Somehow Nancy's image is very bright.

https://www.google.com/sky/#latitude=22.61407353592708&longitud...

Thank you Nancy and Andrey ... I was tempted. too, to make this image less bright - but wow, great!

Apparently was not blocked in 2007.

http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/12/nibiru-coordin...

And in 2013 could be found at times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8twW9NmnzE

But realize that Nibiru was MOVING during all this time, so just where to put the black box to block the view was not static.

Incredible. The location matches the coordinates ZetaTalk gave back in 1997.

WOW, so that's how it looks. You win, Nancy.

The deunking has started. We had that with SOHO images too, where upon close exam one could see that the Winged Globe and Moon Swirls were being PASTED into the SOHO archives. It was at that time a German debunking group that was touting this. Documented in this Newsletters Issue. A close check and it is SO SO obvious.

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta559.htm

Now we have the Google Sky cut and past into the past. Nibiru was there in 1950, so they say. Archives altered because Google Sky does NOT take images every day. Satellite images do this too. They are dated and can be months and years old. But not decades old. 

http://postimg.org/image/n1wbreeo5

Nancy Update: It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location, the location of the documented black box, was below the Ecliptic at -6 etc. Where Nibiru should have been. The new flurry is an object at +22, above the ecliptic. Nibiru has not pierced the ecliptic as yet. The +22 object is thus likely to be a real object, showing up on star charts way back when. This was featured in a vid in 2012 and in the lastest flurry on BeforItsNews. That vid has now been removed from YouTube. On that vid I saw the constellation Eridanus noted upper right, so an attempt to confuse with this it would seem. NEITHER the +22 or -6 spots have a star noted by Skymap, my 20 year old program showing the stars and their locations. What we know for sure is that the 2008 "leaked" object was the right location, and Google found they had to put a black box there, for years. Nibiru is likely not there anymore, as this is a MOVING planets.

I think it does not matter even if they were made in 1950 (which is of course not), the fact that it (Nibiru) is. I'm not an expert (in astronomy), but I think there can not be confused.

Gerard has discovered this site, where they list the various archives. DSS, WISE, 2MASS.

.........................

http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/finderchart/#id=Hydra_fin...;

and fill in 5h42m21.00s +22d36m46.0s Equ J2000

Nancy Update: It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location, the location of the documented black box, was below the Ecliptic at -6 etc. Where Nibiru should have been. The new flurry is an object at +22, above the ecliptic. Nibiru has not pierced the ecliptic as yet. The +22 object is thus likely to be a real object, showing up on star charts way back when. This was featured in a vid in 2012 and in the lastest flurry on BeforItsNews. That vid has now been removed from YouTube. On that vid I saw the constellation Eridanus noted upper right, so an attempt to confuse with this it would seem. NEITHER the +22 or -6 spots have a star noted by Skymap, my 20 year old program showing the stars and their locations. What we know for sure is that the 2008 "leaked" object was the right location, and Google found they had to put a black box there, for years. Nibiru is likely not there anymore, as this is a MOVING planets.

@Nancy, 

The debunking has started alright.  "Dr. Astro"  is all over GLP and youtube right now posting his typical enthusiastic debunking efforts.  Sigh.  Will this ever end. 

I was looking for dates, when the Google Sky cover-up black box was in place, when leaked, when lifted, etc. Nibiru also moved from where it was in 2008 to where it was more recently. Here's what I have found.

2007 5h53m27s -6d10m56s was a black box (see below)

2008 leak occurred (image above)

2009 black box still in place https://code.google.com/p/earth-issues/issues/detail?id=416

2011 black box still there http://modernsurvivalblog.com/space/what-in-the-sky-is-google-hiding/

2013 still there at those coordinates http://www.whatwillhappenin2012now.com/planet-x-nibiru/planet-x-loc...

OK, the new coordinates 5h42m21.00s +22d36m46.0s what the Nibiru complex visible in 2012, per this video which is 3 years old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWmIOfyvo5E&feature=youtu.be

Nancy Update: It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location, the location of the documented black box, was below the Ecliptic at -6 etc. Where Nibiru should have been. The new flurry is an object at +22, above the ecliptic. Nibiru has not pierced the ecliptic as yet. The +22 object is thus likely to be a real object, showing up on star charts way back when. This was featured in a vid in 2012 and in the lastest flurry on BeforItsNews. That vid has now been removed from YouTube. On that vid I saw the constellation Eridanus noted upper right, so an attempt to confuse with this it would seem. NEITHER the +22 or -6 spots have a star noted by Skymap, my 20 year old program showing the stars and their locations. What we know for sure is that the 2008 "leaked" object was the right location, and Google found they had to put a black box there, for years. Nibiru is likely not there anymore, as this is a MOVING planets.

Here is the 2008 site, where a leak of Nibiru occurred and where the black box was inserted by Google Sky for years. On the DSS and 2MASS and WISS images, nothing appeares there, although it looks like WISS in 2010 is showing a fuzzy star at that spot where in the earlier images nothing at all. Nibiru is a moving planet, and in those earlier dates would not have been there.

So when Zetas say, "Is this Nibiru on the Google Sky images? Yes." Are they referring to the 2008 image? Or are they saying the new images are Nibiru, but they are in the wrong coordinates?

Nancy Comment: They are referring to the 2008 leaked images. The new images are of an existing star thingie, at +22 way wrong for Nibiru. It seems this was a 2012 fraud, revived to go viral again on the Internet. It sure looked like it could be Nibiru. I got all excited. But the Zetas did not stumble. I guess this was another example of why Nancy has to be on the same page, get the facts lined up before doing ZT, and that Nancy can stumble.

All this is on YouTubes - Zeta Report 67 http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk shows the 2008 location and how it lines up with the Zeta path. Zeta Report 68 http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4 clarifies that the 2008 location is accurate and was a true image of Nibiru, but the later video at +22 Declination is a fraud.

A possible reason for 5h53m -6d10m etc being blocked after it was visible in 2008 on Google Sky is that is the region of the sky where Nibiru would be on 2MASS images (from which the original Google Sky was built) from 1999-2001. Note the entire region the Zetas outlined in 1997 on the Path diagram is through this region.

@Nancy, I think your screenprint below is at +6, not -6. I just went and looked at the 5'53" and -6'17" and it was still blocked.

Nancy's Comment: You're right! I asked to go to Orion and that is where it sent me so I assumed. How odd.

Google Sky and other sky viewing available to the public was established in the main from 2MASS data which was collected ahead of 2001, in fact 1983-2001. This has been supplemented with DSS and other sky survey data. But one must assume that the region where Nibiru would be seen back in the 1990's and even back to 1983 was to the left of Orion, to the left of Orion's Belt in fact, which is the path the Zetas drew in 1997 when they producted this chart. This was the right place for Nibiru at that time, and it was bound to appear on ONE of the charts thus.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/131/2/1163

Between 1997 June and 2001 February the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) collected 25.4 Tbytes of raw imaging data covering 99.998% of the celestial sphere in the near-infrared. 

https://www.sdss3.org/future/sdss4.pdf

The Two-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), which imaged the entire sky in the near-infrared from both southern and northern observatories, producing a huge catalog of stellar photometry and generating clearer views of the Galaxy.