Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.

  • Twitter: @NancyLieder1
  • If your questions are just a demand for a hand-held tour, and it is apparent you have not even attempted to research or read the existing material, your post will be deleted.
  • Commentary chitchat will automatically be deleted if it does not add to the questions already posed. The weekly Q&A chat is not a stage for opinions or rants.
  • Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.

Accepted questions will be noted as such.

  • If Nancy indicates that your question is “accepted” then it will be answered.
  • If not, assume it has been declined by the Zetas.
  • The Q&A discussions just past and ongoing are pinned for easy reference.
  • Answers will be posted by Saturday Noon EST. The discussion will be closed Friday morning with a new discussion opened for the following week at that time.
  • To find all prior chats on the ning, go to this list: http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/categories/zetatalk-1/listForCategory

Ning Rules that Apply

  1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to suspension.
  2. The existence of Planet X and the truthfulness of ZetaTalk are not debatable.
  3. This ning does not focus on religion or politics, so these types of questions will be declined as a distraction from the issue at hand.
  4. ZetaTalk only. Posting of or discussion regarding material alleged to be channeled or otherwise relayed by entities other than the STO Zetas to anyone other than Nancy Lieder of ZetaTalk.com is not allowed on this site


Zeta Rules that Apply

  1. No personal counseling is done.This rule has been in place since 1996. Questions should be of broad interest to the general public.
  2. Correlation or resolution of ZetaTalk with the work of other channels or authors is not done unless they predict and have a prediction accuracy track record, as otherwise they are not a peer of ZetaTalk which does so. This rule has been in place since 2002. Just because another website or author makes a statement does not make that statement true, nor will the Zetas explain to you why their statements are not true, as then they are taking time out to address the issue.
  3. The Zetas, as all visitors, are under rules on how they interact with humanity. They are not here to rescue you. They cannot divert Planet X just as today they do not prevent droughts or floods. The Earth is mankind’s schoolhouse whereby he learns to help his fellow man.
  4. The date of the pole shift cannot be given, but the sequence of events can be given. [ Link ] Check the ning pinned discussions and blogs for such information as the 7 of 10, the last weeks, etc.

Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.

This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 [73] years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.

Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.

Views: 16283

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Accepted via email:

What was this plane doing, circling Denver?
[and from another]
Mystery Plane that was Spotted Circling over Denver leaves Military Officials Baffled
November 17, 2016
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3944484/Mystery-plane-circl...
The unannounced flight appeared in the late morning and made several loops above the city at around 32,000ft. Some speculated the plane was an E-6B Mercury, also known as a TACAMO (Take Charge and Move Out), a Boeing aircraft developed for the US Navy as an airborne communications platform. They are used to deliver instructions from the air to US Navy submarines fleets via a transmitter and antenna. The TACAMO E-6B airplanes are equipped with dual trailing wires that serve as transmitter and antenna, transmitting in the very low frequency spectrum.
[and from another]
‘Doomsday Plane’ Circles Denver during Covert Naval Mission
November 18, 2016
https://www.rt.com/usa/367431-doomsday-plane-circles-denver/
The US Navy has confirmed that a mysterious plane spotted circling over Denver for at least an hour was one of its fleet – but says details of its mission are classified.
[and from another]
Very Low Frequency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_low_frequency
Since VLF waves can penetrate at least 40 meters (120 ft) into saltwater, they are used for military communication with submarines.  Because of their large wavelengths, VLF radio waves can diffract around large obstacles and so are not blocked by mountain ranges, and can propagate as ground waves following the curvature of the Earth. VLF transmissions are very stable and reliable, and are used for long distance communication.
[and from another]
The Cabal will be Defeated no matter who Wins the US Presidential Farce
November 7, 2016
http://benjaminfulford.net/
A special-forces attack on a Khazarian base in Denver that successfully stopped cabal efforts to steal the US election on behalf of their zombie proxy Hillary, CIA sources say.



SOZT
Clearly this VLF plane was seeking something, triangulating a region by going around it repeatedly, honing in on its target as it did. It was using as a guide various metal subterranean posts that were part of the construction when the Denver International Airport was constructed. It indeed INTENDED to participate in VLF communications with nuclear submarines around the world. Now this is being reversed, so that the transmitter is being bombarded as a receiver, thus crippled.

