Council of Worlds at WAR re Announcement Delays

[Nancy Lieder]

Note the location of “Planet 9” and the inbound path for Nibiru provided by the Zetas in 1997. Nibiru arrived, right on schedule in 2003, and right where predicted a full 7 years earlier. Where the Zetas provided the location of the gravity draw represented by the Sun’s dark unlit binary and the inbound Nibiru in 1983, when the IRAS team lofted its infra-red balloon in search of the inbound Nibiru, this location was not provided to the public. All articles in print at that time only referring to the location as the “western edge of the constellation Orion”, quite vague, and the “western edge” is vast. Yet the Zetas pinpointed the location as being just outside the lower bow of Orion. Such is the accuracy of ZetaTalk. How would the public eventually become “aware of the history and accuracy of ZetaTalk predictions” as predicted by the Zetas on April 16, 2016? ? It would seem this is already in process.

---

SOZT March 19, 2016

So what happened to the announcement? Obama lacked the courage. As a result of this colossal failure,  having to disband the Jade Helm structure, the US military reacted. Obama is no longer running the country. Chief of Staff General Dunford is. Ben Fulford has for months been referring to Obama as the US “spokesperson”. Is this true, and how does this work? In that the Middle East, under the direction and press from Israel, Turkey, the Jewish bankers of the Federal Reserve, and the Saudis were supporting ISIS and this threatened to create a force that would not only invade Europe but also create an endless terrorism threat to the US, the military did indeed effect a silent coup. Russia needed to enter the fray, and Dunford, but not Obama, agreed. This will never be admitted, publicly, nor do the parties want this.
EOZT

---

SOZT October 1, 2015
The three major social media outlets in use around the globe all had significant, and simultaneous outages between September 20-24, 2015. Skype had complaints from the UK, Australia, and Japan. Twitter received reports from the US, Australia, and Singapore. FaceBook had the loudest howls, primarily from the US and Europe. Notably these downtimes, some lasting for hours or even days, got no attention in the major media, and there was no real explanation for the outages.  Every Skype user has an account and a password, as do their contacts. Every Skype user can broadcast messages to their contacts, even if these contacts are not presently online. Every twitter use likewise has an account and a password, and by sending a tweet passes information along to subscribers, who can retweet the info in the future. FaceBook users likewise have an account and a password, with many friends who pick up info from each other and pass it along on their FaceBook accounts.  In all of this, the networks themselves are AWARE of the accounts and passwords, and could do a broadcast to all in the event of an announcement. Check your user agreements. This is legal!
EOZT

---

SOZT April 25, 2015
When we announced that the Council of Worlds would be going to war with the elite over their blockage of the announcement, the tools available to the Council were not immediately apparent. Early in the campaign the Sony hack showed one such mechanism, whereby an anonymous hacker revealed embarrassing information about Sony executives. Similarly exposing pedophile activities by Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton and blatant lies by self-promoting media talking heads such as Brian Williams and Bill O’Reilly required nothing more than encouraging contactees to step forward.  In many, many cases a financial loss sufficient to trigger a clash among the elite is a result of an electronic delay during trades. 
EOZT

---

SOZT July 4, 2015
What is the message here? As with other failed launches, this most recent failure is a definitive message from the Council of Worlds. Space X has had success in resupplying the ISS, though has flounded on landing on a floating ocean platform.  Resupply of the ISS is OK, reuse of their launch equipment so as to help the elite escape, not OK. The message now is that the elite should not expect to get into space at all. No escape. The message here is to take all hope away from such plans among the elite. They are to remain on Earth with the common man. We expect the battle to shift from attempts to block the announcement, or deny its meaning, to attempts to enslave the common man in some way. That is another fight, on another day.
EOZT

---

SOZT November 1, 2014
The elite – the wealthy and politically powerful in the world – have continued in their attempts to thwart the announcement by Obama and his partners admitting that Nibiru, aka Planet X exists. We have long stated that the announcement date was set by Obama and Xi at their June 7-8, 2013 meeting in Santa Monica. The flustered slip given by the French Foreign Minister on May 13, 2014 re “500 days
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/17ma2014.htm
until climate chaos” was in reference to this, as the date set was to be 500 days from the 2013 meeting, ie October 20, 2014.
EOZT

