EARTHQUAKES Worldwide! (Frequently Updated)

Global Earthquake Maps

ANF

EMSC

Global Incident Map

IRIS

SNNC

USGS

Regionally Specific Earthquake Maps

Australia

Canada

Germany

Japan

Iceland
 

 

 

Related Informations:

 

Earthquakes during the poleshift

Earth Wobble

Wobble effect

TT - Earth Wobble

Deep Quakes

Quake Swarms

Pre-Shift Quakes

Magnetic twist and the effects

Wobble sloshing

Scripted Drama

Quake charts

 

 

Additional Information from the F.A.Q:

Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
A: https://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/explaining-the-earth-wobble

 

Q: How can I understand the Magnetosphere?

- About the Magnetosphere
- What the graphs on the Magnetosphere Simulation mean

 

Q: Is there a relationship between disturbances in the magnetosphere and seismic activity?
- Magnetosphere Deformations and Earth Wobble Effects
- Approach to Earthquake Prediction from the Magnetosphere Simulation
- Analysis try; Earthquakes/plate movement and magnetosphere simula...

Altering Earthquakes:

ZetaTalk Aug 7, 2010

As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?

SOZT:   Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many?   EOZT


ZetaTalk Jun 18, 2011

Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?

SOZT:   It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.

We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable.   EOZT



Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.

[Edited by the Moderation]

 

Views: 548042

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 2:59pm
Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 2:41pm

For Recent Earthquakes in the Northwest, PNSN

Webicorders can be seen.

http://www.pnsn.org/req2/

 

Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 2:21pm

Very informative link for Recent Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern U.S.

http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/seismic/recenteqs/REQ2.html

Webicorders can be seen.

Comment by jorge namour on August 31, 2011 at 12:53pm
5.2 2011/08/31 09:56:20 -18.832 167.538 35.0 VANUATU
4.8 2011/08/31 04:01:09 -18.906 167.727 25.8 VANUATU
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/170_-20.php

4.7 2011/08/31 09:32:52 35.454 139.948 72.6 NEAR THE SOUTH COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.7 2011/08/31 09:12:53 38.472 141.790 54.5 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.6 2011/08/31 05:16:38 36.391 142.495 35.2 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/140_35.php
FLASH: Magnitude 4.5 earthquake jolts northeast Japan -- TV
https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=ReutersIndia&origin...

4.7 2011/08/31 07:52:37 49.346 156.029 35.6 KURIL ISLANDS
4.9 2011/08/31 05:02:31 49.235 156.170 34.7 KURIL ISLANDS
4.7 2011/08/30 22:34:10 49.622 155.655 43.1 KURIL ISLANDS
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/160_50.php

4.4 2011/08/31 07:30:03 17.860 -78.733 10.0 JAMAICA REGION
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/280_20.php

4.4 2011/08/31 03:35:19 1.637 92.243 31.0 OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2.9 2011/08/31 03:18:04 35.730 -121.108 6.9 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2.7 2011/08/31 02:49:30 37.537 -118.864 9.5 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
3.7 2011/08/31 01:22:23 35.730 -121.111 7.3 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/240_35.php

5.1 2011/08/31 03:08:30 2.470 96.339 41.5 SIMEULUE, INDONESIA

4.8 2011/08/31 00:53:19 -17.747 -69.492 131.7 TARAPACA, CHILE
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/290_-20.php

4.6 2011/08/30 23:41:31 -34.766 -71.966 52.1 MAULE, CHILE
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/290_-35.php

5.1 2011/08/30 22:51:00 -41.219 -85.279 10.5 WEST CHILE RISE
http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=234046


http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_al...

2011-08-31 04:12:48.5 40.47 N 48.66 E 5 3.0 AZERBAIJAN

2011-08-31 03:29:54.2 35.79 N 30.47 E 5 3.1 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN SEA

http://www.emsc-csem.org/#2

2011-08-30 22:58:41.01 34.37 N 35.86 E 15 3.4 LEBANON - SYRIA REGION
http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=234078
Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 9:16am

The Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale is a seismic scale used in Japan and Taiwan to measure the intensity of earthquakes. It is measured in units ofshindo (震度?, seismic intensity, lit. "degree of shaking"). Unlike the moment magnitude scale (formerly Richter scale), which measures the energy released by the earthquake, the JMA scale describes the degree of shaking at a point on the Earth's surface, and is analogous to the Mercalli intensity scale. The intensity of an earthquake is not totally determined by its magnitude, and varies from place to place; for example, a quake may be described as "shindo 4 in Tokyo, shindo 3 in Yokohama, shindo 2 in Shizuoka".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Meteorological_Agency_seismic_in...

Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 8:59am




11:49 JST 25 Aug 2011 11:45 JST 25 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.7 1
10:32 JST 25 Aug 2011 10:28 JST 25 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.7 1
10:18 JST 25 Aug 2011 10:14 JST 25 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.7 1
09:24 JST 25 Aug 2011 09:19 JST 25 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Hokuto-oki M3.0 1
07:57 JST 25 Aug 2011 07:52 JST 25 Aug 2011 Tokara-retto Kinkai M2.7 1
07:35 JST 25 Aug 2011 07:31 JST 25 Aug 2011 Iwate-ken Oki M3.2 1
04:45 JST 25 Aug 2011 04:40 JST 25 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M2.9 1
01:27 JST 25 Aug 2011 01:22 JST 25 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Hokuto-oki M4.5 1
01:01 JST 25 Aug 2011 00:56 JST 25 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Nambu M3.2 2
23:03 JST 24 Aug 2011 22:58 JST 24 Aug 2011 Tokachi-chiho Hokubu M4.1 1
22:44 JST 24 Aug 2011 22:40 JST 24 Aug 2011 Hokkaido Nansei-oki M3.5 1
20:43 JST 24 Aug 2011 20:38 JST 24 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.4 1
10:58 JST 24 Aug 2011 10:54 JST 24 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.0 1
09:03 JST 24 Aug 2011 08:59 JST 24 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.5 1

