Kris H's Posts - Earth Changes and the Pole Shift2024-03-28T15:01:10ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisHhttps://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/66107747?profile=RESIZE_48X48&width=48&height=48&crop=1%3A1https://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blog/feed?user=3qm4lebygxjma&xn_auth=noSingaporeans not buying "Experts'" blaming persistent flooding on raintag:poleshift.ning.com,2012-06-19:3863141:BlogPost:8833532012-06-19T02:30:00.000ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisH
<p>Refuting PUB Expert Panel that increase in rainfall intensity contributes to flooding<br></br> <br></br> April 4th, 2012 | Author: Ng Kok Lim<br></br> <br></br> Dear expert panel, I refer to the 12 Jan 2012 Straits Times report “Annual rainfall is increasing here: Experts” [1]. It was reported that rainfall increased by 15mm a year on average between 1968 and 2008. The table below was constructed using government rainfall data [2]. It shows that by shifting the years by one or two, a completely different…</p>
<p>Refuting PUB Expert Panel that increase in rainfall intensity contributes to flooding<br/> <br/> April 4th, 2012 | Author: Ng Kok Lim<br/> <br/> Dear expert panel, I refer to the 12 Jan 2012 Straits Times report “Annual rainfall is increasing here: Experts” [1]. It was reported that rainfall increased by 15mm a year on average between 1968 and 2008. The table below was constructed using government rainfall data [2]. It shows that by shifting the years by one or two, a completely different picture emerges. For example between 1967and 2009, rainfall decreased by 23.5mm a year on average.<br/> <br/> Period Annual rainfall increase / decrease (mm / year) 1967-2009 -23.5 1967-2008 -14.3 1967-2007 -0.6 1968-2009 -3.8 1968-2008 6.2 1968-2007 20.7 1969-2009 -9.2 1969-2008 0.9 1969-2007 15.7<br/> <br/> Regressing annual rainfall on year between 1960 and 2011 gives a p-value of 0.4, an R square value of 0.014 and a coefficient of 3.4. Thus, rainfall might be increasing by 3.4mm per year but there is 40% chance that this is all fluke. Thus, annual rainfall data doesn’t provide a lot of confidence to your claim that annual rainfall is increasing. It was also reported that the number of days when there were at least 70 mm of rain per hour went up from 5 in 1980 to 13 in 2010. If that contributed to Orchard Road floods in 2010, why were there no Orchard Road floods in 2008 when the number went up to 14 (Figure 1)? If increase from 5 to 13 in 2010 is cause for concern, shouldn’t increase from 5 to 14 in 2008 be cause for more concern? Yet there were no Orchard Road floods in 2008.<br/> <br/> Figure 1: Number of days when at least 70mm rain fell per hour [3A] Referring to Figure 1 again, 1993 is the year with the highest number of days with at least 70 mm of rain per hour. If number of days with at least 70 mm of rain per hour is a parameter that is linked to Orchard Road flooding, shouldn’t 1993 have experienced even more serious Orchard Road flooding? The ‘evidence’ provided by the expert panel is weak and doesn’t support your view that weather patterns have changed and that higher rainfall intensity contributed to flooding. Next I refer to your Jan 2012 flood report [3]. Page 18, paragraph 3.2.2 of your report says there is strong year-to-year variability in maximum rainfall intensity and that the amplitude of that variability increased considerably over the last thirty years. But if high rainfall intensity or amplitude is a cause for concern, how come there is no flooding in 1995, 1999, 2007, 2008 and 2009 which have higher amplitudes compared to 2010?<br/> <br/> Figure 2: Rainfall intensity [3B] Considering Figure 1 and Figure 2 together, we find that 2008 experienced more frequent heavy rains and more intense rains than 2010. Yet, there were no Orchard Road flooding in 2008. In just two years, something has changed dramatically to cause Orchard Road to flood despite lower rainfall intensity and lower frequency of heavy rains. Therefore, the culprit for the 2010 Orchard Road flooding is unlikely to be higher rainfall since rainfall intensity was lower and frequency of heavy rains was also lower. We have to look elsewhere to explain Orchard Road floods. For a start, you might want to examine any major underground works or canal diversions in the vicinity of Orchard Road between 2008 and 2010. Page 21, paragraph 3.3.1 of your report says that 7 stations in southwest and northeast Singapore show statistically significant uptrend in hourly rainfall total. Question is, how much of the rain falling on those seven stations went into Stamford Canal? If not much, why should it matter? Page 22, Figure 3-7 shows stations registering statistically significant increase in rainfall intensity of at least 70 mm per hour. These stations are located in areas like Seletar, Lim Chu Kang, Boon Lay, Pandan Gardens and Sentosa. How is rainfall in these areas going to affect Orchard Road and Stamford Canal? Thank you.