---

SOZT November 8, 2014
Relying solely on Russia or China to proceed would get the truth out BUT since the block had always been on the US end, via Reagan’s national security directive, without a confirmation from Obama this is awkward and subject to being countered. If true, where is the confirmation from Obama? It would be packaged as some odd communist attack against Obama going into the elections, to make him seem weak, almost comical. So where is this going now? For us to comment would be to empower the enemy, which of course we will not do. Your curiosity is not as important as having the announcement succeed.
EOZT

---

SOZT December 10, 2014
We have stated that the public will see only the flash and parry of swords from a distance during the Council of Worlds war with the cover-up crowd. Meanwhile, periodic tests of the Emergency Broadcast System in the US are done, to see if the channels are open. As of this writing, they are not yet open. The war is still on, full press. Meanwhile, during the flash and parry of swords, one can see resistance, pleading, panic, and capitulation.
EOZT

[casey a]

FBI recommends no indictment re: Clinton emails

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4rczh8/fbi_directer_come...

[casey a]

Tony Blair decided to invade Iraq before telling public but was 'looking for a reason to do it', says Admiral Lord West

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair-decided-...

(Lord West was the head of the Royal Navy at the time.)

He told The House magazine: "Of course Blair and everyone else will say, 'No, we didn't make the decision until right up to it'. You can always say that, can't you?

"But I would not have told the fleets, the Royal Navy and the Marines, to be ready for war in the northern Gulf by the end of the year. I would not have sailed the Mine Counter-measures Force for the Middle East so they were in place for operations.

[casey a]

MPs plan to impeach Tony Blair over Iraq War using ancient law

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tony-blair-chilcot-in...

The coup against Corbyn was planned to stop him calling for Blair’s head after Chilcot

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14594947.The_coup_against_Corbyn...

[SongStar101]

Hacker releases Clinton Foundation documents

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hacker-releases-clinton-foundatio...

A hacker who claims to have infiltrated the Democratic National Committee's server posted documents on Tuesday he says came from the party's digital files.

The hacker, who identified himself as "Guccifer 2.0" after the Romanian hacker who claimed to have breached Hillary Clinton's ..., published documents that detailed Clinton's weaknesses as a candidate, including a collection of negative press clips about the Clinton Foundation and a list of defenses against attacks on her private email use.

Another document, titled "2016 Democrats Positions Cheat Sheet," listed major policy issues and indicated where Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O'Malley, Jim Webb, Lincoln Chaffee, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden — all former or possible rivals for the Democratic nomination — stood on each issue.

Many of the new documents contained information about how the Clinton campaign and its allies should respond to criticism of the Clinton Foundation's revenue sources given controversy over the fact that the philanthropic network accepted donations from foreign entities while Clinton served as secretary of state.

A memo titled "Attacks on Clinton Family Members" chronicled criticisms of Chelsea Clinton for her inability to answer questions about Clinton Foundation donations and other instances in which Bill Clinton was called a "sexual predator" for his past indiscretions.

Yet another document listed the Clintons' extensive use of private jets funded by corporations and other groups, with potentially problematic trips and their costs highlighted.

The hacker has posted batches of documents purported to have originated on the DNC's server.

The DNC has not yet confirmed or denied the authenticity of the leaked documents.

A cybersecurity breach of the committee's digital infrastructure this month was blamed on the Russian government, although the Kremlin denied any involvement.

=============================================================================

=============================================================================

This is what was the latest just days prior....?

Stunner! DOJ wants to keep Clinton Foundation docs quiet until 2018

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/stunner-doj-wants-to-keep-clinton-founda...

Only a couple of days after Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s tête-à-tête with former President Bill Clinton in Phoenix, her department is asking a federal court for permission to delay release of Clinton Foundation communications with federal employees until 2018 – when Hillary Clinton hopes to be half way through a first term in the White House.

The Daily Caller reported the DOJ motion asking for permission to delay for 27 months producing the correspondence between Hillary Clinton’s top aides while she was secretary of state and the Clinton Foundation’s private operations.

