EARTHQUAKES Worldwide! (Frequently Updated)

Global Earthquake Maps

ANF

EMSC

Global Incident Map

IRIS

SNNC

USGS

Regionally Specific Earthquake Maps

Australia

Canada

Germany

Japan

Iceland
 

 

 

Related Informations:

 

Earthquakes during the poleshift

Earth Wobble

Wobble effect

TT - Earth Wobble

Deep Quakes

Quake Swarms

Pre-Shift Quakes

Magnetic twist and the effects

Wobble sloshing

Scripted Drama

Quake charts

 

 

Additional Information from the F.A.Q:

Q: What is the "Earth Wobble"?
A: https://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/explaining-the-earth-wobble

 

Q: How can I understand the Magnetosphere?

- About the Magnetosphere
- What the graphs on the Magnetosphere Simulation mean

 

Q: Is there a relationship between disturbances in the magnetosphere and seismic activity?
- Magnetosphere Deformations and Earth Wobble Effects
- Approach to Earthquake Prediction from the Magnetosphere Simulation
- Analysis try; Earthquakes/plate movement and magnetosphere simula...

Altering Earthquakes:

ZetaTalk Aug 7, 2010

As of late, I have observed that USGS and EMSC are a bit lax on their reports of earthquakes. Sometimes not seeing anything reported for hours from the last update, or seeing periods of 90-200 minutes with no earthquakes in between. My question is, are they leaving swarms of earthquakes out of their reports, or there are actually periods of no earthquakes?

SOZT:   Greater than 90% of the earthquake activity is being altered by the USGS at present, which is under orders to prevent any clue being given to the public about the Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. Over a decade ago, the approach was to de-sensitize the live seismographs periodically, so the displays do not turn black worldwide, and to ignore the twice-a-day patterns showing up on these seismographs. Then any quakes that could be dropped were dropped. This was obvious to some who were watching the database manipulation. Quakes in the list would suddenly disappear. This was particularly the case where a quake happened in a remote location, or out in the ocean. Dumbing down the magnitude quickly followed, but in order to ensure the public did not notice, the USGS took control of all websites reporting quake statistics. At times, this control breaks, and discrepancies are reported to the public. Some countries rebel. Quake swarms are another source of control, as they pepper the databases with many quakes and skew the statistics, and thus are pulled from the database. Else the question is raised, why so many?   EOZT


ZetaTalk Jun 18, 2011

Will the USGS internet system be a reliable warning system for the European tsunami by registering on the net the New Madrid earthquake on the exact time it occurs?

SOZT:   It will not be a lack of information from the USGS that will be the point of confusion during the earthquakes leading up to the New Madrid adjustment, it will be knowing which quake is the big one vs the many minor quakes preceding it. The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9.

We would advise that rather than watching the USGS quake statistics, that you watch the Earth changes. The adjustment that will incite the European tsunami will involve bridges on the Mississippi breaking, and being impassable. The land to the west of the Mississippi will drop so that the Mississippi will become 50 miles wide in the state of Mississippi. Watch for this. The New Madrid adjustment will be several large quakes of magnitude 8-9, though will be listed as a lesser magnitude. As the N American continent continues to unzip up to and along the Seaway, the quakes will be less than a magnitude 8 but very destructive to Cleveland and Toledo and Buffalo and the inland locks along the Seaway. Thus it is not what the USGS says that should be watched, but the condition of the bridges on the Mississippi, the impact on the cities along the Seaway, and whether the inland locks are reported as inoperable.   EOZT



Please collect earthquake-reports here. Significant Quakes or Magnitude 7+ can be posted separately.

[Edited by the Moderation]

 

Views: 548308

Comment

You need to be a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift to add comments!

Join Earth Changes and the Pole Shift

Comment by Weston Ginther on January 25, 2012 at 1:33am

2011 Worst Ever Year for Earthquake Damage

Jan 24, 2012

 

2011 was the most damaging year on record for economic losses due to earthquakes, according to a new report. Japan and New Zealand were hardest hit.

The year 2011 had the highest global economic losses due to earthquakes on record, according an analysis by the Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM) released in January 2012. Last year, earthquakes and their consequences, such as tsunamis, landslides, and ground settlements, caused a damage of 365 billion U.S. dollars. According to this analysis, 20,500 people died, about a million people lost their homes....