<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/04/04/annual-rainfall-is-increasing-here-experts/">http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/04/04/annual-rainfall-is-increasing-here-experts/</a><br/> <br/> <br/> Here's another article from Jakarta, explaining the situation in Singapore. They reference Orchard Street, which is a tourist/shopping center, so is a focal point. The end of the article also refers to the flood waters returning to the sea. Sure sounds like sinking to me.<br/> <br/> [Link removed by moderation]</p>Las Vegas soon to be ghost town?tag:poleshift.ning.com,2012-04-06:3863141:BlogPost:4673352012-04-06T21:00:00.000ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisH
<p>The Zetas discussed an impressive UFO display from late March on the Strip:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" height="360" width="640"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="never"></param><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI?version=3&hl=de_DE"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="false"></param><embed allowfullscreen="false" allowscriptaccess="never" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI?version=3&hl=de_DE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" wmode="opaque"></embed> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param></object>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Los Vegas is the glitter capitol of the US, where gambling and live entertainment make this a favorite tourist destination. Even if one loses the funds they came with, they can leave with a smile as they have been entertained, or so the management hopes. Certainly, even during this the second Great Depression, they have not been at a loss for traffic, and…</span></p>
<p>The Zetas discussed an impressive UFO display from late March on the Strip:</p>
<p><object width="640" height="360" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="never"></param><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI?version=3&hl=de_DE"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="false"></param><embed wmode="opaque" width="640" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI?version=3&hl=de_DE" allowscriptaccess="never" allowfullscreen="false"></embed> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param></object>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Los Vegas is the glitter capitol of the US, where gambling and live entertainment make this a favorite tourist destination. Even if one loses the funds they came with, they can leave with a smile as they have been entertained, or so the management hopes. Certainly, even during this the second Great Depression, they have not been at a loss for traffic, and the boom times continue at Los Vegas. We have stated that due to the hard rock from prior salt lakes in much of Nevada that the Pole Shift is not expected to</span> <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx047.htm">change the geography</a> <span style="color: #ff0000;">of the area. So what would put Los Vegas at risk that a UFO display that could be seen from the brightly lit streets of Los Vegas recently occurred?</span> <br/> <br/> <span style="color: #ff0000;">The great Hoover Dam is nearby, but when this breaks after the <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx391.htm"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">New Madrid adjustment</span></span></a> it is assumed that it will be land down river that will be in danger. Dams do not always break by shattering such that the waters they hold back pour around the shattered dam. The Hoover Dam in particular was built so sturdily that it is unlikely to shatter. This was because it was intended to hold back an <span style="font-style: italic;">immense</span> amount of water, and the site chosen because the rock on either side of the dam was considered impervious to erosion or crumbling. What then is likely to happen to the Hoover Dam as the pressure of the N American bow increases, as it surely will prior to the New Madrid adjustment?</span> <br/> <br/> <span style="color: #ff0000;">Spillways are openings in the dams, tubes that run through the dams ending in gates, all of which are vulnerable to being crunched and broken. A jammed gateway will hardly be <span style="font-style: italic;">unjammed</span> easily, as that would entail dismantling the dam or some such maneuver. Jammed shut, what would the water flowing into the lake above the Hoover Dam do? It would rise, and flow into Los Vegas along the ravines that connect the two. Flood may be the last thing that residents of Los Vegas worry about, but flood may be something that may arrive suddenly, and fail to drain.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/07ap2012.htm">http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/07ap2012.htm</a></p>