“If the court permits the delay, the public won’t be able to read the communications until October 2018, about 22 months into her prospective first term as president,” the Daily Caller noted. “The four senior Clinton aides involved were Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Michael Fuchs, Ambassador-At-Large Melanne Verveer, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin.

New estimates suggest there are more than 34,000 “potentially responsive documents,” which include communications between Hillary Clinton’s aides and either the Clinton Foundation or Teneo Holdings, where Bill Clinton was a paid consultant, the report said.

The documents had been sought by Citizens United, whose president, David N. Bossie, said the plan is “totally unacceptable.” He accused the federal government of “using taxpayer dollars to protect their candidate, Hillary Clinton.”

Previously the government was supposed to release the documents by July 21, well in advance of the November election and in plenty of time for voters to learn what went on.

But DOJ lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras they wanted more time.

A report developing at virtually the same time documented the calls for Lynch to recuse herself from a DOJ decisio...

The calls were prompted because of a brief meeting Lynch held with Bill Clinton.

WND reported Wednesday that Lynch confessed to meeting with Bill Clinton briefly at the Phoenix airport, which raised questions because of the time and location.

At the time, Lynch claimed the two talked about grandchildren, travels and the like but not the FBI investigation.

Now, Michael Cutler at Front Page Magazine is offering a simple solution to all the questions of propriety that are being raised.

“The stakes could not be higher – yet Loretta Lynch acted in a way that she should clearly understood created that illusion of wrong-doing. … It is impossible to understand her motivation or what she was thinking as she sat on her airplane meeting with Bill Clinton – but one thing is now perfectly clear, she must recuse herself from any involvement in the decision making process where the investigation/prosecution of Hillary Clinton is concerned,” he wrote.

Former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams, at PJ Media, sounded off.

“Whenever Bill Clinton gets on a plane to meet a woman, he’s usually up to no good,” he wrote. “Attorney General Loretta Lynch said her impromptu tarmac summit at Phoenix Sky Harbor was a purely social affair. Golf and grandchildren were on the agenda, she said – and not how a home-brew server crammed with classified information ended up in Bill’s basement.

“However, the attorney general normally doesn’t meet with family members of a target in an active FBI criminal investigation. Hillary is just that – a target in an FBI criminal investigation.”

He continued: “Many won’t believe Lynch and Clinton only discussed grandkids and golf in her cozy jet. But I do. That’s all they needed to discuss for Bill to interfere with a criminal prosecution. Sophisticated insiders don’t need to use clumsy and explicit language. Merely having the tarmac summit interferes with the investigation, even if golf and grandkids were the only topics discussed. The tarmac summit sent a signal. It is a signal to all of the hardworking FBI agents who have the goods on Hillary.

“The attorney general has made it clear what team she is on. The attorney general isn’t on the side of justice. She’s on the Democratic Party team. This is the unspoken message from Lynch to all of the FBI agents on the case and to all the front-line lawyers at the Justice Department: When you send your recommendation to refer Hillary’s case to the grand jury, you had better realize your burden to convince me I should sign off on a grand jury request is higher than you thought. These are my friends.”

[SongStar101]

Brexiters’ Rage against the Elites

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/brexiters-rage-against-the-elit...

Repeat after me: The status quo in the West is not working. . . . The status quo in the West is not working. That’s the meaning of the seminal “Brexit” vote in the United Kingdom on Thursday. It wasn’t merely that those who voted for Britain’s exit from the European Union didn’t like the status quo. Or that it wasn’t serving their particular interests and needs. It was that the status quo is broken. Old structures are crumbling. The West is in a crisis of the old order.

And those pleading with UK voters to cast their ballots for the status quo had essentially placed themselves on the side of dysfunction, of chaos, of menacing threats to the very essence of the West. Uncontrolled immigration. Economic stagnation. A loss of national identity. These constitute the legacy of Europe’s seventy-year march toward more and more integration. Add to that the steady erosion of democratic structures as EU countries ceded more and more control over the lives of their citizens to nameless and faceless bureaucrats in Brussels whose constant preoccupation is the stealthy accumulation of political power—a mission at which they are brilliant.

