After repeated Council of Worlds slaps against Elon Musk’s Space X Falcon rocket launch and/or landings, during which the Zetas emphasized that a manned mission to Mars will not occur, they seem to have had a success. What is different about this launch and landing is that the ocean platform landing was not attempted. Instead, the stage one rocket was brought back to land in Florida. Was this the issue? Why the objection to the ocean platform landing? [and from another]  I understand the benefits of reusability for the rocket booster. But I don't understand why they're landing it on a barge. I've read tons of articles about this but not one has even hinted at an answer. Why is landing on a barge preferable over a launchpad or any other large flat surface that isn't moving with the waves? … Musk says the payload hit for RTLS (Return To Launch Site) is 30% vs a 15% payload hit for landing on a downrange ocean platform. … I see nobody seems to have mentioned the simplest reason why they're not landing on land: there isn't any. They launch east from Florida, and there aren't any islands in the Atlantic out there. [and from another]  The launch and landing in Cape Canaveral, Florida, were the first from the private U.S. spaceflight company since its rocket exploded on liftoff in June. SpaceX had not previously attempted to land a rocket on land, and it marked the firm's first successful attempt to recover a rocket from an orbital flight. Previous attempts, all unsuccessful, were attempted on floating landing pads. The 15-story first stage of rocket — used to propel the payload to 62 miles or so until the second stage takes over — successfully landed on Earth again at a prepared landing zone.

After repeated failures, which we described as warnings from the Council of Worlds, the Space X Falcon has successfully made a launch while relanding the booster rockets to Earth. What is the message here, amid this celebration? The trail of tears for Elon Musk included the Falcon exploding on launch last June 28, and the landing platform disaster on April 15. We explained that the Council was sending a message that the elite would not escape to Mars. Why then was the Falcon successfully launched with the booster rockets landed back in Cape Canaveral? Noticeably lacking this time was the landing on an ocean platform. 

Why is this key? Landing on an ocean platform did not make sense from a cost benefit analysis. Espoused for saving a mere 15% in fuel costs, it carried the overhead of the platform itself. Musk stated the reason for an ocean landing was to avoid a crash on land, near populated areas, during initial practice runs. But without a successful landing, this December 21 landing was done directly onto land. The real goal, an ocean platform landing AND launch, was dropped, so that simply launching satellites and resupplying the ISS would be involved for the present and in the future. 

Despite much crowing in the media about manned missions to Mars, all involved know this will never be accomplished. It is bravado and face saving. The missions to and from Mars would require operating during the Last Weeks and in the Aftertime, when Cape Canaveral in Florida will be awash and under water. Houston likewise will be quickly under water. The elite at NASA and hovering around Elon Musk are well aware of the ZetaTalk predictions and accuracy, and see how quickly Nibiru is approaching the Earth. They know that time is tight, the timeline compressing, and if a replacement for a land launch is not available, all is lost!

Source: ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for December 26, 2015

Views: 773


You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by M. Difato on December 6, 2018 at 9:37am

SpaceX lost a rocket booster during landing for the first time since 2016

  A SpaceX booster stage crashed into the ocean during an attempt to land at Cape Canaveral Wednesday (Dec. 5), after it launched a supply spacecraft to the International Space Station.

The brand-new Falcon 9 rocket booster lifted off successfully, but as the first stage—which contains nine Merlin engines and the bulk of the rocket’s structure—returned to land, it lost control and crashed into the Atlantic ocean.

The CRS-16 booster begins to spin out of control as it returns to Florida.

In a tweet, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk attributed the crash to a stalled hydraulic pump (which controls the fins on the rocket). He said the rocket appears to be undamaged and is still transmitting data to the control room.

Musk also said that the pump for the landing-control fins was not designed to have a redundant backup—it’s not critical to the mission of launching spacecraft— but said the company would likely add a backup now.

SpaceX stressed that their primary mission was launching NASA’s supplies into space, and so far that mission is on track, with the Dragon spacecraft scheduled to reach the ISS on Dec. 8. That will mean a new record for the company: its 20th successful launch in 2018.

Wednesday’s landing snafu involved a “block 5” Falcon 9 booster, which is designed to be re-used at least 10 times. On Dec. 3, SpaceX flew a different “block 5” rocket for the third time, landing it successfully for future re-use. As SpaceX rockets are priced starting at $60 million (though previously-flown ones retail more cheaply), the company’s inability to reuse this booster in the future could cost it millions.

The CRS-16 booster began spinning out of control toward the end of its landing pattern, just before it was expected to fire its engines to slow itself ahead of reaching the ground. It’s not known if any changes were made to this rocket compared to other block 5 boosters.

John Insprucker, the SpaceX engineer hosting the company’s live video stream, noted that the company will use the data gathered during the failed landing to iterate and improve on future vehicles.

This is the first failed landing of a Falcon 9 booster since June 2016. Since then, the company has recovered boosters 26 times in landings on autonomous drone ships and landing pads at Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg Air Force Base. While this is hardly the first time a SpaceX booster has crashed during a recovery attempt, more than two years of successful attempts made them seem routine.

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk


This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit


You can support the ning by using the above button. 


© 2018   Created by lonne rey.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service