<p>UFO video link:</p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI">http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/d8VQOCIyJqI</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>I lived in Las Vegas from 2007-2010, and have followed ZT since around 2004-5. So of course, I've read the "Safe Locs" for the region. There is no mention of Las Vegas itself. I thought it was a little odd at first, since Las Vegas has a population around 2 million, and they did mention <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx088.htm">Reno</a>, which is considerably smaller. Here is the link to the comments for <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx047.htm">Nevada</a> . </p>
<p> </p>
<p>So what is the fate of Las Vegas? It seems as though it may become virtually unihabitable, even before the Pole Shift. Consider that Las Vegas gets <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/topics/water/">90%</a> of its water from Lake Mead, which is of course the Lake formed from the Hoover Dam blocking off the Colorado River. There is already alarm at how quickly the Lake is draining, as the Las Vegas valley suffers through drought. So what happens when "7 of 10" adjustments occur along the New Madrid fault line?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>ZT: "When the New Madrid adjusts, Mexico will be too far to the West for the current comfort of the West Coast, which will bow in the Southern California and Arizona region. The fault line that runs along Mexico's West coast runs <em>just under</em> the Arizona border, then on up along the West Coast of California. <strong>Before the West Coast of the US starts adjusting to the new position of Mexico, with slip-slide adjustments, there will be a bending of the Arizona desert area that will fracture the dry soil, create a breach in the great Colorado River dam, and allow magma to rise in the calderas in the US - Mammoth Lake in California and Yellowstone.</strong> If the Hoover dam breaks, whither the city of Phoenix, which lies on flat land and near farm land irrigated by the waters of the Colorado?"</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta355.htm">http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta355.htm</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to the prospect of no water, what else might Las Vegas experience? Keep in mind the fault line running North from San Diego to the Mammoth Lake caldera region:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>From ZT Newsletter:</p>
<p><strong>ZetaTalk</strong> <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta319.htm" target="_top">Comment</a> <strong>9/9/2006:</strong> <em>We have chimed in with Scallion on suspecting that a rip will occur from San Diego up toward Yellowstone, as there is a fault line there. Why would this rip, in a manner that would disrupt Mammoth? As we have stated in detailing the Earth Torque, wherein New England is pulled toward the East and Mexico toward the West, pulling the N American continent in a diagonal, fault lines will not be stressed in their traditional ways, but in new ways, during the coming months. New Madrid is an example. East of the Mississippi, going up, West of the Mississippi, going down. In a similar manner, the fault line from San Diego to Mammoth, and on up toward Yellowstone, will find the land South going West, with Mexido, and North staying with the land above this fault. Thus, should such rupture take place, in stages, evacuate Mammoth Lake!</em><br/> <br/> The original ZetaTalk prediction on this rupture places it in the timeline "some months" before the pole shift, a clue of sorts to a timeline when this rupture occurs. <br/> <br/> <strong>ZetaTalk</strong> <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p120.htm" target="_top">Prediction</a> <strong>2/15/2000:</strong> <em>Of course all volcanoes will explode, as this is going to be a very severe pole shift. What about the months and years preceding the pole shift? It is no secret that Mammoth Lake and the caldera of Yellowstone are warming up, and the populace has been prepared for these occurrences by the movie Volcano where there, in the middle of LA, lava is bubbling up. In fact, there is a fault line running from the approximate San Diego/LA area, up into the Sierras, and this is liable to rupture rather violently during one of the quakes that precedes the pole shift by some months. Volcanic eruptions from that area in the Sierras can be expected.