Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 12:18pm Hi Nancy,
I have a reader that is ensconced in a survival location off-grid (solar & wind) for several years now. They rely on producing their own food and are very creative with several food producing systems: hydroponics, garden and animals. She was wondering about the time delay for replanting in gardens containing soils which have gone through the Pole Shift events and which are not under cover. She has your book which says: a " fairly seamless transition", but she is wondering if the Zeta's could comment on the particular area they are living in which is Eastern Australia, Queensland near tentersfield, 400 meters high at Latitude - 20° 30' 0 S and Longitude - 144° 24' 0 E.
Thanks,
Chris Thomas.
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 12:20pm Hi Nancy, may I ask whether the photo of the second sun being taken at the Port of Singapore is a genuine capture of Planet X?
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/sunset-over-the-port-of
Permalink Reply by Andrew Veresay on September 9, 2010 at 1:05pm Accepted. They meant, by the way, that New Madrid will have MANY quakes (5, 6, 7) before the one they speak of, in the range of a 7 of 10 occurrence.
Don Deppeller said:Hi Nancy;
In the Aug 4th ning chat, the Zetas stated that the New Madrid 'adjustment' is the "7 out of 10" event [their exact quote: "We have warned that quakes on the West Coast, or the Seaway, or in the New Madrid region will occur before the major quake in the New Madrid region we have referred to as the adjustment on a 7 of 10 level."] Yet the poleshift itself may occur many months later, even more than a year later; conversely, it could also occur in this same year (as the New Madrid 'adjustment'). Because the New Madrid 'adjustment' will probably result in numerous bridges being shattered or at least made impassable, it appears that many of us living in cities (where there are at least some jobs) may end up being trapped in them many months prior to the shift, and unable to get to our 'safe spots'. Obviously the Zetas have counseled us ad nauseum to move ASAP, as in yesterday, but they also recognize that for many people that's simply impossible, because most people can't afford to leave their jobs or to purchase land in the rural areas. My QFZT thus is; Can we expect the New Madrid 'adjustment' to destroy more bridges than just those over the Mississippi, the St. Lawrence Seaway, and those that connect the land masses around the Great Lakes? If so, do the Zetas foresee the authorities being able to rebuild them in the intervening time before successive cataclysms and 'adjustments' occur? Altogether, is it theoretically plausible that if we are not in our 'safe spot' (speaking of those living in the cities in the eastern half of the US and on the coasts and banks of the major rivers and lakes) ASAP after the Japanese quakes, it might be almost impossible to think of getting there with our 'bug-out bags' and even meager preparations?
It has me thinking that for many of us, we need to be out of the cities way before the last weeks provide naked-eye viewing of PX.
Thanks in advance.
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 3:51pm Nancy, you replied to me, "If this tsunami were outside of the normal tsunami that roll across the Pacific during Japan quakes, it would have been included in the 7 of 10 descriptions. Don't stand on the beach after the Japan quakes and you are likely not to be affected." This is an extraordinary statement. There are no normal tsunami during Japan quakes. According to a state DNR guy,' a tsunami that reaches Washington generated by at least a magnitude-7.3 Japan quake would occur, on average, about once in every 2,500 years. ' They also think that Washington had a tsunami from the Cascadia Fault about 300 years ago. Washington state has zero tsunami preparedness, no warning system, and has by its own admission, stated that " Evidence from Indonesia suggests wave heights of 80 feet -- far higher than thought. That means that assumptions in the maps in Washington, including 30-foot wave heights on the coast, may not reflect the worst-case scenario. The waves could be higher, the water faster and deeper and the damage more devastating." There is no experience with tsunami here and no good actionable information. If you look at a map, you will see there are tons of communities on the strait in both WA and on Vancouver Island, and there are heavily populated farming lowlands and communities on the inland Washington coast a scant 30-40 miles east of Victoria across the water. If as ZT suggests by their warning to Victoria and hence by default, warning to WA state, that a tsunami will roll across the Pacific, and that the strait of Juan de Fuca would funnel it straight to the interior, what is the scenario that we should expect? 100 ft waves that destroy the interior, 15 ft waves that lap the beaches? one wave? a series of waves? the interior coast destroyed? how far inland, how far up is high enough? How soon after a quake do we have? Just because it isn't part of the 7 out of 10 doesn't mean that it couldn't be devastating to the people here.