The wonder of it isn’t that British voters issued this “stunning” rebuke to the status quo. It wasn’t really that stunning in the context of the hydra-headed crisis besetting Europe these days. The wonder of it is that so many British leaders and institutions fought so desperately to preserve a status quo that clearly isn’t working. But that’s always the way. The leaders, the elites, the establishment—those most heavily invested in the status quo—always stand athwart change, even when the voters are telling them that it’s time for new structures, new experiments, new directions.

Consider the most fundamental fault line revealed by the Brexit vote—globalism versus nationalism. Globalism is the ideology of the status quo and of the elites desperately trying to preserve the status quo. These people have contempt for borders and for those who want to preserve borders in order to preserve the national heritage. Nationalism is the cry of ordinary people who don’t hang out at Davos and who wonder why their cultural heritage is under such attack in their own lands.

With the Brexit vote we can make a definitive statement about the tenor of our times. Globalism is out. Nationalism is in. The majority essentially slapped down the UK elites that, like the elites of just about every country throughout the West, have been undermining the traditional culture of Western civilization with a sneering attitude toward those who wished to preserve the values and mores of yore.

The weapon of choice for these elites has been mass immigration, which in England has brought about what writer Benjamin Schwarz has called “the most profound social transformation since the Industrial Revolution.” Schwartz, writing in the American Conservative (of which he is national editor), added that mass immigration in England “hasn’t merely embellished, changed, or even assaulted” the country’s national culture. “Rather, by its very nature . . . it perforce obliterates that culture.”

The Brexit vote reveals the anger and frustration percolating over this development throughout Western societies. In reporting the outcome, the New York Times says, “It was a remarkable victory for the country’s anti-Europe forces, which not long ago were considered to have little chance of prevailing.”

But was it really that remarkable? Wasn’t it inevitable that the people of Britain would rebel against the globalist elites bent on eroding British sovereignty, opening up its borders, assaulting its cultural heritage and turning governmental authority over to Brussels bureaucrats with little or no accountability to UK voters?

Closer to home, one could say the same thing about Donald Trump’s capture of the Republican presidential nomination in this year’s GOP primaries. To paraphrase the Times: “It was a remarkable victory for the country’s anti-elite forces, which not long ago were considered to have little chance of prevailing.” Take the immigration issue. As Trump said in the first GOP nomination-fight debate, the issue wouldn’t even have been getting aired had it not been for him. The status-quo elites didn’t want to talk about it until they could slip amnesty for current illegals into the equation without suffering any political backlash. Who was going to bring it up? That scion of status quo thinking, Jeb Bush? Marco Rubio, he of the burnt fingers? Trump forced the issue, and it turned out to be powerful.

The Brexit vote and the Trump emergence are part of the same Western phenomenon—a gathering backlash against globalism and the antinationalist forces that dominate elite institutions such as big news organizations, universities, think tanks, NGOs and governmental bureaucracies. Europe has been moving inexorably toward more and more integration pretty much since the 1950s. No more. This vote constitutes a turning point. We can’t know precisely what will emerge as Britain and Europe struggle to find a new direction offering greater hope to greater numbers of people marginalized by the bureaucratized EU. But it won’t be the status quo.

As Schwarz wrote some months ago, “The impotent seething abundantly in evidence among Old Britain is rooted in their disfranchisement, in the disdain with which their political and cultural leaders have forsaken them, and in their realization that those leaders, ensorcelled by fatuous slogans and intellectual fashion, in pursuit of vacuous and untested ideas, have irretrievably transformed an ancient nation.” That’s a harsh judgment—and pretty pessimistic on the future of Britain. Perhaps the Brexit vote will prove that Britain’s transformation isn’t quite so irretrievable after all.

Robert W. Merry is a contributing editor at the National Interest and an author of books on American history and foreign policy.

Image: Pixabay/Public domain

[SongStar101]

Brexit vote strips billions of dollars from UK's richest people

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/world/81450698/Brexit-vote-strips-b...

