Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.

  • Twitter: @NancyLieder1
  • If your questions are just a demand for a hand-held tour, and it is apparent you have not even attempted to research or read the existing material, your post will be deleted.
  • Commentary chitchat will automatically be deleted if it does not add to the questions already posed. The weekly Q&A chat is not a stage for opinions or rants.
  • Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.

Accepted questions will be noted as such.

  • If Nancy indicates that your question is “accepted” then it will be answered.
  • If not, assume it has been declined by the Zetas.
  • The Q&A discussions just past and ongoing are pinned for easy reference.
  • Answers will be posted by Saturday Noon EST. The discussion will be closed Friday morning with a new discussion opened for the following week at that time.
  • To find all prior chats on the ning, go to this list: http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/categories/zetatalk-1/listForCategory

Ning Rules that Apply

  1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to suspension.
  2. The existence of Planet X and the truthfulness of ZetaTalk are not debatable.
  3. This ning does not focus on religion or politics, so these types of questions will be declined as a distraction from the issue at hand.
  4. ZetaTalk only. Posting of or discussion regarding material alleged to be channeled or otherwise relayed by entities other than the STO Zetas to anyone other than Nancy Lieder of ZetaTalk.com is not allowed on this site


Zeta Rules that Apply

  1. No personal counseling is done.This rule has been in place since 1996. Questions should be of broad interest to the general public.
  2. Correlation or resolution of ZetaTalk with the work of other channels or authors is not done unless they predict and have a prediction accuracy track record, as otherwise they are not a peer of ZetaTalk which does so. This rule has been in place since 2002. Just because another website or author makes a statement does not make that statement true, nor will the Zetas explain to you why their statements are not true, as then they are taking time out to address the issue.
  3. The Zetas, as all visitors, are under rules on how they interact with humanity. They are not here to rescue you. They cannot divert Planet X just as today they do not prevent droughts or floods. The Earth is mankind’s schoolhouse whereby he learns to help his fellow man.
  4. The date of the pole shift cannot be given, but the sequence of events can be given. [ Link ] Check the ning pinned discussions and blogs for such information as the 7 of 10, the last weeks, etc.

Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.

This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 [73] years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.

Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.

Views: 12036

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Accepted via email:

Just saw this video.  Is this an example of sloshing?  If this indeed is a real video.
[and from another]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khUGiKMuzqY&feature=youtu.be
Big Tsunami hits Brazil's Coastline on August 23rd 2016 and media ignores it at a point no one has knowledge of the subject !! I asked many people on the streets of Sao Paulo and 80% did not know! The tsunami was massive and more could come after this one, the weather is completely crazy!
[and from another]
I live here in Santos and every time that a big storm with big waves hits our region it happens. This time it was stronger than before, but we know that the moon affected the tidal together with the storm and it makes the waves stronger than before. Another fact that has influence over the increasing waves was the dig of the seaport navigation channel. It was stronger than before, but if it was a tsunami the water should invade the city for many places cause in live in an island (look at Google maps and you'll see that) and it's not what happened. The major problems were in the coast, but in another areas of our "island" nothing happened. My home is 3 blocks from the beach and there are no damages.?
[and from another]
http://ban.jo/News/Latin-America/20160821/Severe-Flooding-Seen-In-S...  August 21, 2016 Riptides, rain and cold in Santos today.
[and from another]
I note earthquakes on the plate border between S America and Africa on that day and following, but too far north and no one else affected. No hurricanes, though a bit of rain was evident in the vids. Lots of matching videos for that date 8/21 posted on facebook, so not a fraud. A wobble N/S could bring the sea up into Santos on 8/21. I, Nancy, also got reports from two other ning members on that day, 8/21, that their sunrise was very much too far south. One member lived in Canada, the other in the UK.



SOZT
Though the South Atlantic has storms, hurricanes are extremely rare, and this was not caused by a hurricane. It was not a storm surge. Earthquakes on the entire eastern side of S American were not recorded, with the exception of multiple quakes on the plate border with Africa, including one on August 21, but these were all far to the northeast of Santos. This was not a tsunami. The date of August 21 is significant as several people reported to Nancy that their sunrise was in the extreme southeast . One such highly credible report came from Saskatchewan and the other from the UK, miles and hours apart from each other.