 

READ MORE

 

Comment by jorge namour on January 24, 2012 at 7:58pm

4.8 2012/01/24 17:07:00 45.994 143.068 338.6 HOKKAIDO, JAPAN REGION

4.9 2012/01/24 16:48:22 -41.234 -85.970 10.0 WEST CHILE RISE
http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=252261

5.4 2012/01/24 16:31:08 -56.355 -27.930 8.3 SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS REGION
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/330_-55.php

4.5 2012/01/24 16:26:48 54.884 -159.910 47.9 SOUTH OF ALASKA

4.5 2012/01/24 14:33:29 19.586 -70.061 2.8 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/290_20.php

3.8 2012/01/24 12:11:29 38.969 -122.693 3.1 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

3.3 2012/01/24 11:12:31 19.165 -64.894 6.6 VIRGIN ISLANDS REGION

5.2 2012/01/24 10:34:20 8.614 126.143 196.1 MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/125_10.php

3.0 2012/01/24 06:01:29 37.403 -113.875 1.2 UTAH
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/245_35.php

2.5 2012/01/24 03:36:59 39.339 -117.775 10.8 NEVADA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/240_40.php

4.6 2012/01/24 01:45:28 -34.535 -71.886 34.0 LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE

4.9 2012/01/24 00:33:46 12.606 143.661 19.3 GUAM REGION

2.8 2012/01/24 00:21:09 19.381 -155.244 3.4 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII
2.7 2012/01/23 19:25:07 19.327 -155.124 7.5 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII
2.8 2012/01/23 12:08:28 20.079 -156.143 6.0 MAUI REGION, HAWAII

4.7 2012/01/23 23:41:09 -1.975 100.265 53.0 SOUTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

5.0 2012/01/23 21:55:15 -36.317 -73.123 20.4 OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE
4.9 2012/01/23 17:22:11 -36.343 -73.223 28.1 OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE

4.0 2012/01/23 13:18:08 32.599 89.196 55.7 WESTERN XIZANG

4.8 2012/01/23 12:40:29 4.952 96.284 50.3 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

5.3 2012/01/23 11:45:43 37.093 141.040 49.8 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

4.5 2012/01/23 04:16:06 -9.602 113.347 58.3 SOUTH OF JAVA, INDONESIA

4.7 2012/01/23 03:27:03 -19.763 -178.323 582.9 FIJI REGION

4.7 2012/01/22 16:26:27 72.577 5.132 10.0 NORWEGIAN SEA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/0_75.php

4.2 2012/01/22 11:25:24 38.678 44.166 5.0 TURKEY-IRAN BORDER REGION
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_al...

2012-01-24 07:07:57 14.77 -93.24 16 3.9 84 km al SUROESTE de MAPASTEPEC, CHIS MEXICO AFTRERSHOCKS
http://www.ssn.unam.mx/ SISMICIDAD RECIENTE- Ultimos sismos

2012-01-24 17:46:42. 40.26 N 27.03 E 7 2.6 WESTERN TURKEY SWARM
2012-01-24 17:37:19.21hr38.76 N 43.36 E 29 2.0 EASTERN TURKEY SWARM

2012-01-24 17:06:58.0 46.14 N 143.00 E 318 4.7 SAKHALIN, RUSSIA

2012-01-24 16:43:33.3 41.66 N 2

Comment by Weston Ginther on January 24, 2012 at 2:36am

6.3 -- South of the Fiji Islands

 

Magnitude: 6.3
Date-Time: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 00:52:06 UTC
Location: 24.959°S, 178.611°E
Depth: 582.8 km (362.2 miles)
Region: SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS

Comment by Weston Ginther on January 24, 2012 at 1:54am

The 4.7 eq in Morocco reported by EMSC isn't showing up on the USGS website..

 

Comment by jorge namour on January 24, 2012 at 12:59am
Comment by jorge namour on January 23, 2012 at 5:24pm

2012-01-23 16:04:55 6.0 36.36°S 73.12°W 24 M Near Coast of Central Chile GEOFON
http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/eqinfo/event.php?id=gfz2012bpkx
http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/eqinfo/list.php
2012-01-23 16:04: 36.37 S 72.91 W 8 5.6 OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE
http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=252096

Comment by jorge namour on January 23, 2012 at 4:45am

More quakes follow 5.0 shaker on Big Island - HAWAII Posted: Jan 22, 2012 11:53 PM
Updated: Jan 23, 2012 12:15 AM

VOLCANO, Hawaii Island (HawaiiNewsNow) - A series of earthquakes shook an area of southeast Hawaii island Sunday afternoon, one of them a 5.0 magnitude quake.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, all of the quakes were centered in an area about eleven miles southeast of the town of Volcano on the Big Island. The first quake occurred at 4:35 p.m. with a magnitude of 4.1. That quake was followed a minute later by one with a 5.0 magnitude.

