GOT A QUESTION but don't know where to ask it? Post it here!

  For those who are not aware, Nancy has indicated that she is not going to be available anymore to answer all of your questions that you email her as her health and resources are being stretched and has deleted all of those in her friends list except those on her mirror sites team.
  Additionally, the Zetatalk Chat sessions are ONLY for people asking the Zetas a question and all non-question related posts will be deleted by the mods.

  This is also being done as in the near future, due to the anticipated increase in interest in the Ning when the 7/10 events really kick in, even MORE policing of the site will be required of the mods and when that happens, any content to be deleted or members to be suspended will occur without warning or explanation.

   So, where you would have messaged Nancy before or posted on the ZetaTalk chat and now can't as it's not a direct question for the Zetas, post your questions here!  All questions welcome.

  Since the start of this Ning, you have a wealth of individuals who know the ZetaTalk message almost as well as Nancy does - there's no need to ask her, just ask here. Nancy is one person, but the Ning is a big group who can answer your questions (and want to answer your questions) in the same way!

 (and please don't PM me with your questions - post them here instead)
 

ADDENDUM by Nancy. This was a Zeta response on December 4, 2010 during the chats, and I think it applies. I have warned the chats that the time would come when I would only say 'accepted' for those accepted, and not respond at all to other questions. That time has come, as of this week. Here's the prior ZetaTalk:

This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek.

To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.

Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.

Views: 63725

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Nancy's reference to 'toe jam' is basically her joking that the Wikipaedia article is focusing so much on stupid trivia about her that it's surprising they don't mention she has toe jam, which is just slang for getting fluff stuck between your toes. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=toe+jam)

There are many links I'm sure all over the place regarding the 'killing your pets' whole debacle (but I can't find a good one atm) The debunkers kept bringing it up for so long previously on sites like Godlikeproductions as it was so easy to twist what Nancy said to make her look like she was telling everyone to go out and kill their pets.

Basically what happened was, before the 2003 date (and the whole white lie thing obviously), Nancy was asked, during a radio interview I think, what people should do about their pets in regard to the pole shift, which at the time was believed to be just around the corner.  

Understandably, she advised that putting your pets down before the shift was the kindest thing for them, as in the aftertime, food would in such scarce supply that feeding your pets would not be a realistic expectation when you cannot feed yourself and either they would starve, which would not be a pleasant experience for them, or they would be killed for food themselves.

Add to that, when Nancy was asked about what she did with her dog, she told them that she had had it put down - what the debunkers failed to mention when calling Nancy a 'puppy killer' is that in her case, having her dog put down had little if anything to do with the pole shift at all; she had a large german shepherd dog (if memory serves me correctly) which was so under socialized as a pup that it was a danger to other people so it was only a matter of time until it attacked someone else, despite the fact that with Nancy herself the dog was a perfectly normal and loving pet.  I remember her telling the story of how it almost seemed on one occasion as if it was going to jump through a window to get at/attack someone so putting him/her down was the sensible thing to do.

Because of this, the 'dead dog' label followed Nancy for quite a while, and if the main poleshift discussion was not on this ning where such things are obviously not tolerated, I have no doubt that Nancy's detracters would still be calling her the 'puppy killer' today!

Hence why the mention of it on the Wikipaedia article shows how out of touch they are and how they are focusing on such trivial things - so why not say that Nancy has toe jam as that's just as irrelevant! :-)

hope this explains it. 

 

 

 

 

@Mark thanks very much~now i have a better understanding about this.(and urbandictionary is useful to me)

@ Dierk Wallrabenstein  i`m sorry,i didn`t ask the question properly,i want to know the reason why nancy say kill pet,but thanks all the same!

@Kris H  i love that sentence"Is life only worth living when it is easy?"

Read here (found by typing "nuclear power" into the search engine):

"Nuclear Power" in ZetaTalk

Erin Laskey said:

In choosing a safe location I've read that considering the proximity of nuclear power plants is very important, yet I don't seem to see it showing up in the assessments of what makes an area safe on this site. Why is that? Are they somehow not going to be an issue? Africa seemed like an ideal area for this reason, on top of the many other favorable characteristics.

@Kris H i love that sentence"Is life only worth living when it is easy?"

I agree, the Lakota believed something quite similar too- for the Lakota, in life there were 2 roads - the red road (the good one) and the black road (the bad one) but the thing was that the red road was the difficult road and the black road was the easy one! they knew a thing or two about spiritual lessons! :-)

http://www.a-w-i-p.com/index.php/spiritual-matters/2010/02/12/the-r...

@Mark: In thinking about that sentence now, I'm not sure if I can take credit for it. Seems like maybe the Zetas or Nancy said it before. If so, I have since internalized it as a response to that question as well. I don't intend to plagiarized, so apologize if I did. Thanks for the Lakota post.



Mark said:

@Kris H i love that sentence"Is life only worth living when it is easy?"

I agree, the Lakota believed something quite similar too- for the Lakota, in life there were 2 roads - the red road (the good one) and the black road (the bad one) but the thing was that the red road was the difficult road and the black road was the easy one! they knew a thing or two about spiritual lessons! :-)

http://www.a-w-i-p.com/index.php/spiritual-matters/2010/02/12/the-r...

in the article “mind/spirit connection”
spirit are composed of a substance that is physical in the larger scheme......
what does in the large scheme mean?

