So if these were nuked they cannot be considered part of the 7 or 10? Or doesn't it matter how the EQ happens? [and from another] http://benjaminfulford.net/ It is a given on Japanese internet chat boards that the recent spate of earthquakes in Southern Japan were all artificial earthquakes. The evidence presented is that the seismographs all resemble earthquakes caused by explosions with a sudden huge shock followed by steadily decreasing aftershocks. [and from another]https://truth11.com/2011/03/11/japan-tsunami-caused-by-haarp/ The next target will be the New Madrid fault line in the South-Western United States, according to threats originating from the Nazi George Bush Senior faction of the U.S. government. An undersea nuke was used to guarantee enough tsunami height to swamp the Fukushima diesel generators. It was all designed years ago by the Rockefeller family. The Rockefellers were trying to extort more money to keep the Federal Reserve going, but Japan said no more money.
Ben Fulford reported in the past that the 9.5 quake causing the Fukushima disaster was not natual, but man-made, the result of disputes between western bankers and the Japanese government. We, the Zetas, do not choose to become the Ben Fulford confirmation source, as the focus is financial and our attitude is that mankind should not deal with money at all, but share all resources fully in a solidly Service-to-Other manner. But our statement at the time on Fukushima confirmed that this quake was not related to the series of large quakes we predicted for Japan in the 7 of 10 sequence.
What about the hammering that occurred in the Kumamoto Prefecture of Japan on April 15? These were accompanied, almost immediately, by large quakes in Vanuatu on the eastern edge of the Indo-Australian Plate and Guatemala on the western edge of the Caribbean Plate, and followed within days by a massive quake in Ecuador where the Nazca Plate noses into the S American Plate. Clearly the plates around the Pacific Rim were involved, where Fukushima did not have a reaction elsewhere. Our prediction for the 7 of 10 quakes in Japan was for them to be accompanied by “sympathetic adjustments in the Pacific Ring of Fire”.
So is Fulford wrong? He is correct that the Kumamoto Prefecture quakes, at the start, were manmade, but the Council of Worlds quickly lifted the brake on the 7 of 10 plate movements to allow what had been held back to occur. Thus the April 15 quakes in Japan were both manmade and as a result of 7 of 10 plate movements. Releasing the 7 of 10 brake to this extent was done by the Council to remind the arrogant banking factions that there is more facing the Earth, their home as well as home to the common man, than their petty arguments over finances.