Five more smaller quakes followed at 4:43, 4:44, 4:45, 4:51 and 4:52 p.m., with preliminary magnitudes of 2.5, 2.3, 3.0, 1.8 and 2.0

The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said no tsunami was generated by the quakes.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/16575298/50-quake-shakes-big-island

3.0 2012/01/23 02:45:33 19.342 -155.130 6.5 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII
2.5 2012/01/23 02:43:47 19.329 -155.101 8.2 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII
5.0 2012/01/23 02:36:32 19.331 -155.120 8.0 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII
4.1 2012/01/23 02:35:32 19.320 -155.120 7.3 ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAI
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/205_20.php
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_al...

Comment by Granny Bear on January 23, 2012 at 4:06am

5.0 Md - ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII


Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 5.0 Md
Date-Time
  • 23 Jan 2012 02:36:32 UTC
  • 22 Jan 2012 16:36:32 near epicenter
  • 22 Jan 2012 21:36:32 standard time in your timezone
Location 19.331N 155.119W
Depth 8 km
Distances
  • 16 km (10 miles) S (176 degrees) of Fern Forest, HI
  • 18 km (11 miles) S (184 degrees) of Eden Roc, HI
  • 18 km (11 miles) SE (137 degrees) of Volcano, HI
  • 42 km (26 miles) S (185 degrees) of Hilo, HI
  • 358 km (222 miles) SE (127 degrees) of Honolulu, HI
Location Uncertainty Horizontal: 0.5 km; Vertical 0.3 km
Parameters Nph = 74; Dmin = 5.0 km; Rmss = 0.13 seconds; Gp = 133°
M-type = Md; Version = 1
Event ID HV 60302526
Comment by Granny Bear on January 22, 2012 at 10:29pm

5.2 Mb - LAKE RUDOLF REGION, KENYA Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 5.2 Mb Date-Time 22 Jan 2012 21:03:36 UTC 23 Jan 2012 00:03:36 near epicenter 22 Jan 2012 16:03:36 standard time in your timezone Location 3.623N 36.037E Depth 15 km Distances 73 km (46 miles) NE (38 degrees) of Lodwar, Kenya 193 km (120 miles) NE (51 degrees) of Moroto, Uganda 274 km (170 miles) SW (216 degrees) of Gidole, Ethiopia 433 km (269 miles) N (360 degrees) of Nakuru, Kenya 530 km (330 miles) NE (46 degrees) of KAMPALA, Uganda Location Uncertainty Horizontal: 18.4 km; Vertical 6.8 km Parameters Nph = 90; Dmin = 542.1 km; Rmss = 0.86 seconds; Gp = 75° M-type = Mb; Version = 3 Event ID US c0007q8x For updates, maps, and technical information, see: Event Page or USGS Earthquake Hazards Program National Earthquake Information Center U.S. Geological Survey http://neic.usgs.gov/

Comment by Kojima on January 22, 2012 at 3:50pm

Propagation of Slow Slip Leading Up to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake

Abstract [Science: Published Online January 19 2012]

Many large earthquakes are preceded by one or more foreshocks, but it is unclear how these foreshocks relate to the nucleation process of the mainshock. On the basis of an earthquake catalog created using a waveform correlation technique, we identified two distinct sequences of foreshocks migrating at rates of 2 to 10 km/day along the trench axis toward the epicenter of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. The time history of quasistatic slip along the plate interface, based on small repeating earthquakes that were part of the migrating seismicity, suggests that two sequences involved slow slip transients propagating toward the initial rupture point. The second sequence, which involved large slip rates, may have caused substantial stress loading, prompting the unstable dynamic rupture of the mainshock.

SEARCH PS Ning or Zetatalk

 
Search:

This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit

Donate

Donate to support Pole Shift ning costs. Thank you!

© 2024   Created by 0nin2migqvl32.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service