Earth Changes and the Pole Shift
ZetaTalk Chat for September 30, 2018
Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.
- Twitter: @NancyLieder1
- If your questions are just a demand for a hand-held tour, and it is apparent you have not even attempted to research or read the existing material, your post will be deleted.
- Commentary chitchat will automatically be deleted if it does not add to the questions already posed. The weekly Q&A chat is not a stage for opinions or rants.
Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.
Accepted questions will be noted as such.
- If Nancy indicates that your question is “accepted” then it will be answered.
- If not, assume it has been declined by the Zetas.
- The Q&A discussions just past and ongoing are pinned for easy reference.
- Answers will be posted monthly to the ZetaTalk websites. The discussion will be closed with a new discussion opened for the following month at that time.
- To find all prior chats on the ning, go to this list: http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/categories/zetatalk-1/listForCategory
Ning Rules that Apply
- No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to suspension.
- The existence of Planet X and the truthfulness of ZetaTalk are not debatable.
- This ning does not focus on religion or politics, so these types of questions will be declined as a distraction from the issue at hand.
- ZetaTalk only. Posting of or discussion regarding material alleged to be channeled or otherwise relayed by entities other than the STO Zetas to anyone other than Nancy Lieder of ZetaTalk.com is not allowed on this site
Zeta Rules that Apply
- No personal counseling is done.This rule has been in place since 1996. Questions should be of broad interest to the general public.
- Correlation or resolution of ZetaTalk with the work of other channels or authors is not done unless they predict and have a prediction accuracy track record, as otherwise they are not a peer of ZetaTalk which does so. This rule has been in place since 2002. Just because another website or author makes a statement does not make that statement true, nor will the Zetas explain to you why their statements are not true, as then they are taking time out to address the issue.
- The Zetas, as all visitors, are under rules on how they interact with humanity. They are not here to rescue you. They cannot divert Planet X just as today they do not prevent droughts or floods. The Earth is mankind’s schoolhouse whereby he learns to help his fellow man.
- The date of the pole shift cannot be given, but the sequence of events can be given. [ Link ] Check the ning pinned discussions and blogs for such information as the 7 of 10, the last weeks, etc.
Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.
This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 [73] years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.
Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.
Stanislav
Hi Nancy and Zetas,
Could the Zetas tell what triggered that unexpected tsunami? The authorities canceled the tsunami threat because of a lack of data in that area. Scientists also point out that the wave is too high for this type of earthquake (slip-strike). Yea, and in general the tsunami for this type of earthquake is rare. Example in 2012 when there was an earthquake (slip-strike) in Sumatra and there was no tsunami.
What is it about an earthquake that causes a tsunami?
Although earthquake magnitude is one factor that affects tsunami generation, there are other important factors to consider. The earthquake must be a shallow marine event that displaces the seafloor. Thrust earthquakes (as opposed to strike slip) are far more likely to generate tsunamis, but small tsunamis have occurred in a few cases from large (i.e., > M8) strike-slip earthquakes.
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-it-about-earthquake-causes-a-tsunami...
29 September, 2018. Indonesia tsunami sensors missed huge waves: Official
<...>
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2018/09/29/indonesia-tsunami-...
The geophysics agency (BMKG) faced criticism on Saturday on social media, with many questioning if the tsunami warning was lifted too soon. The agency said it followed standard operating procedure and made the call to "end" the warning based on data available from the closest tidal sensor, around 200km from Palu.
"We have no observation data at Palu. So we had to use the data we had and make a call based on that," said Rahmat Triyono, head of the earthquakes and tsunami centre at BMKG. He said the closest tide gauge, which measures changes in sea level, only recorded an "insignificant", 6cm wave and did not account for the giant waves near Palu.
<...>
Baptiste Gombert, a geophysics researcher at University of Oxford, said it was "surprising" the quake had generated a tsunami.
Friday's quake was recorded as a "strike-slip" event where neighbouring tectonic plates move horizontally against each other, rather than vertically, which is what usually generates a tsunami. "There is some speculation that there was a landslide under the sea which displaced a lot of water and caused the tsunami,"he said, adding the narrow bay may have concentrated the force of the waves as they moved toward the shore.
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesia-tsunami-sensors...
28 September, 2018. Indonesia's Surprise Tsunami, Explained
Scientists were surprised by the ensuing tsunami, which resulted in conflicting warning messages. But experts suggest that the area's unique geology could be to blame for the unusual progression of the disaster.
<...>
Tsunamis typically are the result of the abrupt motion of large submarine earthquakes at tectonic plate boundaries. And earthquakes are not uncommon in Indonesia; the island chain sits within what's known as the Ring of Fire, a curving horseshoe-shaped chain of tectonic plate boundaries that hugs the Pacific basin. It is home to around 90 percent of the world's earthquakes.