This was indeed thus a wobble slosh, in fact occurring when the wobble was returning the globe to its normal position. For sunrise to be too far South in Canada and the UK, the N Pole was pushed away from the Sun for some hours, and this would have caused the S Atlantic ocean to pull away from the shore at Santos and the water to pile up on the coastline of Antarctica. Then the globe bounced back, standing upright again, sliding Santos back under the ocean. Santos thus met the returning water, which had been piled high at Antarctica.
EOZT

Hello Nancy and Zetas.

Would the Zetas care to comment on video footage from Peru which appears to show an alien entity interacting with humans.

Is this footage genuine and if so, what is the intended message?

Thank you for considering these questions.

Watch: Alien Filmed at Peruvian Gas Station?

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/watch-alien-filmed-at-peruvia...

A UFO researcher in Peru is trumpeting incredible video which he says captures an alien appearing at a gas station and being chased away by witnesses.

The remarkable footage, from late last month, shows some kind of object or entity seemingly wander away from the side of a nearby building and begin creeping towards the gas station.

At random points, the 'thing' appears to either glow or reflect the many lights illuminating the area.

When one of the workers at the gas station sees the anomaly, it quickly departs from the area in a manner that suggests some kind of sentience as opposed to simply being flown away like a balloon.

Video: alien, ghost or robot in Pachacamac
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&...

When they realized, they first thought it was a luminous globe, but then three workers and a policeman came and saw legs which had walked and seemed to be a meter high.

The closest were was about two meters, when they went after him with the intention to go around, but stopped a strange feeling, to say it was not fear, but something different and emotional.

The scene was captured by four security cameras tap, from different angles, and from the cell phone of one of the workers.

EL CASO PACHACAMAC - Mejores Imágenes - Dr. Anthony Choy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03prEwRxq7w

El Caso Pachacamac - Investigación: Dr. Anthony Choy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afzTN09Lk4o

Accepted

Matt B said:

Would the Zetas care to comment on video footage from Peru which appears to show an alien entity interacting with humans.

Is this footage genuine and if so, what is the intended message?
[and from another]
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/watch-alien-filmed-at-peruvia...
A UFO researcher in Peru is trumpeting incredible video which he says captures an alien appearing at a gas station and being chased away by witnesses. The remarkable footage, from late last month, shows some kind of object or entity seemingly wander away from the side of a nearby building and begin creeping towards the gas station. At random points, the 'thing' appears to either glow or reflect the many lights illuminating the area. When one of the workers at the gas station sees the anomaly, it quickly departs from the area in a manner that suggests some kind of sentience as opposed to simply being flown away like a balloon. While the video lacks any verbiage from the witnesses at the station, their actions indicate that they were perturbed by the 'visitor' since they look to be chasing it away after it returns. At various intervals during the pursuit, the mysterious oddity even appears to float rather than run, although the video makes it hard to discern exactly how it is moving. Perhaps most perplexing is a second video from the incident that allegedly shows a much closer look at the entity but also manages to undercut the potential veracity of the case. In the extremely dark footage, the 'entity' looks extremely shiny and very balloon-like before it somehow manages to survive an encounter with a massive truck on the highway to which it tried to escape. According to another media source in Peru, three gas station employees and a policeman encountered witnessed the 'entity' and got as close as six feet from it before being overcome by a strange feeling not to come any further. Fortunately, the scene of the incident allowed for additional perspectives as the gas station was equipped with four security cameras and one worker filmed the affair with their cell phone. You can see out some of other the footage here.
In light of the testimony and reaction of the witnesses, it certainly appears that something strange happened at the gas station in Peru.
[and from another]
El Caso Pachacamac - Investigación: Dr. Anthony Choy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afzTN09Lk4o
[and from another]
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&...
When they realized, they first thought it was a luminous globe, but then three workers and a policeman came and saw legs which had walked and seemed to be a meter high. The closest were was about two meters, when they went after him with the intention to go around, but stopped a strange feeling, to say it was not fear, but something different and emotional. The scene was captured by four security cameras tap, from different angles, and from the cell phone of one of the workers.
[and from another]
EL CASO PACHACAMAC - Mejores Imágenes - Dr. Anthony Choy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03prEwRxq7w



