This Picture was taken in Sicily (Trapani) the 25th of April ... to be honest I thought this being a lens reflection ... but I am not sure anymore, any comment would be appreciated

 

Peace and Love

Hi Antonie, yes, we must be extremely careful about these images with the lens pointing at the sun. BONUS: Lens reflections and flares.

Hi Michelle, the strange thing about your photo and Steve's is that although they were taken in Italy and Utah, USA, in two different places, the location of the orbs are very close to each other. They are difficult pictures to comment. I hope they are not reflections. Unless filter is used, it is hard to reach a conclusion about the images, because reflections are real in the images like the photo itself.

Lens Flare – Digital Photography Tip of the Week

 

picture taken today at 1pm NZ time in Auckland

 

 

  

this picture is taken at the same time but with a different cellphone

 

another picture taken using another mobile phone on the 5th of May 2011 around 3pm

 

WHAT IS THIS?

 

Hi JP, thanks for the photo. Although your pic has a reflection and some lens flares, the body on the right is not a reflection or flare. Is it an optical reflection on the water molecules in the clouds or is it an individual light source is difficult to decide by just looking at this photo. Peace. Selim

I took this picture in May 18 2008, 19:37, in Urgup, Nevsehir, Turkey with my cellphone whose lens has a diameter of 2 0r 3 mm. Although the sun was about to set, the sunlight was strong  enough to create a lens flare. There is no lens reflection.

Thanks for the responses everybody. I was not aware of the " Sun Dog " .. That explains a lot. I see that when you see a sun dog it is known to represent rain may be on the way. Unfortunately Central Texas is in one of the worst droughts I have ever seen and have yet have a rain that will fill the lakes. Hopefully that will change.

 

Check out these two comparisons same street about same time in the morning, Street direction shows exactly SW on Google maps. I am assuming this has something to do with the solstice.

 

 

12/7/2010    07:47.05   Sun Dog on right of stoplight.

 

5/7/2011    07:51.19  Another picture taken with the series that I have recently put on this blog.

Hi JP, I didn't know about sun dogs either, so my previous comment needs modification: The body on the right is not a reflection or flare. That's true, but it is only a sun dog; it wasn't created by an individual light source other than the sun.

 

A sun dog or sundog (scientific name parhelion, plural parhelia, from Greek parēlion, (παρήλιον), παρά(beside) + ήλιος(sun), "beside the sun"; also called a mock sun^{[citation needed]} or a phantom sun^{[citation needed]}) is an atmospheric phenomenon that creates bright spots of light in the sky, often on a luminous ring or halo on either side of the sun.^[1]

Sundogs may appear as a colored patch of light to the left or right of the sun, 22° distant and at the same distance above the horizon as the sun, and in ice halos. They can be seen anywhere in the world during any season, but they are not always obvious or bright. Sundogs are best seen and are most conspicuous when the sun is low.

Formation and characteristics

Sundogs are made commonly of plate-shaped hexagonal ice crystals in high and cold cirrus clouds or, during very cold weather, by ice crystals called diamond dust drifting in the air at low levels. These crystals act as prisms, bending the light rays passing through them with a minimum deflection of 22°. If the crystals are randomly oriented, a complete ring around the sun is seen — a halo. But often, as the crystals sink through the air they become vertically aligned, so sunlight is refracted horizontally — in this case, sundogs are seen.

As the sun rises higher, the rays passing through the crystals are increasingly skewed from the horizontal plane. Their angle of deviation increases and the sundogs move further from the sun.^[2] However, they always stay at the same elevation as the sun.

Sundogs are red-colored at the side nearest the sun. Farther out the colors grade through oranges to blue. However, the colors overlap considerably and so are muted, never pure or saturated. The colors of the sundog finally merge into the white of the parhelic circle (if the latter is visible).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_dog

 

This is another typical sundog.

 

It is not a plane for sure, or a planet, either, because planets are seen as bright dots, unlike this long bright object. Moon swirls don't appear following a periodical pattern. But the object is there, real.

I just came across this picture online, a painting by William Blake.  I'm not sure if this has been discussed before or not, but it immediately struck me as Nibiru, with the two tails, as seen in the "string of pearls" captures on SOHO.

 

Hi ACG, it is a reflection in the system of the camera.

i took the Sun pic. Nowadays it looks bigger than earlier days. after took few pics i saw there is a round thing above the Sun. so i zoomed and taken another pic. here are those pics. it isn't reflection. i wont accept such a comment.

 

 

 

A friend of of friend of mine took this, she has more similar but this is one of the more clear images. Not sure what to make of it all.