</em><br/> <br/> Looking closely at a map of the area, it can be seen that there is a rift running from San Diego directly north to the Mammoth Lake area. This confirms what the Zetas have said about a hidden fault line. <br/> <br/> <strong><img src="http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta405a.jpg" align="bottom" width="398" height="276"/></strong> <br/> <br/> <strong>ZetaTalk</strong> <a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta405.htm" target="_top">Explanation</a> <strong>10/6/2007:</strong> <em>We have repeatedly warned that the US southwest was going to undergo a bowing stress, a situation that would last until the N American continent adjusted by a diagonal rip along the extended New Madrid Fault line, which includes fracturing from New England through the Midwest and down into Mexico. Until that adjustment occurs, Mexico is tugged to the west, causing a bow to form along the West Coast. The bow causes compression at its center, at the San Andreas Fault line near San Diego, and expansion inland. This bow is what caused the Utah mine collapse, as we explained at the time. Indirectly, this bow is what caused the Minneapolis bridge collapse, as it forces the St. Lawrence Seaway to open, causing adjustments all the way to the Black Hills of S. Dakota.<br/> <br/> San Diego is lowlands, as the nearby presence of the Salton Sea shows. This area will compress more than land to the north, as the rock is now less thick as it has proved to be pliable in the past, and distended. San Diego is thus due for a grinding action, a tumbling action, as the bow comes under increasing stress. When the New Madrid Fault line adjusts, the stress on this bow will relax but another nightmare will emerge - new adjustments along the San Andreas Fault line. Now the western half of the N American continent is free to jut to the west, at a diagonal, so slip-slide all along the San Andreas Fault line will occur for some time. We have mentioned that a rip will occur from San Diego up through Mammoth Lake of California and on up toward Yellowstone at some point. As one can see from a topographical map, there is a rift along this path, where ripping has occurred before. This too is awaiting the San Diego area, which will by that time be an almost unlivable area.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue167.htm">http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue167.htm</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>As you can see on the map, that fault line is directly West of Las Vegas (a bit north of where CA, AZ, and NV meet). What happens when those volcanoes erupt? The ash and smoke will blow into the Las Vegas valley, where they have issues with dissipating smog, due to being stuck between two mountain ranges. So add toxic air to a lack of water.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Secondary to these things, is the weakened economy there. They have been hit hard by the recent economic downturn, with one of the highest unemployment rates in the US (<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCAQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lvrj.com%2Fbusiness%2Flas-vegas-unemployment-falls-to-13-7-percent-117730123.html&ei=OEOyTaX3MpT6swOLhrT7Cw&usg=AFQjCNFu0DqBli9i1SBxHwfDXcfcHt9rVA">13.7%</a> ), and led the nation in foreclosure rates as well <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmoney.cnn.com%2F2011%2F01%2F27%2Freal_estate%2Fmetro_area_foreclosures%2Findex.htm&ei=jEOyTYGZO5GmsQOhzZ3yCw&usg=AFQjCNFHpqWCLa9R_9UeU_p4RtHOs3QOxA">in_2010</a>. The city runs on the success of the tourism industry, which has been slumping, and is still sluggish. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I also imagine the quake(s) that will be strong enough to break the land to one side of the Hoover Dam will also take some toll on the city structures. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I see all these things pointing to a mass exodus from the Las Vegas valley in the near future. People will simply leave it behind. Empty.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>Kiribati: Island Nation Explores Moving Entire Population to Fijitag:poleshift.ning.com,2012-03-09:3863141:BlogPost:8467812012-03-09T12:00:00.000ZKris Hhttps://poleshift.ning.com/profile/KrisH