SOZT
This is a genuine alien, with the ability to control gravity so as to float when desired or needed. It was also able to escape being hit by trucks on the highway by escaping temporarily into 4th density. It has two large legs and small stubby arms which are rarely seen in the video. Facial features would also be hard to discern, though it has two eyes and a very large brain. Why does it appear shiny? It generates its own light, as many Earth creatures do, being able to fluoresce. The intentional display of this 4th density creature on the 3rd density Earth was to expedite the Awakening.
http://zetatalk.com/awaken/a126.htm

This life form was selected for this presentation because it could fluoresce.  The location of the gas station was chosen because it was a popular gas station, with video surveillance, and cell phone cameras were known to be carried by many of the patrons. The timing at night was chosen because the fluorescing creature could not be missed, and would stand out on video. Validity of this sighting is bolstered by the many videos of the incident, and the many eye-witness accounts, thus making this a solid Awakening incident. We stated that sightings of alien bodies
http://zetatalk.com/awaken/a126.htm
would be on the increase, and this is one of them.
EOZT

Prior 2003 ZT: http://zetatalk.com/awaken/a126.htm
As we mentioned at the start of ZetaTalk, in 1995, sightings would be on the increase, mass sightings would then increase as the population affected became comfortable with such an event, and then sightings of alien lifeforms would occur. A conscious sighting might occur. This would be at a distance, as a glance, like the sightings of BigFoot, so no threat exists but lots of discussion occurs afterwards.

Prior 1995 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/awaken/a09.htm
Sightings will increase, and will include alien life forms. This will then move to telepathic discussions with these life forms, en-mass with groups of people.

Accepted via email:

I just want to make a comment about the reported 5.6 earthquake in Oklahoma.  I am vacationing in Minneapolis and this morning I was awakened by what I felt like an earthquake causing my hotel at Mall of America to sway.  I had to look outside the building to see if everything was alright.  I dismissed the incident because I have never felt an earthquake before but later this afternoon I heard about the news that the quake was felt all the way to North Dakota and Houston.  I'm sure this is much bigger than the reported 5.6 but I'm surprise that it traveled so far.  Is there any explanation for this?  
[and from another]
http://strangesounds.org/2016/09/m5-6-earthquake-in-oklahoma-felt-a...
M5.6 earthquake in Oklahoma felt across the entire midwest, from North Dakota through Houston. At 7:02:44 am local time, a major, M5.6 earthquake hit 14km northwest of Pawnee, Oklahoma. It rattled a swath of the Great Plains, from Kansas City, Missouri, to central Oklahoma. It was the strongest quake to hit Oklahoma in years.
[and from another]
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/34f0e22aa7f94ca187d02886167f1903/ear...
People in Kansas City and St. Louis, Missouri; Chicago; Gilbert, Arizona; Fayetteville and Little Rock, Arkansas; Des Moines, Iowa; Memphis, Tennessee; and Big Lake in the southwest part of Texas, all reported feeling the earthquake. Dallas TV station WFAA tweeted that the quake shook its studios.
[and from another]
http://www.news9.com/story/33008574/big-earthquake-rocks-central-no...
[and from another]
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/virtualtour/earthquake.php
The Northern California Earthquake, April 18, 1906. The earthquake was felt from southern Oregon to south of Los Angeles and inland as far as central Nevada, an area of approximately 200,000 square miles, nearly 8 times greater than that of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (magnitude 6.9). The intensity of shaking that an area experiences during an earthquake depends on the magnitude of the earthquake, its distance from the fault, and the type of ground materials. Soft, water saturated sands and sediments amplify the shaking even at great distances from an earthquake, while bedrock shakes to a much lesser extent.


SOZT
Clearly this Oklahoma quake was not a magnitude 5.6, when swaying was felt over a 1,255 mile swath. Compare this to the swath of motion recorded during the 1906 quake in San Francisco, which was only felt as far away as Nevada, a neighboring state. It is known that quakes that result from adjustments close to the surface result in the most damage to mankind’s structures. Deep quakes are absorbed by the surrounding rock, thus little shaking arrives at the surface. This Oklahoma quake was deep, and should have been recorded as a 9.5.

