Determine Your Safe Locations - 7 Steps

 

As presented by the Zetas during the September 11, 2010 chat.


Step 1

is to research your location in the Safe Locations information (http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfo242.htm) on the ZetaTalk website. In this you should examine not only your country, your state or province, or your city but also any nearby. Your specific town may not be covered but the whole river valley may be predicted to flood and to flood permanently. This would be a clue that your specific town will be likewise affected. We cannot and have not addressed every spot on Earth, due to time and energy constraints, as we expect you to have a brain and take this approach.

Step 2
is to research your location from the standpoint of the climate that will exist after the pole shift. This is quickly ascertained by looking at the New Geology map. This is a free map which can be cut out and taped together and will give a general idea of the latitude to expect. If your chosen location is where one of the new poles will be, this is a clue that you need to rethink or plan a migration route. This is likewise the case if your chosen location will be on land that will sink below the waves entirely, such as India or western Australia.

Large Scale version: Click Me

Step 3
is to research your elevation above sea level. A handy and free tool is Google Earth (http://www.google.com/earth/index.html) which can be downloaded into a PC and will show the exact elevation of any spot the cursor passes over. HeyWhatsThat is a website that provides you with a color coded map based on a changing elevation. Our advice to be 100 miles from a coastline and 200 feet above sea level to avoid the coastal tidal waves during the pole shift should be applied. You can determine your current elevation and whether your location will be 675 feet above sea level where the water will rise within 2 years after the pole shift. A rough guide in this matter is the map Nancy created.


Step 4
is to determine the effect if you are in one of those regions which will rise or fall. India and western Australia will be below the waves as of the time of the pole shift, and being pushed down before the pole shift. Japan gains 150 feet, New Zealand gains 500 feet and eastern Australia benefits also, Spain loses 50 feet, western UK loses 150 feet, New England gains 450 feet due to the Seaway rip, Florida loses 150 feet, and Vancouver Island gains 100 feet.



Step 5
is to research the effect of swollen rivers which will likely be in a backwash during the pole shift. We have stated that ALL rivers will be over their banks, so the worst possible scenario should be assumed. What will happen if the river cannot drain? Despite having a good sea level elevation, any land that does not have an advantage of being at least 200 feet in elevation over a major river bottom in the vicinity is likely to be flooded. A backwash from the main river in your vicinity should be assumed, so that creeks will not drain, for instance. Water on the move (http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p103.htm) tears and bites and scours, and will undercut the soil under buildings so they will tilt and tumble. Being on solid rock that will not melt in this scenario is advised. Tidal bore along cliffs facing the ocean can likewise have water climbing up, or funneled up by ravines which will direct water all the way to Guadalajara from the Pacific, for example. Think this through, for your location, and be on the safe side.

Step 6
is to examine your volcanic or geographic risk due to mountain building. We have advised a 100 mile radius from all volcanoes that have been active within the last 10,000 years, and that Yellowstone will not become a super volcano. You can determine if the new westerly winds will blow volcanic ash in your direction. Consider that what was formerly north will now be west or east. Fire storms, though extremely rare, almost always occur near erupting volcanoes during the hour of the pole shift. We have advised that if in areas subject to mountain building that old rock not shattered is a good guide to what will survive, and newly fractured rock is a clue that more of the same might be expected. Older mountains as the Alps and Appalachians are considered safe, where the Sierras and Andes are building.



Step 7
is to ascertain if you need a migration route. It is possible to survive the pole shift by avoiding tidal waves and staying outside of structures that will crush you, but to be in a position to be flooded within 2 years after the pole shift. Siberia is a case in point. Here the land is so low in elevation that vast swaths of land will be flooded, and survivors must plan to migrate on foot or via boat. Survivors near the new N Pole off the Bulge of Brazil might consider migrating toward the Andes and their familiar tropical warmth. Such migration, and your target location, can be plotted. Migration routes can be expected to be crowded, so should be avoided as a location for survival camps in general.

Views: 374826

Comments are closed for this blog post

Comment by Malou (Marie Louise) Geleff on April 3, 2012 at 11:58pm

@ Arto : you´ve got that right. 

For a closer visual, try this : http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/mikes-modified-globe

For instance, Coriolis will remain Coriolis after the PS - it´s only the crust that´s moved ! 

Comment by Arto on April 3, 2012 at 7:29pm

Hello.

.."You can determine if the new westerly winds will blow volcanic ash in your direction".

Hmm.. How do I do this?

Finland will be pretty close to the new equator. So do I get this right: Westerly winds are between 30 and 60 degrees, so this will NOT be a problem near the new equator, like in Finland? Or opposite?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Map_prevailing_w...