<p><img alt="" height="600" id="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120309-Kiribati-map-630a.jpg" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120309-Kiribati-map-630a.photoblog600.jpg" width="503"></img></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fearing that climate change could wipe out their entire Pacific archipelago, the leaders of Kiribati are considering an unusual backup plan: moving the populace to Fiji.<br></br><br></br>Kiribati President Anote Tong told The Associated Press on Friday that his Cabinet this week endorsed a plan to buy nearly 6,000 acres on Fiji's main island, Viti Levu. He said the fertile land, being sold by a church group for about $9.6 million, could provide an insurance policy for…</p>
<p><img id="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120309-Kiribati-map-630a.jpg" alt="" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120309-Kiribati-map-630a.photoblog600.jpg" width="503" height="600"/></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fearing that climate change could wipe out their entire Pacific archipelago, the leaders of Kiribati are considering an unusual backup plan: moving the populace to Fiji.<br/><br/>Kiribati President Anote Tong told The Associated Press on Friday that his Cabinet this week endorsed a plan to buy nearly 6,000 acres on Fiji's main island, Viti Levu. He said the fertile land, being sold by a church group for about $9.6 million, could provide an insurance policy for Kiribati's entire population of 103,000, though he hopes it will never be necessary for everyone to leave.<br/><br/>"We would hope not to put everyone on one piece of land, but if it became absolutely necessary, yes, we could do it," Tong said. "It wouldn't be for me, personally, but would apply more to a younger generation. For them, moving won't be a matter of choice. It's basically going to be a matter of survival."<br/><br/>Kiribati, which straddles the equator near the international date line, has found itself at the leading edge of the debate on climate change because many of its atolls rise just a few feet above sea level.<br/><br/>Warming oceans could melt ice faster than expected<br/><br/>Tong said some villages have already moved and there have been increasing instances of sea water contaminating the island's underground fresh water, which remains vital for trees and crops. He said changing rainfall, tidal and storm patterns pose as least as much threat as ocean levels, which so far have risen only slightly.<br/><br/>Some scientists have estimated the current level of sea rise in the Pacific at about 2 millimeters (0.1 inches) per year. Many scientists expect that rate to accelerate due to climate change.<br/><br/>Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert / Greenpeace via AP, file In this 2005 photo released by Greenpeace, Pita Meanke stands beside a tree as he watches<br/><br/>Fiji, home to about 850,000 people, is about 1,400 miles south of Kiribati. But just what people there think about potentially providing a home for thousands of their neighbors remains unclear. Tong said he's awaiting full parliamentary approval for the land purchase, which he expects in April, before discussing the plan formally with Fijian officials.<br/><br/>'We're trying to secure the future' Sharon Smith-Johns, a spokeswoman for the Fijian government, said several agencies are studying Kiribati's plans and the government will release a formal statement next week.<br/><br/>Kiribati, which was known as the Gilbert Islands when it was a British colony, has been an independent nation since 1979.<br/><br/>Oceans' acidic shift may be fastest in 300 million years<br/><br/>Tong has been considering other unusual options to combat climate change, including shoring up some Kiribati islands with sea walls and even building a floating island. He said this week that the latter option would likely prove too expensive, but that he hopes reinforcing some islands will ensure that Kiribati continues to exist in some form even in a worst-case scenario.<br/><br/>"We're trying to secure the future of our people," he said. "The international community needs to be addressing this problem more."<br/><br/>Tong said he hopes that the Fiji land will represent just one of several options for relocating people. He pointed out that the land is three times larger than the atoll of Tarawa, currently home to more than half of Kiribati's population.<br/><br/>Although like much of the Pacific, Kiribati is poor — its annual GDP per person is just $1,600 — Tong said the country has plenty of foreign reserves to draw from for the land purchase. The money, he said, comes from phosphate mining on the archipelago in the 1970s.<br/><br/><br/><a href="http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/09/10618829-as-sea-levels-rise-kiribati-eyes-6000-acres-in-fiji-as-new-home-for-103000-islanders">http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/09/10618829-as-sea-levels-rise-kiribati-eyes-6000-acres-in-fiji-as-new-home-for-103000-islanders</a></p>