But the monster waves were unexpected for this particular quake.
The 7.5-magnitude earthquake appears to be the result of what's known as a strike-slip fault, which takes place as two blocks of crust grind against one another, largely in a horizontal direction. Tsunamis more commonly follow vertical movement in the crust, which disrupts the overlying water and can generate massive waves crashing onshore.
“It is definitely a surprise,” says Baptiste Gombert, a geophysicist at the University of Oxford. He notes that Indonesia's geology is highly complex. A spidery web of different types of faults cut through the region, so teasing out exactly what happened is a challenge. But preliminary results hint at a few possibilities.
The tsunami might be the result of some vertical movement along the fault, Gombert says. But he finds it unlikely this could entirely explain such high waves—some preliminary models estimate waves as tall as 16 feet. “Even if there was a little vertical displacement, this is a pretty big tsunami,” he says. It's likely landslides—either submarine or from the shores—also disturbed the bay waters, causing the wave.
The bounds of the bay itself may have also been an issue, notes Janine Krippner, a volcanologist at Concord University. “That can amplify wave height as it channels water into a smaller area,” she writes via Twitter message. But she emphasizes that there is still a lot of uncertainty surrounding today's events.
Indonesian agencies are directing locals to remain aware of continued dangers. “People are encouraged to remain vigilant,” said disaster agency spokesman Sutopo Purwo Nugroho, the AP reports. “It is better not to be in a house or building because the potential for aftershocks can be dangerous. People are encouraged to gather in safe areas. Avoid the slopes of hills.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/indonesia-ts...
Thank you very much
Sep 29, 2018
Nancy Lieder
Accepted. The quake and tsunami were right in the middle of the Sunda platelet, very odd.
Stanislav said:
The authorities canceled the tsunami threat because of a lack of data in that area. Scientists also point out that the wave is too high for this type of earthquake (slip-strike). Yea, and in general the tsunami for this type of earthquake is rare. Example in 2012 when there was an earthquake (slip-strike) in Sumatra and there was no tsunami.
[and from another]
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-it-about-earthquake-causes-a-tsunami...
The earthquake must be a shallow marine event that displaces the seafloor. Thrust earthquakes (as opposed to strike slip) are far more likely to generate tsunamis.
[and from another]
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/world/2018/09/29/indonesia-tsunami-...
29 September, 2018. Indonesia tsunami sensors missed huge waves. The closest tide gauge, which measures changes in sea level, only recorded an "insignificant", 6cm wave and did not account for the giant waves near Palu.
[and from another]
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesia-tsunami-sensors...
Friday's quake was recorded as a "strike-slip" event where neighbouring tectonic plates move horizontally against each other, rather than vertically, which is what usually generates a tsunami. "There is some speculation that there was a landslide under the sea which displaced a lot of water and caused the tsunami," he said, adding the narrow bay may have concentrated the force of the waves as they moved toward the shore.
[and from another]
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/indonesia-ts...
28 September, 2018. Indonesia's Surprise Tsunami, Explained.
The 7.5-magnitude earthquake appears to be the result of what's known as a strike-slip fault, which takes place as two blocks of crust grind against one another, largely in a horizontal direction. Tsunamis more commonly follow vertical movement in the crust, which disrupts the overlying water and can generate massive waves crashing onshore.
SOZT
The Sunda Platelet, that portion of the Eurasian Plate that holds Indonesia and snuggles down into the curve of the Indo-Australian Plate, is under great pressure. The great Pacific is pushing in from the East. The Indo-Australian Plate is tilting in the West, and in all of this the Sunda Platelet is the loser. Geologists are accustomed to looking at the Sunda dynamics as though this were a static situation, not part of the 7 of 10 plate movements we have described and predicted. Thus what looks like broad, stable, and flat ocean bottoms are assumed to continue. They do not.
Compression will take the path of least resistance. We have described thin places in a crust as being shown by river bottoms, as the thin crust sags and thus water pools and flows at the lowest elevation. These dynamics can be seen underwater also. Note that on the Sunda Platelet there are regions where the Banda Sea and Celebes Sea show deep water, with a compression ridge in the Arafura Sea where the ocean floor is being pushed down. Palu experienced tsunami because the water was DEEP there, due to thin crust in the bay. This caused tidal bore in the narrowing bay.
EOZT
Sep 30, 2018
Nancy Lieder
As is our usual practice, we are closing out this September chat and opening the Q&A for October. Please post your questions there.
http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-october-31...
Sep 30, 2018