The pictures Lee posted recently look legit.  Cannot find them, but there were similar pictures in the past with a confirmed second sun reflecting in a similar way to these:

Comment by lee craciun 

Made 2 screen shots. One from http://camvid.idokep.hu/topart22/topart22-2011-06-06.avi

 

 

And from http://camvid.idokep.hu/topart22/topart22-2011-06-01.avi

 

And one from May 20 of this year

http://camvid.idokep.hu/topart22/topart22-2011-05-20.avi

 

The Elusive Dark Twin behind the Moon:
-Lower left side:

Time: 10:45 CT June 11 2011
Iso 400
Exposure 2 seconds @ 22.5 mm aperture

I spend some time on the Hungary video, which shows reflection in the water. Ordinarily a reflection on the water is proof of a valid capture BUT there are several reflections of the Sun in the vid, falling down and to the right of the Sun. The way the Sun's reflection on the water happens, as a fat reflection, shows that the Sun is also reflected on the water just straight down, as presented earlier in this discussion.

Here the reflection on the water from "PX" is set out from the land aways, where the reflection from the Sun starts at the distant shore. This would be the case if this was all a camera ghost set slightly to the right and down a bit.

This is confirmed by snaps from other days (presented by others) which show the Sun's reflection on the water to be FAT at a midpoint. A reflection is normally an even strip. I think there are TWO ghosts, one offset to the right and down, and another simply DOWN, because of this fat ghost.

Tempting as this Hungary video was, I must conclude these are ghosts in the camera! Darn.

This photo was taken back in 2010

I decided to post it because I thought it would be useful especially since this photo was taken in Russia

PX?

Hi Stanislav.

I studied the photos and did some experiments on them (it took quite a lot time because measuring the sides and the angles on the screen needed a lot attention). My aim was to check if the second object on the right was a real object or a second reflection in the photo. The one on the left is obviously a reflection because it disappears in the second photo. I cropped and enlarged the photos and measured the sides of the right triangles to check if my measurements and calculations were correct, considering the Pythagorean theorem. There is 1 degree change in the angles which could have been the result of my not being able to be precise enough. So, it can be said that the second object on the right is real. But, only 2 photos are not enough to reach a certain conclusion.

Selim

@Bea T this is a sundog. You can see the halo around the Sun, and the extra color/rainbow along the halo, classic signs. Sundogs are from ice crystals in the atmosphere, can be seen naked eye too.

Hi Beverly, it is a typical reflection one gets when the lens is aimed at the sun. I have taken pictures of the sun with my cellphone and got many of those reflections which made me think that I caught an object in the sky.

Regards

Selim

Another earlier example for the reflections.

I have been careful to look at my screen and move it around until any lens flare overlaps the sun....every once in a while there is still an anomaly there.

here is another I took the other day, the lens flare has a red glow around it, it is bright and moves with the lens, I tried to make it overlap the sun, but you can still see the red hue around it, but then there is still this other anomaly  at 4:00 but it looks like a lens flare to me, it is so bright, but it wasn't there before....

Not at all, Kari, thank you. I have decided to reorganize my comments and lowered the size of some of the pictures to make them fit into one comment box.

 

Thanks Khan for the videos. I watched them several times and captured some screenshots and studied them. I noticed the following points:

1. This is a Naked Eye Observation (NEO) because reflections are caused by strong light sources (here, the sun) in the camera's processing system and one cannot try to find a reflection in the sky and zoom at
it, but he intentionally zooms at an object in the sky.

2. His hand is not stable and moves all around which would make a reflection change its position, color and density immensely, but the object remains the same apart from getting larger as a result of zooming and remains in the same position.

3. In the second video, the object is seen behind a cloud whereas reflections are on top of everything and cannot be behind anything in a photo.

And, I studied the screen shots below:

There is no reflection. Despite being behind clouds, the sun is always strong enough to create reflections.

The object is visible due to the zooming.

The object is as clear as it can be. There are no pinkish or reddish flares around it.

Sorry, the same thing happened again and the comments and the pics didn't fit into one box (I don't know about the Mb limit for one comment box).

The object is seen behind a cloud and reflections cannot behave like that.

My conclusion is that this is a real object. But, I don't think it is Nibiru because it hasn't got the moons or the debris around or behind it. It can be the Dark Twin.

The recording was made on the Northern hemisphere, I think. At the time of  recording, the angle was as follows:

The angle is bound to change because the object must be moving continuously, like other heavenly bodies in the sky.

in my truck windshield ..

object in 11 o'clock position is the X, reverse, if it were a positive image, sitting at 5 o'clock-

the other blobs at noonish are dead bug blobs.

 

yes/no?

In my opinion this is a "blooming" effect, caused by Planet X gravity. This is when light rays are drawn toward a gravity source, bent, and thus can group and add together appearing brighter than they would normally. This is a type of PROOF of the presence of Planet X, as what other gravity source would pull the light rays to THAT place!