Comment by Starr DiGiacomo on February 6, 2012 at 6:53pm

Antoinette, Welcome to the ning.  Here is ZT on South Africa but you have alot of reading to do.  Go to the main ning page and follow directions with each step.  Also punch in South Africa in the blogs search engine and read read read everything that has been posted on South Africa earth changes.  Hope this helps.

South Africa


South Africa will fare well after the pole shift, due to it's close location to the new equator and high ground. Being relatively remote as an industrialized country, it may also fare well in retaining some of its technology, being used to relying upon itself rather than others. Some electricity will most likely be generated, and road repairs done. Imported food stuffs will stop after the shift, but with an improved climate and distance from volcanoes, some crop growing will succeed. South Africa's largest problem will be during the shift itself, as it lies between the Atlantic and Indian Ocean. During India's subduction, an actual suction will occur there, drawing water. When the Atlantic widens, a similar situation will occur. During the week when rotation stops, the waters of the earth will drift toward the poles, so during the shift will have a tendency to rush to fill the gaps in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Water on the move is unpredictable and forceful, and South Africa will stick out into this maelstrom unprotected. Those wanting to survive the shift should move well inland and return only after water sloshing has stopped, a period of several days, to be safe.

ZetaTalk


Our statement regarding the grid surviving in South Africa should not come as a surprise. Their main problem will be the sloshing expected along their coastlines and the scouring of water rushing to and fro between the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. It also is more than 100 miles from any volcano, and will not be directly downwind from ash after the pole shift. South Africa does not sink or mountain build, nor is it riddled with fault lines. It is, rather, on solid rock, and not the type of rock subject to sinkholes or the type of soil subject to landslides. It is also primarily a rural country, so that agriculture can continue and the greater damage restricted to cities. Thus, beyond the damage that magnitude 9 quakes and hurricane force winds will do, its infrastructure will hold. Electrical grids are poles and wires and substations. Where all are likely to be damaged, they are repairable from inventory items at hand. Thus, our prediction that the grid will be operations, at least to some degree, after the pole shift in South Africa.

ZetaTalk ™ 2010


That S Africa is a seismically inactive location can be seen from the media reaction to a mere 3.1 in 2003, and a history of a 6.5 as being the "last big one". This is not to minimize or ridicule concerns about a nuclear power plant in the vicinity. As we have stated, these power plants have automatic controls that shut the reactor down at the slightest hint of earthquake. They also have redundant electrical systems, to avoid the possibility of an outage disabling the control. Your concerns during the 7 of 10 roll, which will of course jolt Africa, are thus unwarranted.

ZetaTalk ™ 2010

Note Polar Flood commentary.
Note 7 of 10 Plate Movement commentary.
Note Elite in Africa

Comment by Derrick Johnson on January 14, 2012 at 10:43am

Carla you also have to follow the steps above using the links in each step to determine how safe your location will be for the pole shift, if it's safe for the Pole Shift then it will be safe for the steps leading up to the shift. And no one can tell you where to go you need to decide that on your own.

Comment by Derrick Johnson on January 14, 2012 at 10:37am

Hi Carla

Here is ZetaTalk about how the Mayan Calendar does not line up with the Gregorian and the 2012 date is based on a guess

http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/26no2011.htm

 Unlike the headlines, neither of these objects refers to the Gregorian year 2012. The Tortuguero monument is a broken tablet that is interpreted to say that the god of war and creation will descend from the sky. There is no reference to 2012 or even a date! The Comalcalco brick in question likewise refers to something that will arrive. Again there is no reference to 2012 or even a date. The Comalcalco brick has an estimated age of 1,300 referring to the Mayan holiday, and is interpreted to refer to the 52 Calendar Round, a Mayan holiday.

We have stated before that mankind has incorrectly lined up the Mayan and Gregorian calendars. Record keeping goes to heck after a pole shift, and after hundreds of years survivors attempt to re-establish their holidays. So the Ceremonial Calendar cannot be used as a guide. The Long Count Calendar is without connection points to either the ceremonial or astronomical calendars. Mankind is used to thinking of the Mayan calendar like they do the Gregorian calendar, where eclipses and returning comets and planetary lineups are recorded along with the dates. The Mayan calendars have none of these.

