Comments - Nibiru on Google Sky? (ZetaTalk Confirmation for 2008 Leak) - Earth Changes and the Pole Shift2024-03-29T13:14:36Zhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3863141%3ABlogPost%3A1001435&xn_auth=nohere's another capture of tha…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-16:3863141:Comment:10014852015-06-16T23:16:29.742Zcasey ahttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/caseya
<p>here's another capture of that same 2008 leak. <a href="http://s29.photobucket.com/user/Terral03/media/nibirupic.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://s29.photobucket.com/user/Terral03/media/nibirupic.jpg.html</a></p>
<p>here's another capture of that same 2008 leak. <a href="http://s29.photobucket.com/user/Terral03/media/nibirupic.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://s29.photobucket.com/user/Terral03/media/nibirupic.jpg.html</a></p> And my final word on the whol…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-16:3863141:Comment:10014832015-06-16T20:45:19.215ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>And my final word on the whole mess.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><em><strong>Zeta Report 69</strong> <a href="https://youtu.be/jq5H6bhFrA0" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/jq5H6bhFrA0</a> stressed the 2MASS mapping was done years ago and the 2008 Google Sky image likely captured in the 80's or 90's also the story of tracking by Zeta coordinates in 2001-2003.</em></span></p>
<p>And my final word on the whole mess.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><em><strong>Zeta Report 69</strong> <a href="https://youtu.be/jq5H6bhFrA0" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/jq5H6bhFrA0</a> stressed the 2MASS mapping was done years ago and the 2008 Google Sky image likely captured in the 80's or 90's also the story of tracking by Zeta coordinates in 2001-2003.</em></span></p> Considering that the Nibiru "…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-16:3863141:Comment:10011812015-06-16T15:53:16.993ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>Considering that the Nibiru "leak" that showed up in 2007-2008 on Google Sky could have been a 2MASS image from 1983-2001 - look how close it is to the ZetaTalk Path for Nibiru from 1983 on!</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870262?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870262?profile=original" width="656"/></a></p>
<p>Considering that the Nibiru "leak" that showed up in 2007-2008 on Google Sky could have been a 2MASS image from 1983-2001 - look how close it is to the ZetaTalk Path for Nibiru from 1983 on!</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870262?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870262?profile=original" width="656"/></a></p> Google Sky and other sky view…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-16:3863141:Comment:10014812015-06-16T10:41:12.218ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>Google Sky and other sky viewing available to the public was established in the main from 2MASS data which was collected ahead of 2001, in fact 1983-2001. This has been supplemented with DSS and other sky survey data. But one must assume that the region where Nibiru would be seen back in the 1990's and even back to 1983 was to the left of Orion, to the left of Orion's Belt in fact, which is the path the Zetas drew in 1997 when they producted this chart. This was the right place for Nibiru at…</p>
<p>Google Sky and other sky viewing available to the public was established in the main from 2MASS data which was collected ahead of 2001, in fact 1983-2001. This has been supplemented with DSS and other sky survey data. But one must assume that the region where Nibiru would be seen back in the 1990's and even back to 1983 was to the left of Orion, to the left of Orion's Belt in fact, which is the path the Zetas drew in 1997 when they producted this chart. This was the right place for Nibiru at that time, and it was bound to appear on ONE of the charts thus.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/131/2/1163" target="_blank">http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/131/2/1163</a></em></p>
<p><em>Between 1997 June and 2001 February the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) collected 25.4 Tbytes of raw imaging data covering 99.998% of the celestial sphere in the near-infrared. </em></p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.sdss3.org/future/sdss4.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.sdss3.org/future/sdss4.pdf</a></em></p>
<p><em>The Two-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), which imaged the entire sky in the near-infrared from both southern and northern observatories, producing a huge catalog of stellar photometry and generating clearer views of the Galaxy.</em></p> @Nancy, I think your screenpr…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-15:3863141:Comment:10011742015-06-15T22:43:46.934ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisH
<p>@Nancy, I think your screenprint below is at +6, not -6. I just went and looked at the 5'53" and -6'17" and it was still blocked.</p>
<p><strong>Nancy's Comment:</strong> <em>You're right! I asked to go to Orion and that is where it sent me so I assumed. How odd.</em></p>
<p>@Nancy, I think your screenprint below is at +6, not -6. I just went and looked at the 5'53" and -6'17" and it was still blocked.</p>
<p><strong>Nancy's Comment:</strong> <em>You're right! I asked to go to Orion and that is where it sent me so I assumed. How odd.</em></p> A possible reason for 5h53m -…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-15:3863141:Comment:10012732015-06-15T22:05:00.052ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>A possible reason for 5h53m -6d10m etc being blocked after it was visible in 2008 on Google Sky is that is the region of the sky where Nibiru would be on 2MASS images (from which the original Google Sky was built) from 1999-2001. Note the entire region the Zetas outlined in 1997 on the Path diagram is through this region.…</p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870555?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870555?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"></img></a></p>