Hi Paula, thank you very much for your kind words.

I was a bit in a hurry while I was studying the image last night so I didn't notice there were branches in front of the sun and I thought it was intentionally created by hiring professional photographers who used special lenses to get this commercial image. But I realized that it was only a simple copy and paste action. Many photo tools can do this easily. I don't want to mislead anybody, so I have changed my comments. The image hasn't got anything to do with the reality but commerce.

Hi Don, thank you for the interesting video.

Sometimes, I also record the moon with my video camera and luckily I made some recordings on the same day in Ankara, Turkey; 12 July 2011, Tuesday, between 00:43 and 00:48 TLT (22:43 - 22:48 GMT). I took some snapshots from my recording and compared them with the object in the YouTube video. Unfortunately, I couldn't capture a better screenshot from latter video. I resized my snapshot and rotated it a bit to the left. The original snapshot is there also. My conclusion is that the object in question is the double-mirror reflection of the moon, not the Dark Twin.

Regards

Selim

 

I find it interesting when possible captures of Planet X, moon swirls, or UFOs are unintentionally gifted to the common man via mainstream media.  Below is one:  Lots of sun "ghosts" or whatever they are called in this photo (date taken unknown), but check out the small, white orb around 6:00 o'clock.  Looks like a possible moon swirl to me!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/green/

Photo posted with "Six Tips To Escape The Summer Heat At Home" article at the front page of the Huffington Post Green section.  (The article itself is a good example of the many mainstream media articles designed to help you cope with Planet X related earth changes and/or make it appear that things are not abnormal.  Yeah, sure.) 

Hi Fernando, Don and Georgia, thank you very much for your comments.

I, also,  thought about the reasons for the changing positions of the moon between Ankara, Turkey and Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA and tried to put the two cities and the moon with its position changes on the same image.

I think, the reason for this change is:

1. Changes in the latitude can cause this (but there isn't much difference in latitude:

     Ankara: 36 S 487552,93   E 4418973,68

     TC         : 15 T 464197,48    E 5010673,57), and/or

2. The moon moves about irregularly because of PX influence.

I tried to be as precise as possible to have an idea about the difference in the moon's appearance in the above mentioned places.

 

 

Stanislav, i was watching a video very similar that you just posted....

 

@ James & Christian- I believe what is shown is a lens flare.

Hi Steve, sorry, I was away from home, my computer and programs, so I couldn't comment earlier.

I studied your photos:

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/please-place-your-planet-x...

After analyzing many photos with flares and reflections, I got some ideas about the nature of them, for example,

1. When the lens is directed at the sun, flares and reflections are inevitable,

2. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that all object-like images in photos are all flares and reflections.

When I took the photos below, I moved the camera intentionally to place the reflections where I wanted:

 Your photos can have a Real Object in them:

The angle of the object changes but this is just normal on condition that it is a real object which must move around like other objects in the sky, including the earth (our viewing angle changes continuously and that's why we see the moon in different formations).

You say you tried hard to get rid of flares and reflections but you are still not sure about the object being real, I am not, either.

I believe the best thing to do when shooting the sun is taking 5 pictures like below:

Good Night

Selim

From this morning on east coast of the US.

The sequence image is at one minute intervals.

 

Thank you Beverly and Planet Twelve for your kind words. I studied the photos for a while and decided that it was a reflection. The reasons why I think so are

1. The camera is facing the sun directly and reflections and flares are inevitable,

2. All the pictures are in the same angle and this prevents one from reaching a certain conclusion,

3. The object (R#2) doesn't move independently but along with the sun.

 

If we had the 5 shots, reflections and flares would be eliminated easily.

Good Night

 

Hi Waveguide, you are welcome. Actually, what I mean is the 5-shots in which the sun is placed in 5 different angles. By doing this, an analyst could easily see the movements of the unreal objects in images and decide if the objects are reflections or flares or not. 

Hi Mike. It is a typical reflection. If it appeared in the same position in the 5-shots, it would be a real object. 

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/please-place-your-planet-x...

Here are some examples of the same type of reflections.

The objects looks real and it can be Venus as Beverly stated, but why does it look so big? Maybe, it is related to Blooming of the planets.

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/please-place-your-soho-amp

Joe, thank you very much for your great picture. And thank you, Nancy/Zetas.

This is my bold guess, but the Dark Twin might be projected on the atmosphere which plays a role as screen, the diagram of which I show below. Please be careful that my interpretation might be wrong.

@Taki, you have the diagram right, but the Dark Twin is behind the Earth in their counterclockwise orbit, and is a bit behind the Earth on the dark side of the Earth in the night sky. I moved the sunlight direction to show this. With your permission I will use this diagram in the forthcoming newsletter talking about the Dark Twin and Venus sightings, looming large! Thank you again for all your excellent work.