Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.

  • Twitter: @NancyLieder1
  • If your questions are just a demand for a hand-held tour, and it is apparent you have not even attempted to research or read the existing material, your post will be deleted.
  • Commentary chitchat will automatically be deleted if it does not add to the questions already posed. The weekly Q&A chat is not a stage for opinions or rants. 
  • Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.

Accepted questions will be noted as such.

  • If Nancy indicates that your question is “accepted” then it will be answered.
  • If not, assume it has been declined by the Zetas.
  • The Q&A discussions just past and ongoing are pinned for easy reference.
  • Answers will be posted monthly to the ZetaTalk websites. The discussion will be closed with a new discussion opened for the following month at that time.
  • To find all prior chats on the ning, go to this list:

Ning Rules that Apply

  1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to suspension.
  2. The existence of Planet X and the truthfulness of ZetaTalk are not debatable.
  3. This ning does not focus on religion or politics, so these types of questions will be declined as a distraction from the issue at hand.
  4. ZetaTalk only. Posting of or discussion regarding material alleged to be channeled or otherwise relayed by entities other than the STO Zetas to anyone other than Nancy Lieder of is not allowed on this site

Zeta Rules that Apply

  1. No personal counseling is done.This rule has been in place since 1996. Questions should be of broad interest to the general public.
  2. Correlation or resolution of ZetaTalk with the work of other channels or authors is not done unless they predict and have a prediction accuracy track record, as otherwise they are not a peer of ZetaTalk which does so. This rule has been in place since 2002. Just because another website or author makes a statement does not make that statement true, nor will the Zetas explain to you why their statements are not true, as then they are taking time out to address the issue.
  3. The Zetas, as all visitors, are under rules on how they interact with humanity. They are not here to rescue you. They cannot divert Planet X just as today they do not prevent droughts or floods. The Earth is mankind’s schoolhouse whereby he learns to help his fellow man.
  4. The date of the pole shift cannot be given, but the sequence of events can be given. [ Link ] Check the ning pinned discussions and blogs for such information as the 7 of 10, the last weeks, etc.

Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.

This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 78 years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.

Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.

Views: 54879

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Nancy,

On 22nd of April Iran successfully launched and orbited their first military satellite and its on its way to America based on its trajectory. The intention of this military satellite cannot be for good intention and it is disappointed that no interventions have been taken so far. It is also hard to believe that US intelligence doesn't know the intent of this satellite (such as EMP attack) and they must have plans to counter their moves whatever they might be. Would zetas like to comment on this. Many thanks.

Accepted via email:

Today, April 27, almost all news sites in the world published the news that the Pentagon has officially published a video of a UFO. There is a video by CNN. This topic was already touched upon earlier by CNN, on September 18. And on RT and other news sites. For what purpose did you again touch on this topic and what kind of UFO got on those videos, knowing that they are being watched? Is it connected with the next step towards declaring Nibiru and other extraterrestrial civilizations? Officially confirmed UFO videos from the government are very rare.
[and from another]
April 27, 2020
Pentagon officially releases UFO
The Pentagon has officially released three short videos showing "unidentified aerial phenomena" that had previously been released by a private company.
[and from another]
US Navy confirms UFO videos are the real deal
[and from another]
Dec 16, 2017
Exclusive analysis brought to you by To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science: FLIR1 is the second of three US military videos of unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) that has been through the official declassification review process of the United States government and approved for public release.
[and from another]
September 18, 2019
For many years, our aviators didn't report these incursions because of the stigma attached to previous terminology and theories about what may or may not be in those videos.
[and from another]
April 27, 2020
On the records made from military aircraft, some flying objects are visible, which in appearance cannot be attributed either to airplanes, or to helicopters, or to other known aircraft.

A year ago on April 23, 2019 the US Navy made a rule change
to allow pilots to report Unexplained Aerial Phenomena. This avoided countless rules to repress such reporting of Unidentified Flying Objects. Disclosure has now moved up the ranks to the Pentagon, which is now releasing multiple videos. The UFO phenomenon has been official acknowledged, with release of files, by Chile
in 2007, France
in 2008, the UK
in 2008, China
in 2009, and Russia
in 2013. The US media gave in and reported a UFO blitz
on New Year’s Eve 2014. The US countered by debunking with the Blue Book files
in 2015. The US has been late to the show.

The US is considered the brake on disclosure, as they hold evidence, including alien bodies, from the Roswell crash. Where Russia and Brazil have similar evidence of the alien presence, they are reluctant to disclose this if the US is still in a debunking mode. All must agree, and release their files, for any to be credible. Official disclosure in the US still has a long way to go, as videos of Unexplained Aerial Phenomena do not make the leap to presenting alien bodies to the public. Just when the US takes that step is still an unknown, and very much in the hands of man.

Prior ZT:
Beyond reducing the fear of reporting UFO incidents, what is the point of this new Navy rule change? Instead of reporting a UFO they will be reporting an “unexplained aerial phenomena”. What the public is not seeing is the plethora of rules related to UFOs. Anyone reporting a UFO, either by claiming to be a witness or just passing along information, is liable to be demoted or put under a mental health evaluation! How else to keep the alien presence a secret all these decades? This is still the case for the much restricted Air Force, however. Is disclosure being expedited by this move? Without question, as UFOs can now be written into the official record, and ultimately accessed by the public. This move by the Navy is a fresh start.

As is our usual practice, we are closing out this April Q&A and opening the May Q&A. Please post your questions there. Thank you. (


SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk


This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit


Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2023   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service