Clearly this deep quake was in preparation for adjustments along the New Madrid Fault Line, which will result in immense structural damage to mankind’s infrastructure. The Oklahoma quake adjustment was along rock strata that is MORE RIGID than the soft rock that ripped, taking the path of least resistance by pulling apart soft rock throughout the midsection of the N American continent. Essentially, the upper Midwest moved somewhat further East, while the Southwest moved with Mexico to the West. This is the diagonal pull that the N American continent endures, which ultimately results in the New Madrid adjustment.

We have long been on record stating that the big New Madrid quake will start
http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx329.htm
with relatively minor quakes of a magnitude 6-7. Of course, due to the downgrading that the USGS does, these quakes along the New Madrid Fault Line will be called a magnitude 4-5. But structural damage
http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx050.htm
will result in the cities along the Mississippi, and to bridges that cross the Mississippi.  Then the big New Madrid adjustment will hit. The deep rock adjustment during the Oklahoma quake should not be considered to be included in our prediction, though it is obviously heralding the start of the New Madrid process.
EOZT

Prior 2010 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx050.htm
When the plate tearing starts in earnest, these slip-slide jolts will be huge, and rise up to the magnitude 8-9 range, as we have stated. These quakes will ride up to the bend in the fault line just south of Lake Michigan. Earthquake damage is primarily done when the rock close to the surface is affected, as is known by man. The quality of the rock along the fault line thus affects the shaking and resulting damage to the surface. A glance at a map of the geology of the fault line shows that the rock along the Mississippi at Arkansas and Missouri is younger, laid down by sediment, and tends to fracture broadly, thus relaying earthquake jolts over a vast area. The rock strata that hold Illinois and Indiana is older, and more solid. Fracturing of the rock tends to be a single jolt, not the multiple ricocheting jolts that magnify any adjustment in the rock strata experienced by the rock strata in Arkansas and Missouri. The magnitude will still be considered high, perhaps an 8, but the shaking will not last as long, and the damage therefore not as great. Were the bend in the fault line just south of Lake Michigan not at a point where the southeastern part of the US is dropping away from the Seaway, the damage along the Seaway would be much greater. The fault line thence along the Seaway will unzip, along rock strata borders already established. Where stretch zones such as this normally have adjustments that are basically silent, they do much damage. The unzipping creates crevasses and landslides and sinkholes, and when this occurs under cities is devastating. The quakes will be considered much less than magnitude 8 but the damage will be greater, with consequent lost of life and infrastructure. A building that has collapsed because of a large jolt is no different than one that has collapsed because the ground beneath it sank.

Prior 2011 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx329.htm
Will the New Madrid just suddenly rip with our predicted magnitude 9 quake? Hardly. There will be a progression of quakes in the magnitude 4-5 range all along the New Madrid fault line, which runs up to the Great Lakes and thence along the seaway. The bow will become more stressed, cracking rock inland from San Diego all the way to the Mississippi, and forcing adjustments north and south of this point too, from the Aleutian Islands to the tip of Mexico. Sinkholes and crevasses will proliferate throughout the US in her stretch zones, in a swath that ranges from the New England states south to the tip of Florida and all points west. This is a large bow. Then quakes will increase to the point of being considered magnitude 6-7 along the long New Madrid fault line and its attendant splinters. The New Madrid adjustment will thus not sneak up on you, but will be well announced.

5.6 Oklahoma Earthquake Testimonials  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbOIUIT6HfQ

This is an interesting YouTube report since this guy woke up as the earthquake was being recorded. The actual earthquake in OK didn't show on his graphs but he was getting readings in Wyoming, California, and Nevada - two of which were removed from the earthquake reporting map as he was trying to determine where the large earthquake actually happened.early monitoring of reports on OK quake

Here is some additional analysis from codmaster2014 in which he reads that USGS is apparently not attributing this to fracking. The rest of what he is saying may or may not be helpful but he also shows where the aftershocks occurred additional analysis

https://www.rt.com/news/358730-north-korea-nuke-test-blast/
While I doubt NK has nuke capability, maybe another underwater strike?

As is our usual practice, we are closing this 9/10 Q&A so answers can be prepared for the web. Please post your new questions on the chat for 9/17. Thank you.

http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-september-...

RSS

SEARCH PS Ning and Zetatalk

Loading

Donate

You can support the ning by using the above button. 

 

© 2017   Created by Gerard Zwaan.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service