Hi Sunlit

This is the quote you are referring to and the one underlined below explains in further detail that the stuff of souls is another density level, one that touches on all the others and that it could be called the base of all matter. I believe this is the larger scheme  they are referring to, that the stuff of souls permeates all levels where matter can reside.

http://www.zetatalk.com/density/d20.htm

“This puzzle is most easily understood if one considers how sub-atomic particles operate. However diverse the various elements of the physical world seem, they break down into the same component parts. The base building blocks are the same. Spirits are composed of a substance that is physical in the larger scheme, and surpasses in its reach any one density vibration. Just as on the sub-atomic level you consider some elements to communicate electrically, encouraging or inciting an electron flow, and other elements to be inert, just so your spirit considers your mind to be capable of an interchange where the stone walls it passes through are inert. The spirit communicates to the mind by biochemical means, by inciting biochemical activity. It does so by adjusting itself to the density of the incarnated body and to the peculiar biochemistry of the life form. This feat is no more spectacular than tuning an x-ray machine to penetrate the thickness of an object. During each incarnation the spirit quickly familiarizes itself with its new physical body, and gets down to business.”

 

 

http://www.zetatalk.com/density/d30.htm

“The soul not only has memory, it does not forget. It is not by accident that intelligent life forms have nerves, brains, and memory in the form of chemical impressions. It is not by accident that this same structure is found for intelligent thought on all density levels. It is intrinsic to the way the Universe is structured, and thus souls likewise have such structures. The stuff of souls is simply another density level, one that touches on all the others. It is finer and more durable, at the same time. It could be called the base of matter, in that regard, as it permeates all levels where matter can reside. Intelligent life forms come in many shapes and sizes, but all have brains and nerves. Thus a soul can incarnate in a hominoid at one point in its development, and into quite another life form during another incarnation, without any adaptation required.”

 

 



sunlint said:

in the article “mind/spirit connection”
spirit are composed of a substance that is physical in the larger scheme......
what does in the large scheme mean?

thanks very much though i still didn`t quite understand the word 'scheme',maybe i can simply change' in the large scheme''into "almost everywhere"?or you can help me find another similar word?
now i understand what it means, but i want to get the exact meaning of each word.(i am trying to translate this artical into chinese).thanks angain
Derrick Johnson said:

Hi Sunlit

This is the quote you are referring to and the one underlined below explains in further detail that the stuff of souls is another density level, one that touches on all the others and that it could be called the base of all matter. I believe this is the larger scheme  they are referring to, that the stuff of souls permeates all levels where matter can reside.

I don't think anyone's going to be able to explain what the Zeta's mean to the point where you will be able to understand it enough to translate it into another language as what the mind/spirit ZT is talking about is just chock full of abstract concepts from the start that the whole text is probably going to be interpreted differently by different people! :-)

But I think Derrick is right IMO, where the ZT says 'the larger scheme' they are talking about 'across all densities'.

So where it says 'Spirits are composed of a substance that is physical in the larger scheme, and surpasses in its reach any one density vibration' I believe the term 'larger scheme' refers to all densities - as if an observer was looking down and observing all densities at once and that's what he would call it (the larger scheme).

Not sure that this will help you though or just make it more confusing - good on you for translating ZT into chinese for others to read but this particular ZT is of such an abstract nature that you might want to just leave it out as it will be so easy to lose the meaning of what's being said (as it's not 100% clear to us English speakers) :-)

sunlint said:

thanks very much though i still didn`t quite understand the word 'scheme',maybe i can simply change' in the large scheme''into "almost everywhere"?or you can help me find another similar word?
now i understand what it means, but i want to get the exact meaning of each word.(i am trying to translate this artical into chinese).thanks angain
Derrick Johnson said:

Hi Sunlit

This is the quote you are referring to and the one underlined below explains in further detail that the stuff of souls is another density level, one that touches on all the others and that it could be called the base of all matter. I believe this is the larger scheme  they are referring to, that the stuff of souls permeates all levels where matter can reside.

And here's a funny thing I read recently that illustrates my point regarding the difficulty of translating from English to Chinese:

"When ad men for Pepsi-Cola had their slogan 'Come alive with Pepsi' translated into Mandarin, the translation turned out to mean: 'Pepsi brings your ancestors back from the grave.'

 

lol - don't know how true it is but you can see what I mean! :-) 

 

 

@ sunlint,  a few phrases that are like, "the larger scheme" would maybe be "the bigger picture", or "the grand plan".  thats all i can realy think of.   Like stepping back and "looking at the bigger picture,"  a broader view.?  hope that helps.:)

thanks for all of you!!!  ["A larger framework" in Chinese deleted by mod staff.  Ning Rule No. 14.]

though i may twist ZT information more or less,i still want to work on it .better little than never.there is little people in china who read zetatalk,and most of them will say , ZT only talk about disasters,that is not good.i don`t know how to answer them because except the weekly newsletter, they hardly go to the website to have a broader look.so i want them to read more information from ZT so that they would change their opinion.

RSS

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2020   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service