The age of one of the glyphs used to determine a connection between two calendars was carbon dated with a range of 3-5 years. How precise is that? So you have an ancient language no longer spoken or written so interpretation is a guess. You have a Mayan people practicing ceremonies today after a breach of hundreds of years so their ceremonial calendar is no longer a good guide and is a guess. You have glyphs whose date is a guess, established by carbon dating on wood which is imprecise or carved on stone which cannot be carbon dated. So you have a guess based on a guess based on a guess! All pointing, per those who want to sell books with 2012 in their title, to precisely December 21, 2012.

Clearly something is pending, as per our prediction Planet X arrived in the inner solar system in 2003 and has been wrecking havoc ever since. Clearly the passage, resulting in a pole shift for Earth, a crustal shift, is pending. Even the Annunaki were not able to pinpoint precisely when their planet would return to your Sun. Any long journey results in variables, so the time can vary somewhat. We ourselves are not prefect in our ability to predict, though we are certain of the date of passage to within a 47 days period, and already know the year and trimester involved. As we have often stated, we are not allowed to reveal the date.

2012 was used as a magnet, so that discussions about the many prophecies, the End Time prophecies, could be pointed into the future. When the 2012 craze first began, years ago, this was far into the future and thus considered safe by the establishment, who want first and foremost for their slave classes to tend to their jobs and not rush away from coastal cities. Where ZetaTalk was saying mankind should prepare now, move to their safe locations now, the establishment wanted the common man to think they had plenty of time to prepare. What will they do now that 2012 is upon them, and we are only at the start of the 7 of 10 scenarios? They will fog the issues, finding some reason to point into the future. .

Comment by KM on January 13, 2012 at 6:05pm

@ Carla: take a look at the main page, and also at Zetatalk regarding Belgium.  Here are some links:

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/7-of-10-safe-locations

http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfo242.htm

Comment by Jamie Paulin on November 19, 2011 at 4:22am

Thank you Derrick for clarifying what i already suspected. The Zeta talk on my province seemed promising, with your help, I can now see that the city I love doesn't fare well. I understand how difficult it must be to help everyone, regarding their specific areas, and I truly appreciate your taking the time to address me.  Though devastated regarding Halifax, my will to survive prospers. Thanks again Derrick. Also a thank-you to Souz Riden In my hometown Of Ottawa. 

Comment by Derrick Johnson on November 18, 2011 at 8:52am

@ Jamie

here is additional information about the flood tides during the shift

 

http://zetatalk2.com/index/zeta554.htm

Our rule is 100 miles inland and 200 feet above sea level. We have also made the statement that tidal waves will be 500-600 feet high along the coastlines. There are river basins that will be overflowing with rainwater, and thus a backwash there will create higher tides upriver, [as in the Stratford upon Avon UFO warning]. There are places where tidal bore will happen in hills along the coastline, so extra height is required. We cannot address every spec of land. Go on the safe side, in any such advice you give to people.

 

http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/23oc2010.htm

 There are spots on the globe known for enormous waves, often a surfers delight. A tidal bore is not a wave, although such spots that feature large waves have compressed the area available to the incoming waves somewhat in order for the waves to increase in size. Tidal bore occurs where the rate of compression is sudden, so that no distribution of the incoming tide to the side can occur. Normally, the term is used for a high tide rolling inland along a river, so that a wave perhaps 20 feet high is rolling up the river. But when we refer to a tidal bore during the hour of the pole shift or during large tsunami, where the tide will be from 100 to 600 feet high, the bore rises dramatically. This is normally up along a ravine, with steep sides to retain the water, no escape. A 600 foot tide, so compressed, can rise several thousand feet. The water is stacked upon itself. It cannot go backward, so must go forward. It cannot spread to the side, so must rise. Would the result be an exploding wave at the top as appears in this photo? Yes, because the water in a bore is on the move and under great pressure. It does not rise into a gentle lapping pool. It explodes.

 

ZetaTalk about how even during the sever wobble before the shift the waves will be 200 to 300 feet high ( the city of Halifax will not survive that)

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta586.htm

 


 

Comment by souz riden on November 18, 2011 at 7:02am

to jamie , out there in halifax.... ;p

do use this  and find the best elevations in nova scotia , then plan around that info ** Sea Level Rise Tool  

good luck and keep well,

souz in ottawa, ontario

Comment by Jamie Paulin on November 17, 2011 at 5:06pm

I'm worried about my survival here in Halifax, Nova Scotia. I've read the information provided on my province, and examined the maps, and elevations. what I've read about Nova Scotia's future, sounds less distressful than what i see on the maps. I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me, and recommend a safe zone in my province, that is sure fire?

SEARCH PS Ning and Zetatalk

Loading

Donate

You can support the ning by using the above button. 

 

© 2017   Created by Gerard Zwaan.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service