It should be no surprised that those pushing to have Hillary in the White House intended to start World War III. Russia was being blamed for everything, by Hillary, and this group resented having ISIS eliminated as a threat as Soros and his pals wanted ISIS to create chaos to foment war. There were sleeper cells within the US Military, which had been carefully watched. They were to be sent like the dogs of war to do their worst, following Hillary’s humiliating loss. While a special ops group attacked them in the tunnels to the west of Denver, this plane was disabling their ability to launch nukes!
EOZT

Accepted via email:

It looks like something is intended from the positive side to stop Soros and team from doing their worse. Am I correct? That would be awesome!
[and from another]
http://benjaminfulford.net/2016/11/20/i-just-received-this-from-my-...
I just received this from my White Hat contact in DC who is with the Agency. “The word is out that Soros is dead. It is being discussed at the Pentagon as well. He was taken out. One by one the Bush/Clinton/crime syndicate is being removed. I will update you as I have more data”.
[and from another]
http://www.snopes.com/george-soros-dies-of-heart-attack/
A fake news web site reported that the billionaire philanthropist of liberal causes has died.
On 15 November 2016, a web site that publishes mainly in Croatian posted an English-language story claiming that George Soros, the Hungarian-American billionaire and philanthropist, had died of a heart attack that morning.  A representative from Soros' Open Society Foundations contacted us to confirm that Soros is alive and well, and that the report is false. Soros most recently made headlines on 14 November 2016, but not for dying: Instead, he took part in a closed-door, three-day meeting with Democratic lawmakers and operatives to plan their course in response to Trump.
[and from another]
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/democrats-soros-trump-231313
November 14, 2016.
Major liberal funders huddle behind closed doors with Pelosi, Warren, Ellison, and union bosses to lick wounds, retrench. George Soros and other rich liberals who spent tens of millions of dollars trying to elect Hillary Clinton are gathering in Washington for a three-day, closed door meeting to retool the big-money left to fight back against Donald Trump. The conference, which kicked off Sunday night [November 13] at Washington’s pricey Mandarin Oriental hotel, is sponsored by the influential Democracy Alliance donor club, and will include appearances by leaders of most leading unions and liberal groups, as well as darlings of the left such as House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairman Keith Ellison
[and from another]
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/11/14/report-soros-big-liberal-dono...
Billionaire George Soros and other big Democratic donors are meeting for three days in Washington, D.C. to discuss how to stop President-elect Donald Trump's agenda.
[and from another]
http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-5f62-d185-ad7d-5ffb02a40002
Schedule of Activities November 13-15.
[and from another]
http://mopaw.net/15/11/2016/caught-on-video-elizabeth-warren-seen-e...
Caught On Video: Elizabeth Warren Seen Entering Liberal Dark Money Meeting. November 15, 2016

[and from another]
Note this article published after November 15 is using an old photo of Soros and the interview was by phone! http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/george-soros-pledges-dollar10-mill...






SOZT
Is George Soros dead? If so, his death is being denied. Soros is on a hit list, sought by the same people who countered the election fraud attempting to get Hillary into the White House. There are many battles behind the scenes, and the truth is often one of the victims. Ben Fulford gives great insight into these behind the scenes trends and activities, but at times his sources are spectacularly wrong. His sources had Hillary dead on September 11, for instance, but later she returned to the trail with her wandering eye. On November 20 he stated his sources had Soros dead of a heart attack.

What is known is that a closed and very private conference was to start in Washington DC on November 13, lasting 3 days, and that Soros was scheduled to address the attendees on the last day, on November 15. Liz Warren had been invited and was caught on camera rushing into an elevator on November 15. Beyond that, no photos or reports have emerged as of the writing of this ZetaTalk on November 20. A Croatian newspaper reported on November 15 that Soros had died of a heart attack. Denials and cries of “hoax” were heard afterwards. Soros is 86, and certainly could have a heart attack given the recent setbacks to his agenda.

Why would a Croatian newspaper be the first to break the news? Soros was born in Hungary, next door to Croatia, and is likely the most famous personage from that region. Family, being informed, would contact family and friends in Europe, and the word gets out. Thus this Croatian article should not be dismissed out of hand. Why would a coverup be done? Those around Soros expected success in their personal endeavors based on the power of Soros, their great leader. They would delay the news forever if a double with sagging skin under the eyes could be found. Is Soros dead? Yes. He has had a mountain of setbacks lately, and more mountains before him. It did him in.  
EOZT

Hello Nancy and Zetas.

In the wake of Donald Trump's victory, there has been a push for social media and online news outlets to more actively filter stories published by untrusted sources. The theory being that certain fake news stories were so widely disseminated that they may have influenced the election result.

Is there anything more to this initiative beyond simple quality control? What do those in charge of social media and online news hope to achieve? Are there any implications for the impending Announcement?

Thank you for considering these questions.

'Fake news' on social media influenced US election voters, experts say
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-14/fake-news-would-have-influenc...

Experts have disputed Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's claim that less than 1 per cent of the social media network's content is fake, amid accusations hoaxes influenced the United States election outcome.

Mr Zuckerberg said it was "extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other" in a statement posted on Facebook.

"Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99 per cent of what people see is authentic," Mr Zuckerberg said. "Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes.

But Griffith University's professor of journalism and social media, Mark Pearson, said he was suspicious of the statistic. "There is an enormous amount of misinformation on Facebook and other social media," Professor Pearson told ABC News.

During the election campaign, fake news about now President-elect Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton circulated online. Stories about Mr Trump calling Republicans the "dumbest group of voters" and Mrs Clinton accidentally paying the Islamic State group $US400 million were among those determined to be false by myth-busting website Snopes. On election day, stories claiming Harambe the gorilla [who was shot at Cincinnati Zoo earlier this year], received thousands of votes were found to be fake.

"I am sure many of these posts would have influenced voters," Professor Pearson said.

Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/technology/google-will-ban-websit...

Over the last week, two of the world’s biggest internet companies have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.

On Monday, those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.

Google kicked off the action on Monday afternoon when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.

Taken together, the decisions were a clear signal that the tech behemoths could no longer ignore the growing outcry over their power in distributing information to the American electorate.

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg outlines steps to fight fake news after US election criticism
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-20/facebook-outlines-steps-to-fi...

Facebook, which is currently facing withering criticism for failing to stem a flood of phony news articles in the run-up to the US presidential election, is taking a series of steps to weed out hoaxes and other types of false information, chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has said.

He outlined a series of steps that were already underway, including greater use of automation to "detect what people will flag as false before they do it themselves".

He also said Facebook would make it easier to report false content, work with third-party verification organisations and journalists on fact-checking efforts, and explore posting warning labels on content that has been flagged as false.

Accepted.

Matt B said:

In the wake of Donald Trump's victory, there has been a push for social media and online news outlets to more actively filter stories published by untrusted sources.

The theory being that certain fake news stories were so widely disseminated that they may have influenced the election result. Is there anything more to this initiative beyond simple quality control? What do those in charge of social media and online news hope to achieve? Are there any implications for the impending Announcement?
[and from another]
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-14/fake-news-would-have-influenc...
During the election campaign, fake news about now President-elect Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton circulated online. Stories about Mr Trump calling Republicans the "dumbest group of voters" and Mrs Clinton accidentally paying the Islamic State group $US400 million were among those determined to be false by myth-busting website Snopes.
[and from another]
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/technology/google-will-ban-websit...
Google kicked off the action when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.
[and from another]
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-20/facebook-outlines-steps-to-fi...
Facebook, which is currently facing withering criticism for failing to stem a flood of phony news articles in the run-up to the US presidential election, is taking a series of steps to weed out hoaxes and other types of false information.
[and from another]
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-reveals-hit-list-of-alleged-fake-n...
Former congressman Ron Paul revealed a list of “fake news” journalists he claims are responsible for “bogus wars” and lies about Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the election. Journalists from CNN, the New York Times, and the Guardian are included.
[and from another]
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/367625-fake-news-post-truth-iraqi-wmds/
It seems the uneducated plebs are falling for ’fake news’ they read in ’new media’ and the lies of dreadful rabble-rousing populist politicians who are relying on people’s emotions, instead of ’objective facts,' to get votes. It’s all terribly worrying and poses a dire threat to Western civilization as we know it. Without a doubt the best, or rather the worst example of ‘fake news’ in the last 25 years or so, was the neocon lie that Iraq had WMDs in 2002/3. That wasn't peddled by ‘obscure bloggers’ and 'new media,' but by mainstream Western politicians, from ‘mainstream’ political parties, establishment-approved 'experts' on the BBC/ITV/CNN, etc., and Op-ed columnists in ‘serious’ and 'respectable' media outlets.
[and from another]
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/fake-news-media-face...
Some of the choicest slices of fake news, according to stories documenting them in the San Jose Mercury News, CNN.com, and the Washington Post, include reports that Twitter, Google and Facebook buried the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton; that tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots for Clinton had been discovered; that Elizabeth Warren had endorsed Bernie Sanders for president; that Donald Trump had died; and that John Podesta had been practicing witchcraft. Snopes slays the most pernicious fake news. The fact-checkers at the Washington Post, Politifact, FactCheck.org and many other news operations correct the egregious violations of the truth.



SOZT
Fake news is nothing new, and to view the media as being fair and objective is to be naïve. ALL media has a spin, depending upon the preferences of the editors and owners. Money buys cooperation and where this does not succeed, threats are used. In many countries, the media is not allowed to operate, or in such a limited manner it is frankly described as being the state channel. The current shouting about fake news is due to the confessions that some in the media are making about the degree to which the media was skewed in a direction favoring Hillary. The guilty are now trying to point fingers at the innocent.