Permalink Reply by Waveguide on September 9, 2010 at 8:20pm 

Permalink Reply by Sathya on September 9, 2010 at 8:58pm
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 9:41pm Hi Nancy,
Is the July 1991 Barbury Castle Crop Circle depicting the three different magnetic trimesters that Earth experiances throughout the year? In the diagram, a slight shift is noted.
"But there is a slight period after the end of a phase when a particle crowding has not yet subsided, or an increase in particle flow has not yet registered. Thus, the end of those months is most accurate as a guide."
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/17jy2010.htm
Thank you.
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 9:44pm Nancy, thanks for the link, but when you look at it, this is what is also written below in response to another's question....
"With regards to the "sloshing Pacific in the straits off Victoria" the Zeta's explained would follow the 8+ magnitude earthquakes in Japan, how much "sloshing" can be expected? I have a friend who lives water front there who I warned about this and he expressed some concern about this. Would it be the likes of a major tsunami or excessive high, rolling tides? Also would the Vancouver area be greatly affected by this as a number of populated areas are at ocean level.
Quakes of a magnitude 9 (which would be downgraded to 8+ by the USGS) in Japan would occur as a result of a compressing Pacific, and thus would surely generate tsunami. Victoria was being warned because it lies on the coastline, directly on the water front, and directly in the path of the anticipated tsunami which will then funnel through the narrows and thus exacerbate the height of the tsunami. This will not be a roiling tide, it will be a tsunami which will rise up suddenly and roll inland with force and speed."
This is obviously more than just 'sloshing'. The Ache tsunami was 50-100 feet in height on all continents affected not 20-30 feet. It doesn't much matter the source of the tsunami, whether from earthquakes in Japan or earthquakes from subducting plates off the coast, both can result in deadly tsunami. Any tsunami affecting the strait of Juan de Fuca by default, because a tsunami rolls to all coastlines affected equally, would affect ANY inland WA and Canadian coastline on the Juan de Fuca, and not just Victoria. And how about the Pacific coast of WA...won't they get hit with a tsunami first? Anyone on the strait, anyone on the sound, anyone on the coast, would want to know, including Vancouver BC, Seattle and the coastal communities of inland WA....would you kindly please ask the zetas for clarification about their warning?
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 9, 2010 at 9:46pm Nancy,
I have been posting the earth wobbles from the worldwide seismic data. They are now beginning to show up every 18 hours. Is this the wobble that the Zetas were addressing? Assuming that this frequency will accelerate?
http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml
Sathya
Permalink Reply by Larry Taylor on September 10, 2010 at 5:30am
Permalink Reply by Derrick Johnson on September 10, 2010 at 5:47am Many STO will die during the 7 of 10. What is the likely circumstances of their 'greeting' upon their transition? Will there be Spirit Guides? Relatives? Aliens? Birthing blankets? All organized by the Angel of Death or ? Will the Spirit Guides know ahead of time who will likely die? Is there enough volunteers to help with all the transitions? Will these newly departed be able to communicate through dreams, etc. to their loved ones before the poleshift? Many of THEIR relatives will be dying in the 8 9 10 events.....will they be there to great, prepare the way for loved ones dying in the poleshift?
Permalink Reply by Nancy Lieder on September 10, 2010 at 10:53am Many STO will die during the 7 of 10. What is the likely circumstances of their 'greeting' upon their transition? Will there be Spirit Guides? Relatives? Aliens? Birthing blankets? All organized by the Angel of Death or ? Will the Spirit Guides know ahead of time who will likely die? Is there enough volunteers to help with all the transitions? Will these newly departed be able to communicate through dreams, etc. to their loved ones before the poleshift? Many of THEIR relatives will be dying in the 8 9 10 events.....will they be there to great, prepare the way for loved ones dying in the poleshift?
© 2013 Created by Gerard Zwaan.
Powered by
