Questions can be posed on this discussion by a member, or posted to a ZetaTalk Question email address. Nancy will then post all accepted email questions from the general public to this discussion.

  • Twitter: @NancyLieder1
  • If your questions are just a demand for a hand-held tour, and it is apparent you have not even attempted to research or read the existing material, your post will be deleted.
  • Commentary chitchat will automatically be deleted if it does not add to the questions already posed. The weekly Q&A chat is not a stage for opinions or rants.
  • Research the ZetaTalk WebSite and use the Search Engine dedicated to the site. Check the prior ning chats archives or the prior GLP chat archives. This Search Tips Primer will make you an expert after only a quick read.

Accepted questions will be noted as such.

  • If Nancy indicates that your question is “accepted” then it will be answered.
  • If not, assume it has been declined by the Zetas.
  • The Q&A discussions just past and ongoing are pinned for easy reference.
  • Answers will be posted by Saturday Noon EST. The discussion will be closed Friday morning with a new discussion opened for the following week at that time.
  • To find all prior chats on the ning, go to this list:

Ning Rules that Apply

  1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to suspension.
  2. The existence of Planet X and the truthfulness of ZetaTalk are not debatable.
  3. This ning does not focus on religion or politics, so these types of questions will be declined as a distraction from the issue at hand.
  4. ZetaTalk only. Posting of or discussion regarding material alleged to be channeled or otherwise relayed by entities other than the STO Zetas to anyone other than Nancy Lieder of is not allowed on this site

Zeta Rules that Apply

  1. No personal counseling is done.This rule has been in place since 1996. Questions should be of broad interest to the general public.
  2. Correlation or resolution of ZetaTalk with the work of other channels or authors is not done unless they predict and have a prediction accuracy track record, as otherwise they are not a peer of ZetaTalk which does so. This rule has been in place since 2002. Just because another website or author makes a statement does not make that statement true, nor will the Zetas explain to you why their statements are not true, as then they are taking time out to address the issue.
  3. The Zetas, as all visitors, are under rules on how they interact with humanity. They are not here to rescue you. They cannot divert Planet X just as today they do not prevent droughts or floods. The Earth is mankind’s schoolhouse whereby he learns to help his fellow man.
  4. The date of the pole shift cannot be given, but the sequence of events can be given. [ Link ] Check the ning pinned discussions and blogs for such information as the 7 of 10, the last weeks, etc.

Note the Zeta's words on wasting the opportunity to pose question to themselves, and get a response via Nancy. They do not suffer fools gladly, and this will increasingly be the case.

This is an opportunity to discuss the public's expectations of Nancy, who is a single person, 70 [73] years old, with health concerns, who works every day for as many hours as her health allows on getting the message out to the world. She was asked, in the early days of ZetaTalk, to be as educated on astronomy as astronomers, and did so to a degree that allowed her to support the imaging of the inbound Planet X. She supported our debates on sci.astro on the absurdity of human math when faced with reality, on the matter of why the Moon is in the skies and not crashing to Earth, even though she does not speak math any more than she speaks Greek. To properly translate our concepts, Nancy, as she has so often mentioned, must be on the same page as ourselves, versed sufficiently in the subject to understand our response. Thus she has been asked to be educated to the level of a biologist or geneticist on the matter of the hybrids, to be a geologist on plate movements, to be a vulcanologist, to be a hydrologist on water movement, to be an archeologist re ancient civilizations, to be an electrician when discussing survival equipment, and to be a sociologist and political scientist on the matter of human behavior. Where images do not exist on the web, she draws them sufficiently to explain our words. We do not, on every answer, require Nancy to spend hours positioning herself such that she goes beyond what is needed to relay our message.

Bear in mind, during these chats, what you are asking of ourselves and Nancy. You have a resource here which you are regularly wasting and exhausting with idiotic questions! Nancy has warned that the time is quickly coming when you will get no response from her at all, just a statement as to which questions will be accepted. You have complained when she told you, in no uncertain terms, what was wrong with your demands or your questions. But those who do not learn are destined to be ignored, which is what is coming next.

Views: 5463

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Accepted via email.

The Zetas have been forthright in explaining that the moon attracts STS aliens.  Would they like to comment on a NASA photo from Google Moon that wasn't scrubbed in time? Is this more prep by NASA and the elite for disclosure?
[and from another]
YouTube user Wowforreeel first started investigating the figure using Google Moon, a collection of millions of NASA images made public. Some media sites are pointing to the figure's alleged resemblance to the ancient Greek statue, "The Colossus of Rhodes," which is thought to have sunk into a harbor after a massive earthquake in 226 B.C. Here's what the statue looked like.  
[and from another]
It can also been seen on Google Moon at 27°34’26.35?N 19°36’4.75?W

[and from another]
Regarding the statues.  Someone did a search on google moon and they are basically everywhere.  If you look at the locations, they are pretty much on one straight line.

Which of the prior groups
using the Moon as an outpost created the standing man statue? We have mentioned genetic engineering projects on the Moon, the Moon as a lab free from the large predators and swamps on Earth, but being 4th density aliens in the Service-to-Other, such a grandiose display seems inappropriate. We mentioned Service-to-Self aliens living on the Dark Side of the Moon at present, operating in the 3rd density, but they are trying to comply with the Council of Worlds requirement to maintain an Element of Doubt among mankind. This leaves the Annunaki, who were prone to grandiose displays and were indeed on the Moon in the past erecting large crystal communication devices. This is a marker, of theirs.

Prior 1995 ZT:
Currently it is a home for those in the Service-to-Self, who reside there in 3rd Density. However, their home is not what has humans talking, as they are placed on what is called the dark side of the Moon, never visible from Earth. During the era when the hominoid visitors from Planet X were running mining operations on the Earth, primarily for gold, they used the Moon as a communication outpost, as it was free of cloud cover and allowed for a more precise aim through space. However, earlier still the Moon was used as an outpost by groups conducting genetic engineering operations on Earth, as many of these groups found the Earth to be a virtual swamp of life - murky, unpredictable, crawling with bugs and germs, and subject to erratic weather extremes. Their scientists had their specimens brought to the lab for detail work, and returned the fertilized ova for implantation. Thus, the structures seen on the Moon are ancient, and are a combination of the shards of Moon cities from genetic engineering operations and the shards of communication crystals - abandoned and idle but causing quite a stir among humans these days.

Declined as addressed before but hard to locate with the search engine as the date and name not in the chat.

If you have the time could you ask the Zeta if the Russian UFO video footage is real or not? The Russians indicate the space ship or whatever it is is too narrow to house normal sized occupants? Is this really a crash site? If so, when was it? Will we ever get the truth to stuff like this?

We have stated before, that alien ships do not crash unless on purpose, as in the case of Roswell and in Brazil, the Brazilian Roswell. Here no such intent existed, so this site is not a crashed UFO. In dealing with the alien presence, one should understand that the governments involved, the military involved, is loathe to admit that some force other than themselves have such power and technology. They therefore lie about events. They try their hand at emulating the technology and when they fail, claim an alien has crashed. They mock up video footage so they can point to an alien involvement. Thus, we are telling you this is all false.

Rustam said:

any comments please about Dalnegorsk UFO Crash 1986  in 1986, on January 29  (Roswell Incident of the Soviet Union)

As is our usual practice we are closing this 8/17 Q&A so answers can be prepared for the web. Please post your new questions on the chat for 8/24. Thank you.


SEARCH PS Ning and Zetatalk



You can support the ning by using the above button. 


© 2017   Created by Gerard Zwaan.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service