The richest people in the UK lost US$5.5 billion (NZ$7.7 billion) on Friday after the country stunned global markets by voting to leave the European Union.

The drop for the 15 wealthiest Britons tracked by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index came as European markets headed for the biggest fall since 2008 and the sterling plunged to its lowest level in more than 30 years.

Peter Hargreaves, co-founder of Hargreaves Lansdown, the UK's largest retail broker, supported the leave campaign and paid the price in the market reaction to the vote. His net worth tumbled 19 per cent to US$2.9b in mid-day trading, the largest percentage drop among the British billionaires.

The billionaire made the largest donation - £3.2 million - to the leave campaign, according to filings with the UK's Electoral Commission. After stepping down from the Hargreaves Lansdown board in April 2015, the billionaire said that he would welcome the chance to work with the UK Government as it prepares for a future as a non-EU member.

Both sides of the heated campaign over whether to leave or remain in the 28-nation bloc drew prominent billionaire backers. Inventor James Dyson and construction-equipment magnate Anthony Bamford were vocal advocates of Brexit while Richard Branson, Li Ka-shing and George Soros were among those urging to stay.

The country's 15 richest citizens lost a collective US$5.5b as of 3.30pm in London, according to the Bloomberg index. Britain's richest person, Gerald Grosvenor, led the decline with a loss of US$1b, followed by Topshop owner Philip Green, fellow land baron Charles Cadogan and Bruno Schroder, majority shareholder of money manager Schroders Plc.

Green lost almost US$500m and Schroder lost more than US$600m. Grosvenor and Cadogan, whose fortunes are derived mostly from London property, lost a combined US$1.6b based solely on the drop in sterling.

Ad Feedback

BILLIONAIRE REACTION

Virgin Money Holdings, the UK-listed finance business controlled by Richard Branson's closely held Virgin Group, saw its shares fall by the most since November 2014. In a post on Virgin Group's website in response to the referendum's result, Branson said the decision to leave the EU will create volatility and cause damage to Britain's economy, but stressed acceptance of the decision and the nation coming together.

"The UK and its amazing, resilient people have weathered many storms - and with determination, resolve and sense of what is right," Branson wrote in the post, which paid tribute to Labour Party MP Jo Cox, who was killed in her West Yorkshire constituency during the referendum campaign. "Those qualities will be needed over the testing months and years to come."

South Africa's richest person Christo Wiese, who owns UK assets including fashion retailer New Look and grocer Iceland, said his "preference was unguardedly for the UK to remain" and was surprised by the result.

"I don't think it's the end of the EU, I think it's the end of EU as it's currently structured," Wiese said. "It's always had unattractive features alongside it's attractive features. This will make people sit up and say how can we make it better."

Wiese, whose bid for British discount retailer Poundland was rejected last week, said he had no plans to scale back his UK investments or change his strategy.

"We're by and large at the value end of the business scale and that's a very good place to be in Britain today."

BREXIT CONFIDENCE

Hargreaves was unmoved by the negative market reaction. The billionaire said he was confident the decision is the best for Britain and made a bid to help the country shape its economic future.

"I have enormous experience of business, enormous experience of negotiation, enormous experience of economics, and I'm one of Britain's most successful businessmen," he said. "If they don't involve me, they're crazy."

[SongStar101]

Is the WikiLeaks Insurance File About Hillary Clinton?

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/wikileaks-insurance-file-hillary-clin...

WikiLeaks just released a mysterious filed labeled “WIKILEAKS INSURANCE” for people everywhere to download in advance of a huge upcoming announcement. This file serves as a type of “deadman’s switch” that is currently encrypted. WikiLeaks will release a second encryption key to unlock the file if they are prevented from making a planned announcement. Because of previous statements made by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, many people are wondering if this insurance file is meant to ensure that WikiLeaks can release potentially damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

Here’s what you need to know.

[Stanislav]

The Leaked List Of Hillary Clinton's Mega Donors

16 June, 2016. While the media's focus following the leaked DNC documents by lone (and hardly a group of Russian operatives hacker "Guccifer2" has been understandably on the Democrats' documents in which they reveal they strategy how target Trump and his republican peers, what we found more interesting was the list of the candidate's mega donors, those who have provided $100,000 and above, as per the leaked confidential documents.