<p>A possible reason for 5h53m -6d10m etc being blocked after it was visible in 2008 on Google Sky is that is the region of the sky where Nibiru would be on 2MASS images (from which the original Google Sky was built) from 1999-2001. Note the entire region the Zetas outlined in 1997 on the Path diagram is through this region.</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870555?profile=original"><img width="750" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870555?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"/></a><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870620?profile=original"><img width="721" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870620?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="721"/></a></p> All this is on YouTubes - Zet…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-15:3863141:Comment:10011722015-06-15T14:56:20.994ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><em>All this is on YouTubes - <strong>Zeta Report 67</strong> <a href="http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk</a> shows the 2008 location and how it lines up with the Zeta path. <strong>Zeta Report 68</strong> <a href="http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4</a> clarifies that the 2008 location is accurate and was a true image of Nibiru, but the later video at +22 Declination is a…</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><em>All this is on YouTubes - <strong>Zeta Report 67</strong> <a href="http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk</a> shows the 2008 location and how it lines up with the Zeta path. <strong>Zeta Report 68</strong> <a href="http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4</a> clarifies that the 2008 location is accurate and was a true image of Nibiru, but the later video at +22 Declination is a fraud.</em></span></p> So when Zetas say, "Is this N…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-15:3863141:Comment:10014732015-06-15T12:13:37.162ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisH
<p>So when Zetas say, "Is this Nibiru on the Google Sky images? Yes." Are they referring to the 2008 image? Or are they saying the new images are Nibiru, but they are in the wrong coordinates?</p>
<p><strong>Nancy Comment:</strong> <em>They are referring to the 2008 leaked images. The new images are of an existing star thingie, at +22 way wrong for Nibiru. It seems this was a 2012 fraud, revived to go viral again on the Internet. It sure looked like it could be Nibiru. I got all excited. But…</em></p>
<p>So when Zetas say, "Is this Nibiru on the Google Sky images? Yes." Are they referring to the 2008 image? Or are they saying the new images are Nibiru, but they are in the wrong coordinates?</p>
<p><strong>Nancy Comment:</strong> <em>They are referring to the 2008 leaked images. The new images are of an existing star thingie, at +22 way wrong for Nibiru. It seems this was a 2012 fraud, revived to go viral again on the Internet. It sure looked like it could be Nibiru. I got all excited. But the Zetas did not stumble. I guess this was another example of why Nancy has to be on the same page, get the facts lined up before doing ZT, and that Nancy can stumble.</em></p> Here is the 2008 site, where…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-15:3863141:Comment:10012672015-06-15T09:12:01.720ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>Here is the 2008 site, where a leak of Nibiru occurred and where the black box was inserted by Google Sky for years. On the DSS and 2MASS and WISS images, nothing appeares there, although it looks like WISS in 2010 is showing a fuzzy star at that spot where in the earlier images nothing at all. Nibiru is a moving planet, and in those earlier dates would not have been there.…</p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870483?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870483?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"></img></a></p>
<p>Here is the 2008 site, where a leak of Nibiru occurred and where the black box was inserted by Google Sky for years. On the DSS and 2MASS and WISS images, nothing appeares there, although it looks like WISS in 2010 is showing a fuzzy star at that spot where in the earlier images nothing at all. Nibiru is a moving planet, and in those earlier dates would not have been there.</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870483?profile=original"><img width="750" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870483?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"/></a><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870585?profile=original"><img width="750" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870585?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"/></a><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870596?profile=original"><img width="750" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870596?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" width="750"/></a></p> OK, the new coordinates 5h42m…tag:poleshift.ning.com,2015-06-14:3863141:Comment:10012502015-06-14T19:01:04.663ZNancy Liederhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder
<p>OK, the new coordinates 5h42m21.00s +22d36m46.0s what the Nibiru complex visible in 2012, per this video which is 3 years old.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWmIOfyvo5E&feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWmIOfyvo5E&feature=youtu.be</a></p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870440?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870440?profile=original" width="659"></img></a> <strong>Nancy Update:</strong> It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location,…</p>
<p>OK, the new coordinates 5h42m21.00s +22d36m46.0s what the Nibiru complex visible in 2012, per this video which is 3 years old.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWmIOfyvo5E&feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWmIOfyvo5E&feature=youtu.be</a></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870440?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/54870440?profile=original" width="659"/></a><strong>Nancy Update:</strong> It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location, the location of the documented black box, was below the Ecliptic at -6 etc. Where Nibiru should have been. The new flurry is an object at +22, above the ecliptic. Nibiru has not pierced the ecliptic as yet. The +22 object is thus likely to be a real object, showing up on star charts way back when. This was featured in a vid in 2012 and in the lastest flurry on BeforItsNews. That vid has now been removed from YouTube. On that vid I saw the constellation Eridanus noted upper right, so an attempt to confuse with this it would seem. NEITHER the +22 or -6 spots have a star noted by Skymap, my 20 year old program showing the stars and their locations. What we know for sure is that the 2008 "leaked" object was the right location, and Google found they had to put a black box there, for years. Nibiru is likely not there anymore, as this is a MOVING planets.</p>