CNN was so pro Hillary it was called the Clinton News Network. The Washington Post reportedly assigned 20 journalists to dig up dirt on Trump, yet the worst they found was a lawsuit by disgruntled Trump University students (who got their money back), comments about some women being fat, and typical locker room talk about how to make out with women. This received endless press while Hillary’s pay-to-play examples and careless treatment of highly classified email was buried. Hillary was giving away hundreds of millions of taxpayer funds and US weapons in exchange for riches for she and Bill. And no, the Clinton Foundation is not about doing good, as 95% of the funds went to the Clintons. It was a front, not a charity.

Hillary was having seizures on camera, yet this was not allowed as a subject of discussion in the pro-Hillary media. She was fed the debate questions by a CNN insider. She had an obvious ear phone during a debate. The polls were cooked, the methodology adding so many Democrats to the mix that they showed Hillary winning. All these polls were presented with a straight face by the pro-Hillary media, so that when the anticipated election fraud stole the election for her, the public would not be surprised. Google arranged for pro-Trump articles to drift to the bottom of any search, while pro-Hillary articles would be perched at the top.

Now we hear that the very villains in this blatant fake news narrative are going to help us understand that it was not they, but others, who were responsible! Snopes was and still is pro-Hillary. Google and Twitter only stopped their mischief when they were called on it by the public.  CNN and the Washington Post were constantly talking up Hillary and speaking of Trump as though he were the devil. Now these media outlets are going to lead the public to the light, and explain what is and what is not “fake news”. Don’t trust them.
EOZT

NTSB investigating the structural failure suffered by Facebook's Aquila drone on its test flight

The solar-powered drone it hopes will bring the internet to remote corners of the world. At the time, the company painted the initial test as a success, but it seems that The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) disagrees.

http://www.techspot.com/news/67134-ntsb-investigating-structural-fa...

That's good news but Q declined as we just addressed that recently on the FaceBook launch explosion.

http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue520.htm

Seems the drones will not do well either! The Council of Worlds does not approve!!

J A said:

NTSB investigating the structural failure suffered by Facebook's Aquila drone on its test flight

Accepted via email:

Both poles the sea ice loss is off the charts this month!  Seems something has changed?
[and from another]
Is it related to the warming of the oceans from the bottom and the wobble? Where will this lead?
[and from another]
https://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/crazy-cryosphere-reco...
Sea ice extent and area have both plummeted to record lows for this time of year in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Such dramatic losses rarely occur at the same time, which means that the global total of sea ice coverage is phenomenally low for this time of year. The weirdness extends to midlatitudes: North America as well as the Arctic have been bathed in unusual mildness over the last several weeks, while Eurasia deals with a vast zone of above-average snowfall and below-average temperatures.
[and from another]
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/22/extraordinarily...



SOZT
It is clear from the charts that the Earth wobble has increased. First, despite Siberia being on the same latitude with Eastern Canada and Europe, there are vast temperature differences. The globe around the Arctic seems to be divided in half in this way at the current time. Just months ago, in July,
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/23jy2016.htm
we stated that the hot and cold regions in the Northern Hemisphere were divided into four parts, due to the Polar Push and Bounce Back, and the lean to the Left and Right. Now the increased wobble has created a duality, not the quadrant arrangement of the Figure 8 that had been present since 2004.  

The Polar Push wherein the N Pole of Earth is shoved away from the approaching N Pole of Nibiru continues to create cold temperatures in Siberia, where the magnetic N Pole of Earth currently resides. This has also warmed Antarctica, which is getting more sunlight.  The Bounce Back is more fierce, so that Europe and eastern N America are also getting more sunlight, and thus the melting Arctic. What is missing is the temperature anomalies due to the tilt to the Left and Right. They have been lost in the more aggressive back and forth motion of the Polar Push and Bounce Back.  
EOZT

Prior ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/23jy2016.htm
The weather maps continue to document the daily Earth wobble, showing abnormal heat over the N American southwest and up into Alaska, and abnormal heat through Europe. Both these regions come under more equatorial sun due to the wobble, due to the lean to the left and then to the right. This is distinctly balanced by cold spots in between. Canada’s eastern provinces and the region above Hudson Bay receive less sunlight due this tilt to one side and then the other. Russia’s Far East and the Siberian region above China of course are pushed into the cold by the daily Polar Push, when the N Pole of Nibiru shoves the Earth magnetic N Pole away.

As is our usual practice, we are closing this 11/26 Q&A so answers can be prepared for the web. Please post your new questions on the chat for 12/3. Thank you.

http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-december-3...

RSS

SEARCH PS Ning and Zetatalk

Loading

Donate

You can support the ning by using the above button. 

 

© 2017   Created by Gerard Zwaan.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service