143.17 E 10 Km MARIANA ISLAND REGION

http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=304978

Comment by Carlos on February 16, 2013 at 6:38am: 6.0 2013/02/16 05:16:18 (UTC) 36.130 S 178.045 E 204.5 Km (127.1 Miles) 219 KM ENE OF TAIRUA, NEW ZEALAND

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000f8cd#summary

Comment by Carlos on February 16, 2013 at 6:05am: 6.2 2013/02/16 04:37:36 (UTC) 5.759 N 125.838 E 98.2 Km (61.0 Miles) 28 KM SE OF CABURAN, PHILIPPINES

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000f8be#summary