For those interested in whose "generous" pocket Hillary Clinton will be found, if she is elected president, here is the answer. Source: zerohedge.com

[Stanislav]

SpaceX’s landing streak comes to an end as Falcon 9 breaks apart during touch down

15 June, 2016. A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket successfully launched two satellites into orbit this morning, but the company failed to land the vehicle on a floating drone ship at sea afterward. Prior to the launch, the company said this landing would be difficult, since the rocket was going to a very high orbit known as geostationary transfer orbit, or GTO. Sending satellites to GTO uses up a lot of fuel during the initial ascent, leaving less fuel to pull off the vehicle's return.

This Falcon 9 landing caused a bit of drama, since SpaceX wasn't sure at first if the vehicle actually made it down in one piece. Once the rocket landed, it shook the drone ship pretty violently, causing the ship's onboard camera to freeze. The last shots of the vehicle before the camera cut out showed the Falcon 9 standing upright on the ship, but there were also some flames around the bottom.

Afterward, a SpaceX employee announced on the company's webcast that the vehicle was indeed lost. "We can say that Falcon 9 was lost in this attempt," said Kate Tice, a process improvement engineer for SpaceX. Later CEO Elon Musk confirmed that the Falcon 9 suffered an RUD, or a rapid unscheduled disassembly. That's "Musk speak" for an explosion.

Later, Musk said that the problem had to do with low thrust in the one of the rocket's three main engines, and that all the engines need to be operating at full capacity to handle this type of landing. He noted that the company is already working on upgrades to the Falcon 9 so that it can handle this type of "thrust shortfall" in the future.

The video of the landing will be released later, according to Musk, once the company gets access to the drone ship's camera. Musk said it could be the hardest landing they've had yet, but the drone ship is still okay. However, the failure does put an end to SpaceX’s recent landing streak. The company has pulled off successful landings after its past three launches, all of which touched down on the drone ship. So far the company has landed four Falcon 9s in total — three at sea and one on solid ground.

SpaceX will have many more chances to land its rockets again soon. The company will launch a cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station for NASA on July 16th. After that launch, SpaceX will try to land the Falcon 9 on solid ground at Cape Canaveral, Florida — something it hasn’t attempted since its first rocket landing in December. And after that, SpaceX has another satellite launch slated for August.

Meanwhile, the company still has an impressive stockpile of landed rockets in its possession. SpaceX is keeping its four recovered rockets in a hangar at Launch Complex 39A, a launch site at Kennedy Space Center in Florida that the company leases from NASA. That hangar can only store five Falcon 9 rockets at a time, though. So whenever SpaceX does land its next rocket in Florida, the building will be at full capacity. Source: theverge.com

[Stanislav]

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

14 June, 2016. Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Department of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.

The Russian possession of the intercepts, however, was designed also to show that, apart from violating U.S. law in the fundamental handling of classified documents (which Sec. Clinton had alleged was no worse than the mishandling of a few documents by CIA Director David Petraeus or Clinton’s National Security Advisor Sandy Berger), the traffic included highly-classified materials which had their classification headers stripped. Russian (and other) sources had indicated frustration with the pace of the Justice Dept. probe, and its avoidance of the national security aspects of intelligence handling. This meant that the topic would be suppressed by the U.S. Barack Obama Administration so that it would not be a factor in the current U.S. Presidential election campaign, in which President Obama had endorsed Mrs Clinton.

Moscow’s discreet messaging about a possible leak of the traffic, in time to impact the U.S. elections, was designed to pressure faster U.S. legal action on the matter, but was largely due to Russian concerns about possible U.S. strategic policy in the event of a Hillary Clinton presidency.

Apart from the breach of U.S. Federal law in the handling of classified material, the Clinton private server was, according to GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs analysts, always likely to have been a primary target for foreign cyber warfare interception operations, particularly those of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Russia, and North Korea (DPRK), but probably also by others, including Iran Source: zerohedge.com