 

Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 8:58am




08:38 JST 26 Aug 2011 08:34 JST 26 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.0 2
08:13 JST 26 Aug 2011 08:09 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.1 2
06:24 JST 26 Aug 2011 06:20 JST 26 Aug 2011 Akita-ken Nairiku-nambu M2.1 1
05:18 JST 26 Aug 2011 05:13 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.9 1
05:17 JST 26 Aug 2011 05:12 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Nakadori M2.6 1
04:29 JST 26 Aug 2011 04:25 JST 26 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.6 2
04:16 JST 26 Aug 2011 04:12 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.2 1
21:12 JST 25 Aug 2011 21:05 JST 25 Aug 2011 Chiba-ken Hokutobu M3.0 1
21:07 JST 25 Aug 2011 21:03 JST 25 Aug 2011 Chiba-ken Hokutobu M3.7 2
20:24 JST 25 Aug 2011 20:20 JST 25 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.5 2
18:58 JST 25 Aug 2011 18:54 JST 25 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M2.9 1
18:27 JST 25 Aug 2011 18:23 JST 25 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.5 2
17:43 JST 25 Aug 2011 17:39 JST 25 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.0 1
13:12 JST 25 Aug 2011 13:07 JST 25 Aug 2011 Iwate-ken Oki M4.2 2
11:49 JST 25 Aug 2011
Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 8:57am
11:39 JST 27 Aug 2011 11:35 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M4.3 3
10:13 JST 27 Aug 2011 10:08 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.3 1
09:51 JST 27 Aug 2011 09:45 JST 27 Aug 2011 Tokara-retto Kinkai M3.1 2
09:21 JST 27 Aug 2011 09:16 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.6 2
06:27 JST 27 Aug 2011 06:22 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M2.5 1
06:00 JST 27 Aug 2011 05:56 JST 27 Aug 2011 Tochigi-ken Hokubu M2.2 2
01:55 JST 27 Aug 2011 01:51 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.6 2
21:31 JST 26 Aug 2011 21:26 JST 26 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Nambu M3.6 2
20:12 JST 26 Aug 2011 20:08 JST 26 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M3.5 1
19:01 JST 26 Aug 2011 18:57 JST 26 Aug 2011 Aomori-ken Toho-oki M3.1 1
16:42 JST 26 Aug 2011 16:37 JST 26 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.5 1
13:02 JST 26 Aug 2011 12:57 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.8 1
11:44 JST 26 Aug 2011 11:39 JST 26 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.5 2
09:41 JST 26 Aug 2011 09:36 JST 26 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Nambu M2.5 1
08:38 JST 26 Aug 2011 08:34 JST 26 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.0 2
/body>
Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 8:56am




23:34 JST 27 Aug 2011 23:29 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.8 2
19:19 JST 27 Aug 2011 19:14 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.7 1
19:16 JST 27 Aug 2011 19:11 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.7 1
18:22 JST 27 Aug 2011 18:17 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.8 1
18:19 JST 27 Aug 2011 18:14 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.7 1
17:50 JST 27 Aug 2011 17:45 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M2.8 1
17:49 JST 27 Aug 2011 17:44 JST 27 Aug 2011 Iwate-ken Oki M4.1 1
16:22 JST 27 Aug 2011 16:17 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.9 1
14:14 JST 27 Aug 2011 14:09 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.3 2
14:09 JST 27 Aug 2011 14:05 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.3 4
13:59 JST 27 Aug 2011 13:50 JST 27 Aug 2011 Miyakojima Kinkai M3.5 2
13:55 JST 27 Aug 2011 13:50 JST 27 Aug 2011 Miyakojima Kinkai M3.5 1
13:51 JST 27 Aug 2011 13:47 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.4 1
11:43 JST 27 Aug 2011 11:37 JST 27 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.9 2
11:39 JST 27 Aug 2011
Comment by Kojima on August 31, 2011 at 8:52am
20:17 JST 28 Aug 2011 20:13 JST 28 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.0 1
18:42 JST 28 Aug 2011 18:37 JST 28 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.3 1
18:27 JST 28 Aug 2011 18:23 JST 28 Aug 2011 Wakayama-ken Hokubu M4.0 3
13:51 JST 28 Aug 2011 13:47 JST 28 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.1 1
10:27 JST 28 Aug 2011 10:23 JST 28 Aug 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.2 1
09:58 JST 28 Aug 2011 09:54 JST 28 Aug 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.2 1
09:56 JST 28 Aug 2011 09:52 JST 28 Aug 2011 Osumi-hanto Toho-oki M4.2 1
04:54 JST 28 Aug 2011 04:49 JST 28 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Kinkai M4.2 2
02:30 JST 28 Aug 2011 02:25 JST 28 Aug 2011 Tokyo-to Nijusan-ku M3.5 1
01:19 JST 28 Aug 2011 01:14 JST 28 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Kinkai M4.1 2
00:55 JST 28 Aug 2011 00:50 JST 28 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Kinkai M4.5 2
00:49 JST 28 Aug 2011 00:44 JST 28 Aug 2011 Amami-oshima Kinkai M3.5 1
23:39 JST 27 Aug 2011 23:34 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 2
23:37 JST 27 Aug 2011 23:32 JST 27 Aug 2011 Wakayama-ken Nambu M3.3 1
23:34 JST 27 Aug 2011 23:29 JST 27 Aug 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.8 2

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2024   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service